All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [refpolicy] user access to DOS files
@ 2011-11-07  3:08 Russell Coker
  2011-11-08 13:22 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Russell Coker @ 2011-11-07  3:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: refpolicy

The attached patch adds a new boolean for granting users access to dosfs_t.

Also in the same patch is a Debian specific patch to allow users to read 
/var/lib/apt/lists.  While it's generally best to split patches I think that 
having an uncontroversial patch wrapped with distro_debian appended isn't a 
big deal.  If the dosfs_t patch is rejected I'll submit the Debian one 
separately.

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dos-files.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20111107/c4cd8cba/attachment.bin 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [refpolicy] user access to DOS files
  2011-11-07  3:08 [refpolicy] user access to DOS files Russell Coker
@ 2011-11-08 13:22 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christopher J. PeBenito @ 2011-11-08 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: refpolicy

On 11/06/11 22:08, Russell Coker wrote:
> The attached patch adds a new boolean for granting users access to dosfs_t.
> 
> Also in the same patch is a Debian specific patch to allow users to read 
> /var/lib/apt/lists.  While it's generally best to split patches I think that 
> having an uncontroversial patch wrapped with distro_debian appended isn't a 
> big deal.  If the dosfs_t patch is rejected I'll submit the Debian one 
> separately.

These are in userdom_base_user_template(); that is too low level of a template for these rules.  That template is supposed to be as close to the absolute minimum usable user as possible.  userdom_unpriv_user_template() or userdom_common_user_template() would be better choices.

> diff -ru ./policy/global_tunables /tmp/refpolicy/policy/global_tunables
> --- ./policy/global_tunables	2011-02-19 11:44:29.585412285 +1100
> +++ /tmp/refpolicy/policy/global_tunables	2011-11-07 13:22:19.258199269 +1100
> @@ -111,3 +111,10 @@
>  ## </p>
>  ## </desc>
>  gen_tunable(user_tcp_server,false)
> +
> +## <desc>
> +## <p>
> +## Allow users to manage files on dosfs_t devices, usually removable media
> +## </p>
> +## </desc>
> +gen_tunable(user_manage_dos_files,true)
> diff -ru ./policy/modules/system/userdomain.if /tmp/refpolicy/policy/modules/system/userdomain.if
> --- ./policy/modules/system/userdomain.if	2011-10-29 21:44:32.502459650 +1100
> +++ /tmp/refpolicy/policy/modules/system/userdomain.if	2011-11-07 13:22:19.310197159 +1100
> @@ -117,6 +118,19 @@
>  		# Allow making the stack executable via mprotect.
>  		allow $1_t self:process execstack;
>  	')
> +
> +	tunable_policy(`user_manage_dos_files',`
> +		fs_manage_dos_dirs($1_t)
> +		fs_manage_dos_files($1_t)
> +	')
> +
> +	ifdef(`distro_debian', `
> +		# allow reading /var/lib/apt/lists
> +		apt_read_db($1_t)
> +		# allow reading /var/cache/apt - should not be needed but
> +		# does not really matter
> +		apt_read_cache($1_t)
> +	')
>  ')
>  
>  #######################################



-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-08 13:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-07  3:08 [refpolicy] user access to DOS files Russell Coker
2011-11-08 13:22 ` Christopher J. PeBenito

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.