From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv4 02/13] ARM: vic: device tree binding
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:20:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EBBEBD3.8090001@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111110144648.GC16018@totoro>
On 10/11/11 14:46, Jamie Iles wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:09:59AM +0000, Jamie Iles wrote:
>> This adds a device tree binding for the VIC based on the of_irq_init()
>> support. This adds an irqdomain to the vic and always registers all
>> vics in the static vic array rather than for pm only to keep track of
>> the irq domain. struct irq_data::hwirq is used where appropriate rather
>> than runtime masking.
>>
>> v2: - use irq_domain_simple_ops
>> - remove stub implementation of vic_of_init for !CONFIG_OF
>> - Make VIC select IRQ_DOMAIN
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vic.txt | 29 +++++++
>> arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/arm/common/vic.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/vic.h | 7 ++-
>> 4 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vic.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/vic.c b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
>> index 01f18a4..e689975 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/common/vic.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@
> [...]
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> +int __init vic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *regs;
>> + int irq_base;
>> +
>> + if (WARN(parent, "non-root VICs are not supported"))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + regs = of_iomap(node, 0);
>> + if (WARN_ON(!regs))
>> + return -EIO;
>> +
>> + irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, 32, numa_node_id());
>> + if (WARN_ON(irq_base < 0))
>> + goto out_unmap;
>
> Hmm, this appears to need linux/export.h for THIS_MODULE now.
> linux/irq.h has a comment saying it uses a macro to avoid needing an
> include of export.h there so I guess it needs to go in here instead.
Yes, I had to hack it when I tested this series on PB1176 (and of course
forgot to send the patch around...).
It seems a bit backward to impose including linux/export.h while this
file doesn't use any of it directly.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
Cc: "kgene.kim@samsung.com" <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linus.walleij@stericsson.com" <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"rmallon@gmail.com" <rmallon@gmail.com>,
"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
"grant.likely@secretlab.ca" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
"hsweeten@visionengravers.com" <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>,
"rajeev-dlh.kumar@st.com" <rajeev-dlh.kumar@st.com>,
"ben-linux@fluff.org" <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"rubini@unipv.it" <rubini@unipv.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 02/13] ARM: vic: device tree binding
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:20:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EBBEBD3.8090001@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111110144648.GC16018@totoro>
On 10/11/11 14:46, Jamie Iles wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:09:59AM +0000, Jamie Iles wrote:
>> This adds a device tree binding for the VIC based on the of_irq_init()
>> support. This adds an irqdomain to the vic and always registers all
>> vics in the static vic array rather than for pm only to keep track of
>> the irq domain. struct irq_data::hwirq is used where appropriate rather
>> than runtime masking.
>>
>> v2: - use irq_domain_simple_ops
>> - remove stub implementation of vic_of_init for !CONFIG_OF
>> - Make VIC select IRQ_DOMAIN
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vic.txt | 29 +++++++
>> arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/arm/common/vic.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/vic.h | 7 ++-
>> 4 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vic.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/vic.c b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
>> index 01f18a4..e689975 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/common/vic.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@
> [...]
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> +int __init vic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *regs;
>> + int irq_base;
>> +
>> + if (WARN(parent, "non-root VICs are not supported"))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + regs = of_iomap(node, 0);
>> + if (WARN_ON(!regs))
>> + return -EIO;
>> +
>> + irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, 32, numa_node_id());
>> + if (WARN_ON(irq_base < 0))
>> + goto out_unmap;
>
> Hmm, this appears to need linux/export.h for THIS_MODULE now.
> linux/irq.h has a comment saying it uses a macro to avoid needing an
> include of export.h there so I guess it needs to go in here instead.
Yes, I had to hack it when I tested this series on PB1176 (and of course
forgot to send the patch around...).
It seems a bit backward to impose including linux/export.h while this
file doesn't use any of it directly.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-10 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-04 1:09 [PATCHv4 00/13] VIC DT binding and MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:09 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:09 ` [PATCHv4 01/13] ARM: Make global handler and CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER mutually exclusive Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:09 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:09 ` [PATCHv4 02/13] ARM: vic: device tree binding Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:09 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-10 14:46 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-10 14:46 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-10 15:20 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2011-11-10 15:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-11-10 16:28 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-10 16:28 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 03/13] ARM: vic: MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER handler Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 04/13] ARM: ep93xx: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 05/13] ARM: netx: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 06/13] ARM: nomadik: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 07/13] ARM: s3c64xx: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-09 11:25 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-11-09 11:25 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-11-09 11:34 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-11-09 11:34 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-11-09 11:54 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-09 11:54 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-09 12:30 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-11-09 12:30 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-11-10 14:53 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-10 14:53 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-10 16:19 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-11-10 16:19 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-11-09 14:50 ` Rob Herring
2011-11-09 14:50 ` Rob Herring
2011-11-09 14:55 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-09 14:55 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 08/13] ARM: spear: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-09 10:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2011-11-09 10:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 09/13] ARM: u300: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 10/13] ARM: versatile: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-09 10:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-11-09 10:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 11/13] ARM: samsung: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 12/13] ARM: picoxcell: " Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` [PATCHv4 13/13] ARM: VIC: remove non MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER support Jamie Iles
2011-11-04 1:10 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-09 10:01 ` [PATCHv4 00/13] VIC DT binding and MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER Jamie Iles
2011-11-09 10:01 ` Jamie Iles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EBBEBD3.8090001@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.