From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mach-ux500: add devicetree compat nodes
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:13:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EBD49A6.2020306@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkda-9OVP8E1qO3Nc5znw_v7cKFiv8T5HHwTCnY2C9Fg7iA@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/11/2011 09:59 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> MACHINE_START(U8500, "ST-Ericsson MOP500 platform")
>>> /* Maintainer: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com> */
>>> .boot_params = 0x100,
>>> @@ -651,6 +666,7 @@ MACHINE_START(U8500, "ST-Ericsson MOP500 platform")
>>> /* we re-use nomadik timer here */
>>> .timer = &ux500_timer,
>>> .init_machine = mop500_init_machine,
>>> + .dt_compat = mop500_dt_board_compat,
>>> MACHINE_END
>>>
>>> MACHINE_START(HREFV60, "ST-Ericsson U8500 Platform HREFv60+")
>>> @@ -659,6 +675,7 @@ MACHINE_START(HREFV60, "ST-Ericsson U8500 Platform HREFv60+")
>>> .init_irq = ux500_init_irq,
>>> .timer = &ux500_timer,
>>> .init_machine = mop500_init_machine,
>>> + .dt_compat = hrefv60_dt_board_compat,
>>> MACHINE_END
>>>
>>> MACHINE_START(SNOWBALL, "Calao Systems Snowball platform")
>>> @@ -668,4 +685,5 @@ MACHINE_START(SNOWBALL, "Calao Systems Snowball platform")
>>> /* we re-use nomadik timer here */
>>> .timer = &ux500_timer,
>>> .init_machine = mop500_init_machine,
>>> + .dt_compat = snowball_dt_board_compat,
>>> MACHINE_END
>>
>> These all look very similar and should be combined. Why do you not have
>> 1 machine for all DT platforms as other SOCs are doing?
>
> This needs to be rebased for the latest kernel.
> Which looks like this:
>
> MACHINE_START(U8500, "ST-Ericsson MOP500 platform")
> /* Maintainer: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com> */
> .atag_offset = 0x100,
> .map_io = u8500_map_io,
> .init_irq = ux500_init_irq,
> /* we re-use nomadik timer here */
> .timer = &ux500_timer,
> .init_machine = mop500_init_machine,
> MACHINE_END
>
> MACHINE_START(HREFV60, "ST-Ericsson U8500 Platform HREFv60+")
> .atag_offset = 0x100,
> .map_io = u8500_map_io,
> .init_irq = ux500_init_irq,
> .timer = &ux500_timer,
> .init_machine = hrefv60_init_machine,
> MACHINE_END
>
> MACHINE_START(SNOWBALL, "Calao Systems Snowball platform")
> .atag_offset = 0x100,
> .map_io = u8500_map_io,
> .init_irq = ux500_init_irq,
> /* we re-use nomadik timer here */
> .timer = &ux500_timer,
> .init_machine = snowball_init_machine,
> MACHINE_END
>
> So - different .init_machine() calls, needed to simplify the board
> files as of now. (Patch from Lee Jones.)
>
But ultimately I would expect that the init_machine calls to be the same
with a DT based machine. This goes back to do we add DT to existing
boards or create a new clean DT machine and add to it as boards are
converted?
Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Nicolas.Pitre.nicolas.pitre-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Grant.Likely.grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mach-ux500: add devicetree compat nodes
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:13:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EBD49A6.2020306@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkda-9OVP8E1qO3Nc5znw_v7cKFiv8T5HHwTCnY2C9Fg7iA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On 11/11/2011 09:59 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>>> MACHINE_START(U8500, "ST-Ericsson MOP500 platform")
>>> /* Maintainer: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar-0IS4wlFg1OjSUeElwK9/Pw@public.gmane.org> */
>>> .boot_params = 0x100,
>>> @@ -651,6 +666,7 @@ MACHINE_START(U8500, "ST-Ericsson MOP500 platform")
>>> /* we re-use nomadik timer here */
>>> .timer = &ux500_timer,
>>> .init_machine = mop500_init_machine,
>>> + .dt_compat = mop500_dt_board_compat,
>>> MACHINE_END
>>>
>>> MACHINE_START(HREFV60, "ST-Ericsson U8500 Platform HREFv60+")
>>> @@ -659,6 +675,7 @@ MACHINE_START(HREFV60, "ST-Ericsson U8500 Platform HREFv60+")
>>> .init_irq = ux500_init_irq,
>>> .timer = &ux500_timer,
>>> .init_machine = mop500_init_machine,
>>> + .dt_compat = hrefv60_dt_board_compat,
>>> MACHINE_END
>>>
>>> MACHINE_START(SNOWBALL, "Calao Systems Snowball platform")
>>> @@ -668,4 +685,5 @@ MACHINE_START(SNOWBALL, "Calao Systems Snowball platform")
>>> /* we re-use nomadik timer here */
>>> .timer = &ux500_timer,
>>> .init_machine = mop500_init_machine,
>>> + .dt_compat = snowball_dt_board_compat,
>>> MACHINE_END
>>
>> These all look very similar and should be combined. Why do you not have
>> 1 machine for all DT platforms as other SOCs are doing?
>
> This needs to be rebased for the latest kernel.
> Which looks like this:
>
> MACHINE_START(U8500, "ST-Ericsson MOP500 platform")
> /* Maintainer: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar-0IS4wlFg1OjSUeElwK9/Pw@public.gmane.org> */
> .atag_offset = 0x100,
> .map_io = u8500_map_io,
> .init_irq = ux500_init_irq,
> /* we re-use nomadik timer here */
> .timer = &ux500_timer,
> .init_machine = mop500_init_machine,
> MACHINE_END
>
> MACHINE_START(HREFV60, "ST-Ericsson U8500 Platform HREFv60+")
> .atag_offset = 0x100,
> .map_io = u8500_map_io,
> .init_irq = ux500_init_irq,
> .timer = &ux500_timer,
> .init_machine = hrefv60_init_machine,
> MACHINE_END
>
> MACHINE_START(SNOWBALL, "Calao Systems Snowball platform")
> .atag_offset = 0x100,
> .map_io = u8500_map_io,
> .init_irq = ux500_init_irq,
> /* we re-use nomadik timer here */
> .timer = &ux500_timer,
> .init_machine = snowball_init_machine,
> MACHINE_END
>
> So - different .init_machine() calls, needed to simplify the board
> files as of now. (Patch from Lee Jones.)
>
But ultimately I would expect that the init_machine calls to be the same
with a DT based machine. This goes back to do we add DT to existing
boards or create a new clean DT machine and add to it as boards are
converted?
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-11 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-11 15:05 [PATCH] mach-ux500: add devicetree compat nodes Niklas Hernaeus
2011-11-11 15:05 ` Niklas Hernaeus
2011-11-11 15:17 ` Rob Herring
2011-11-11 15:17 ` Rob Herring
2011-11-11 15:59 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-11 15:59 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-11 16:13 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2011-11-11 16:13 ` Rob Herring
2011-11-11 16:26 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-11 16:26 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-11 16:38 ` Rob Herring
2011-11-11 16:38 ` Rob Herring
2011-11-11 17:00 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-11 17:00 ` Linus Walleij
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-11 15:17 Niklas Hernaeus
2011-11-11 15:17 ` Niklas Hernaeus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EBD49A6.2020306@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.