From: Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Subject: kernel 3.1.1 / 3.1.0 reiserfs locking problems
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:59:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC27039.6010904@t-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzuWD1xRhQNLfe0ey_-1vACwY=ofD5PXSzL_5UeDRbk8g@mail.gmail.com>
Am 31.10.2011 16:08, schrieb Linus Torvalds:
With kernel 3.1.1 there is another reiserfs related lock probleme:
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.896976]
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.896979] =================================
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.896990] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.896997] 3.1.1-main #8
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897001] ---------------------------------
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897007] inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage.
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897016] kswapd0/16 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897023] (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.?.}, at: [<c01f8bd4>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897044] {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} state was registered at:
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897050] [<c014a5b9>] mark_held_locks+0xae/0xd0
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897060] [<c014aab3>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0x7d/0x91
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897068] [<c0190ee0>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1a/0x93
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897078] [<c01e7728>] reiserfs_alloc_inode+0x13/0x3d
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897088] [<c01a5b06>] alloc_inode+0x14/0x5f
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897097] [<c01a5cb9>] iget5_locked+0x62/0x13a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897106] [<c01e99e0>] reiserfs_fill_super+0x410/0x8b9
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897114] [<c01953da>] mount_bdev+0x10b/0x159
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897123] [<c01e764d>] get_super_block+0x10/0x12
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897131] [<c0195b38>] mount_fs+0x59/0x12d
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897138] [<c01a80d1>] vfs_kern_mount+0x45/0x7a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897147] [<c01a83e3>] do_kern_mount+0x2f/0xb0
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897155] [<c01a987a>] do_mount+0x5c2/0x612
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897163] [<c01a9a72>] sys_mount+0x61/0x8f
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897170] [<c044060c>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897181] irq event stamp: 7509691
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897186] hardirqs last enabled at (7509691): [<c0190f34>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x6e/0x93
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897197] hardirqs last disabled at (7509690): [<c0190eea>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x24/0x93
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897209] softirqs last enabled at (7508896): [<c01294bd>] __do_softirq+0xee/0xfd
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897222] softirqs last disabled at (7508859): [<c01030ed>] do_softirq+0x50/0x9d
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897234]
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897235] other info that might help us debug this:
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897242] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897244]
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897250] CPU0
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897254] ----
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897257] lock(&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock);
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897265] <Interrupt>
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897269] lock(&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock);
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897276]
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897277] *** DEADLOCK ***
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897278]
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897286] no locks held by kswapd0/16.
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897291]
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897292] stack backtrace:
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897299] Pid: 16, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 3.1.1-main #8
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897306] Call Trace:
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897314] [<c0439e76>] ? printk+0xf/0x11
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897324] [<c01482d1>] print_usage_bug+0x20e/0x21a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897332] [<c01479b8>] ? print_irq_inversion_bug+0x172/0x172
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897341] [<c014855c>] mark_lock+0x27f/0x483
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897349] [<c0148d88>] __lock_acquire+0x628/0x1472
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897358] [<c0149fae>] lock_acquire+0x47/0x5e
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897366] [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897384] [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897397] [<c043b5ef>] mutex_lock_nested+0x35/0x26f
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897409] [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897421] [<c01f8bd4>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897433] [<c01e2edd>] map_block_for_writepage+0xc9/0x590
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897448] [<c01b1706>] ? create_empty_buffers+0x33/0x8f
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897461] [<c0121124>] ? get_parent_ip+0xb/0x31
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897472] [<c043ef7f>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x81/0x8e
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897485] [<c043cae0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x3d
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897496] [<c0121124>] ? get_parent_ip+0xb/0x31
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897508] [<c01e355d>] reiserfs_writepage+0x1b9/0x3e7
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897521] [<c0173b40>] ? clear_page_dirty_for_io+0xcb/0xde
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897533] [<c014a6e3>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x108/0x138
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897546] [<c014a71e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897559] [<c0177b38>] shrink_page_list+0x34f/0x5e2
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897572] [<c01780a7>] shrink_inactive_list+0x172/0x22c
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897585] [<c0178464>] shrink_zone+0x303/0x3b1
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897597] [<c043cae0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x3d
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897611] [<c01788c9>] kswapd+0x3b7/0x5f2
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897622] [<c01788c9>] ? kswapd+0x3b7/0x5f2
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897637] [<c0138cde>] ? wake_up_bit+0x1b/0x1b
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897649] [<c0178512>] ? shrink_zone+0x3b1/0x3b1
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897661] [<c0138a87>] kthread+0x61/0x66
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897673] [<c0138a26>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x42/0x42
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897686] [<c0440bba>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd
I don´t know exactly what I was doing at that time - probably I edited a _huge_ image gimp.
> [ Added a few more people to the cc ]
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Knut Petersen
> <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de> wrote:
>> After a " rm -r /verybigdir" (about 12G on a 25G reiserfs 3.6partition)
>> I found the following report about a circular locking dependency in
>> kernel 3.1.0
> Heh. There is even a comment about the ordering violation:
>
> /* We use I_MUTEX_CHILD here to silence lockdep. It's safe because xattr
> * mutation ops aren't called during rename or splace, which are the
> * only other users of I_MUTEX_CHILD. It violates the ordering, but that's
> * better than allocating another subclass just for this code. */
>
> and apparently the comment is wrong: we *do* end up looking up xattrs
> during splice, due to the security_inode_need_killpriv() thing.
>
> So I think this needs a suid (or sgid) file that has xattrs and is removed.
>
> That said, I suspect this is a false positive, because the actual
> unlink can never happen while somebody is splicing to/from the same
> file at the same time (because then the iput wouldn't be the last one
> for the inode, and the file removal would be delayed until the file
> has been closed for the last time).
>
> But the hacky use of "I_MUTEX_CHILD" is basically not the proper way
> to silence the lockdep splat.
>
> Anybody?
>
> Linus
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Subject: kernel 3.1.1 / 3.1.0 reiserfs locking problems
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:59:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC27039.6010904@t-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzuWD1xRhQNLfe0ey_-1vACwY=ofD5PXSzL_5UeDRbk8g@mail.gmail.com>
Am 31.10.2011 16:08, schrieb Linus Torvalds:
With kernel 3.1.1 there is another reiserfs related lock probleme:
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.896976]
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.896979] =================================
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.896990] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.896997] 3.1.1-main #8
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897001] ---------------------------------
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897007] inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage.
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897016] kswapd0/16 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897023] (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.?.}, at: [<c01f8bd4>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897044] {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} state was registered at:
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897050] [<c014a5b9>] mark_held_locks+0xae/0xd0
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897060] [<c014aab3>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0x7d/0x91
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897068] [<c0190ee0>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1a/0x93
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897078] [<c01e7728>] reiserfs_alloc_inode+0x13/0x3d
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897088] [<c01a5b06>] alloc_inode+0x14/0x5f
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897097] [<c01a5cb9>] iget5_locked+0x62/0x13a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897106] [<c01e99e0>] reiserfs_fill_super+0x410/0x8b9
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897114] [<c01953da>] mount_bdev+0x10b/0x159
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897123] [<c01e764d>] get_super_block+0x10/0x12
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897131] [<c0195b38>] mount_fs+0x59/0x12d
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897138] [<c01a80d1>] vfs_kern_mount+0x45/0x7a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897147] [<c01a83e3>] do_kern_mount+0x2f/0xb0
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897155] [<c01a987a>] do_mount+0x5c2/0x612
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897163] [<c01a9a72>] sys_mount+0x61/0x8f
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897170] [<c044060c>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897181] irq event stamp: 7509691
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897186] hardirqs last enabled at (7509691): [<c0190f34>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x6e/0x93
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897197] hardirqs last disabled at (7509690): [<c0190eea>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x24/0x93
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897209] softirqs last enabled at (7508896): [<c01294bd>] __do_softirq+0xee/0xfd
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897222] softirqs last disabled at (7508859): [<c01030ed>] do_softirq+0x50/0x9d
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897234]
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897235] other info that might help us debug this:
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897242] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897244]
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897250] CPU0
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897254] ----
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897257] lock(&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock);
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897265] <Interrupt>
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897269] lock(&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock);
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897276]
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897277] *** DEADLOCK ***
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897278]
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897286] no locks held by kswapd0/16.
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897291]
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897292] stack backtrace:
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897299] Pid: 16, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 3.1.1-main #8
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897306] Call Trace:
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897314] [<c0439e76>] ? printk+0xf/0x11
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897324] [<c01482d1>] print_usage_bug+0x20e/0x21a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897332] [<c01479b8>] ? print_irq_inversion_bug+0x172/0x172
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897341] [<c014855c>] mark_lock+0x27f/0x483
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897349] [<c0148d88>] __lock_acquire+0x628/0x1472
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897358] [<c0149fae>] lock_acquire+0x47/0x5e
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897366] [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897384] [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897397] [<c043b5ef>] mutex_lock_nested+0x35/0x26f
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897409] [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897421] [<c01f8bd4>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897433] [<c01e2edd>] map_block_for_writepage+0xc9/0x590
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897448] [<c01b1706>] ? create_empty_buffers+0x33/0x8f
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897461] [<c0121124>] ? get_parent_ip+0xb/0x31
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897472] [<c043ef7f>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x81/0x8e
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897485] [<c043cae0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x3d
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897496] [<c0121124>] ? get_parent_ip+0xb/0x31
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897508] [<c01e355d>] reiserfs_writepage+0x1b9/0x3e7
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897521] [<c0173b40>] ? clear_page_dirty_for_io+0xcb/0xde
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897533] [<c014a6e3>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x108/0x138
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897546] [<c014a71e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897559] [<c0177b38>] shrink_page_list+0x34f/0x5e2
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897572] [<c01780a7>] shrink_inactive_list+0x172/0x22c
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897585] [<c0178464>] shrink_zone+0x303/0x3b1
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897597] [<c043cae0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x3d
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897611] [<c01788c9>] kswapd+0x3b7/0x5f2
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897622] [<c01788c9>] ? kswapd+0x3b7/0x5f2
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897637] [<c0138cde>] ? wake_up_bit+0x1b/0x1b
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897649] [<c0178512>] ? shrink_zone+0x3b1/0x3b1
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897661] [<c0138a87>] kthread+0x61/0x66
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897673] [<c0138a26>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x42/0x42
Nov 15 11:37:27 golem kernel: [ 1986.897686] [<c0440bba>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd
I don´t know exactly what I was doing at that time - probably I edited a _huge_ image gimp.
> [ Added a few more people to the cc ]
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Knut Petersen
> <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de> wrote:
>> After a " rm -r /verybigdir" (about 12G on a 25G reiserfs 3.6partition)
>> I found the following report about a circular locking dependency in
>> kernel 3.1.0
> Heh. There is even a comment about the ordering violation:
>
> /* We use I_MUTEX_CHILD here to silence lockdep. It's safe because xattr
> * mutation ops aren't called during rename or splace, which are the
> * only other users of I_MUTEX_CHILD. It violates the ordering, but that's
> * better than allocating another subclass just for this code. */
>
> and apparently the comment is wrong: we *do* end up looking up xattrs
> during splice, due to the security_inode_need_killpriv() thing.
>
> So I think this needs a suid (or sgid) file that has xattrs and is removed.
>
> That said, I suspect this is a false positive, because the actual
> unlink can never happen while somebody is splicing to/from the same
> file at the same time (because then the iput wouldn't be the last one
> for the inode, and the file removal would be delayed until the file
> has been closed for the last time).
>
> But the hacky use of "I_MUTEX_CHILD" is basically not the proper way
> to silence the lockdep splat.
>
> Anybody?
>
> Linus
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-15 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-31 8:35 [BUG] kernel 3.1.0 possible circular locking dependency detected Knut Petersen
2011-10-31 15:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-31 15:59 ` Knut Petersen
2011-11-07 17:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-11-15 13:59 ` Knut Petersen [this message]
2011-11-15 13:59 ` kernel 3.1.1 / 3.1.0 reiserfs locking problems Knut Petersen
2011-11-15 18:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EC27039.6010904@t-online.de \
--to=knut_petersen@t-online.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.