All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	Patrice Vilchez <patrice.vilchez@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:44:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ECBB551.4@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ECBB226.4080404@free-electrons.com>

On 11/22/2011 03:31 PM, Maxime Ripard :
> Hi,
> 
> So, I guess that we have a pretty good driver with that version. What
> can we do for the inclusion in the kernel now ?

I propose that:

1/ We take the patch #1/3 for inclusion through arm-soc during 3.2
2/ Jonathan takes the #2/3 in his IIO subsystem
3/ We take board related patch #3/3 for inclusion during 3.3 (next)
4/ And we may add other boards support if we are quick for 3.3...

Does is sound good to all of you?

Bye,

> 
> Maxime
> 
> On 18/11/2011 11:12, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This patchset adds the driver for the ADC in the AT91 SoC. It has been tested on
>> the at91sam9g20ek and should work on sam9g45 as well.
>>
>> For now, it only reads values when asked for by sysfs, but eventually will
>> support hardware triggers and more boards.
>>
>> This patchset is based on the "[PATCH 0/6 V2] IIO: Out of staging step 1: The
>> core" patchset from Jonathan Cameron, applied on top of 3.1
>>
>> Improvements from v7:
>>   - Fix the channels mask bug
>>
>> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
>> Cc: Patrice Vilchez <patrice.vilchez@atmel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:44:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ECBB551.4@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ECBB226.4080404@free-electrons.com>

On 11/22/2011 03:31 PM, Maxime Ripard :
> Hi,
> 
> So, I guess that we have a pretty good driver with that version. What
> can we do for the inclusion in the kernel now ?

I propose that:

1/ We take the patch #1/3 for inclusion through arm-soc during 3.2
2/ Jonathan takes the #2/3 in his IIO subsystem
3/ We take board related patch #3/3 for inclusion during 3.3 (next)
4/ And we may add other boards support if we are quick for 3.3...

Does is sound good to all of you?

Bye,

> 
> Maxime
> 
> On 18/11/2011 11:12, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This patchset adds the driver for the ADC in the AT91 SoC. It has been tested on
>> the at91sam9g20ek and should work on sam9g45 as well.
>>
>> For now, it only reads values when asked for by sysfs, but eventually will
>> support hardware triggers and more boards.
>>
>> This patchset is based on the "[PATCH 0/6 V2] IIO: Out of staging step 1: The
>> core" patchset from Jonathan Cameron, applied on top of 3.1
>>
>> Improvements from v7:
>>   - Fix the channels mask bug
>>
>> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
>> Cc: Patrice Vilchez <patrice.vilchez@atmel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-22 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-18 10:12 [PATCH v8] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC Maxime Ripard
2011-11-18 10:12 ` Maxime Ripard
2011-11-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: AT91: Add platform data for the ADCs Maxime Ripard
2011-11-18 10:12   ` Maxime Ripard
2011-11-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: Add AT91 ADC driver Maxime Ripard
2011-11-18 10:12   ` Maxime Ripard
2011-11-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: AT91: Add the ADC to the sam9g20ek board Maxime Ripard
2011-11-18 10:12   ` Maxime Ripard
2011-11-22 14:31 ` [PATCH v8] AT91: Add a driver for the ADC Maxime Ripard
2011-11-22 14:31   ` Maxime Ripard
2011-11-22 14:44   ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2011-11-22 14:44     ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-11-22 21:02     ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-11-22 21:02       ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ECBB551.4@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=patrice.vilchez@atmel.com \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.