* btrfs/git question. @ 2011-11-28 17:53 Ken D'Ambrosio 2011-11-29 1:58 ` Phillip Susi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Ken D'Ambrosio @ 2011-11-28 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-btrfs Seems I've picked up a wireless regression, and randomly drop my WiFi connection with more recent kernels. While I'd love to try to track down the issue, the sporadic nature makes it difficult. But I don't want to revert to a flat-out old kernel because of all the btrfs modifications. Is it possible using git to add *just* btrfs patches to an older kernel? Thanks, -Ken ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: btrfs/git question. 2011-11-28 17:53 btrfs/git question Ken D'Ambrosio @ 2011-11-29 1:58 ` Phillip Susi 2011-11-29 2:33 ` Fajar A. Nugraha 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Phillip Susi @ 2011-11-29 1:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ken D'Ambrosio; +Cc: linux-btrfs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/28/2011 12:53 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote: > Seems I've picked up a wireless regression, and randomly drop my WiFi > connection with more recent kernels. While I'd love to try to track down the > issue, the sporadic nature makes it difficult. But I don't want to revert to a > flat-out old kernel because of all the btrfs modifications. Is it possible > using git to add *just* btrfs patches to an older kernel? Sure: use git rebase to apply the patches to the older kernel. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7UPDAACgkQJ4UciIs+XuLauQCgi9iTXZGD5BVTyTQJoc3Mm1R4 Oi8AmwX0oqwdF4e3dOTtAoUgFeYbKnOt =i3i2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: btrfs/git question. 2011-11-29 1:58 ` Phillip Susi @ 2011-11-29 2:33 ` Fajar A. Nugraha 2011-11-29 15:22 ` Chris Mason 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Fajar A. Nugraha @ 2011-11-29 2:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ken D'Ambrosio, linux-btrfs On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com> wrote: > On 11/28/2011 12:53 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote: >> Seems I've picked up a wireless regression, and randomly drop my WiF= i >> connection with more recent kernels. =A0While I'd love to try to tra= ck down the >> issue, the sporadic nature makes it difficult. =A0But I don't want t= o revert to a >> flat-out old kernel because of all the btrfs modifications. =A0Is it= possible >> using git to add *just* btrfs patches to an older kernel? > > Sure: use git rebase to apply the patches to the older kernel. =2E.. or use 3.1.2, and get ONLY fs/btrfs from Chris' for-linus tree, compile it out-of-tree, and use it to replace the original btrfs.ko. There used to be this: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/articles/b/t/r/Btrfs_source_repositories.= html#Building_latest_btrfs_against_a_recent_kernel_with_DKMS But personally it's much easier to just compile it manually without dkm= s: make -C /llib/modules/`uname -r`/build M=3D$(pwd) modules --=20 =46ajar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: btrfs/git question. 2011-11-29 2:33 ` Fajar A. Nugraha @ 2011-11-29 15:22 ` Chris Mason 2011-11-30 6:20 ` Fajar A. Nugraha 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Chris Mason @ 2011-11-29 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fajar A. Nugraha; +Cc: Ken D'Ambrosio, linux-btrfs On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:33:37AM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com> wrot= e: > > On 11/28/2011 12:53 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote: > >> Seems I've picked up a wireless regression, and randomly drop my W= iFi > >> connection with more recent kernels. =A0While I'd love to try to t= rack down the > >> issue, the sporadic nature makes it difficult. =A0But I don't want= to revert to a > >> flat-out old kernel because of all the btrfs modifications. =A0Is = it possible > >> using git to add *just* btrfs patches to an older kernel? > > > > Sure: use git rebase to apply the patches to the older kernel. >=20 > ... or use 3.1.2, and get ONLY fs/btrfs from Chris' for-linus tree, > compile it out-of-tree, and use it to replace the original btrfs.ko. If you're on a 3.1 kernel, you can pull my for-linus directly on top of it with git pull. I always keep a btrfs tree against the previous kernel so that people can use the latest btrfs goodness without having to use an rc kernel. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: btrfs/git question. 2011-11-29 15:22 ` Chris Mason @ 2011-11-30 6:20 ` Fajar A. Nugraha 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Fajar A. Nugraha @ 2011-11-30 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Mason, Ken D'Ambrosio, linux-btrfs On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> = wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:33:37AM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com> wro= te: >> > On 11/28/2011 12:53 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote: >> >> Seems I've picked up a wireless regression, and randomly drop my = WiFi >> >> connection with more recent kernels. =A0While I'd love to try to = track down the >> >> issue, the sporadic nature makes it difficult. =A0But I don't wan= t to revert to a >> >> flat-out old kernel because of all the btrfs modifications. =A0Is= it possible >> >> using git to add *just* btrfs patches to an older kernel? >> > >> > Sure: use git rebase to apply the patches to the older kernel. >> >> ... or use 3.1.2, and get ONLY fs/btrfs from Chris' for-linus tree, >> compile it out-of-tree, and use it to replace the original btrfs.ko. > > If you're on a 3.1 kernel, you can pull my for-linus directly on top = of > it with git pull. =A0I always keep a btrfs tree against the previous > kernel so that people can use the latest btrfs goodness without havin= g > to use an rc kernel. Yes, thanks for that. My suggestion is simply an alternative (instead of git pull) for people= who: - aren't quite familiar with git, but know enough to grab a directory snapshot from gitweb (e.g. http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git;a=3Dt= ree;f=3Dfs/btrfs;h=3D5f51bd7e3b8b6c4825681408450e6580bdbccce1;hb=3Drefs= /heads/for-linus) - know how to build a module out-of-tree - on the latest stable, but don't want to re-compile the whole kernel just to get btrfs fix --=20 =46ajar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-30 6:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-11-28 17:53 btrfs/git question Ken D'Ambrosio 2011-11-29 1:58 ` Phillip Susi 2011-11-29 2:33 ` Fajar A. Nugraha 2011-11-29 15:22 ` Chris Mason 2011-11-30 6:20 ` Fajar A. Nugraha
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.