From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
Gala Kumar-B11780 <B11780@freescale.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/85xx: consolidate of_platform_bus_probe calls
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:20:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED50633.4020506@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ED5058F.90004@freescale.com>
Timur Tabi wrote:
> If I move the "fsl,eloplus-dma" into mpc85xx_common_ids[], then everything works.
>
> I suspect there's some kind of state machine in of_platform_bus_probe() that allows it to find the DMA channel nodes if it's scanned everything else first. I'm trying to debug it now.
So why do we need mpc85xx_common_ids[] at all? Why can't of_platform_bus_probe() just scan the entire tree?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-29 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-17 17:56 [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/85xx: separate cpm2 pic init Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-11-17 17:56 ` [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/85xx: consolidate of_platform_bus_probe calls Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-11-24 7:15 ` Kumar Gala
2011-11-28 23:42 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2011-11-29 15:48 ` Kumar Gala
2011-11-29 16:17 ` Timur Tabi
2011-11-29 16:20 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2011-11-29 16:38 ` Kumar Gala
2011-11-29 18:52 ` Timur Tabi
2011-11-29 19:59 ` Kumar Gala
2011-11-29 22:53 ` Timur Tabi
2011-11-29 19:46 ` Scott Wood
2011-11-17 17:56 ` [PATCH 3/6] powerpc/85xx: separate MPIC handling code Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-11-17 18:30 ` Lee Nipper
2011-11-17 18:43 ` Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-11-17 21:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-17 21:33 ` Scott Wood
2011-11-17 17:56 ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc/85xx: unify common parts of *_setup_arch Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-11-17 17:56 ` [PATCH 5/6] powerpc/85xx: separate i8259 handling to common function Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-11-17 17:56 ` [PATCH 6/6] poewrpc/85xx: headers cleanup Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-11-17 21:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-24 7:15 ` [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/85xx: separate cpm2 pic init Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ED50633.4020506@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=B11780@freescale.com \
--cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.