From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
Gala Kumar-B11780 <B11780@freescale.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/85xx: consolidate of_platform_bus_probe calls
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:52:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED529E3.4090609@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2C30517A-CF00-455A-ABE4-CA92A8856C70@kernel.crashing.org>
Kumar Gala wrote:
> Ben would probably have to answer that. I can't remember why he wanted it. I'm sure he has a good reason.
Well, I'm not sure what's going on with the code. I *think* what's happening is that the first call of_platform_bus_probe() is scanning most, but not all, of the tree, and it's somehow reserving all of those nodes. Then we call of_platform_bus_probe() again, but it never finds the DMA nodes. of_platform_bus_probe() never actually calls of_platform_bus_create() this time around. Perhaps the recursive nature of of_platform_bus_create() is part of the problem.
The only fix I can think of is to move "fsl,eloplus-dma" into mpc85xx_common_ids[]. I'll post a patch that does that, and we can discuss it.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-29 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-17 17:56 [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/85xx: separate cpm2 pic init Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-11-17 17:56 ` [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/85xx: consolidate of_platform_bus_probe calls Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-11-24 7:15 ` Kumar Gala
2011-11-28 23:42 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2011-11-29 15:48 ` Kumar Gala
2011-11-29 16:17 ` Timur Tabi
2011-11-29 16:20 ` Timur Tabi
2011-11-29 16:38 ` Kumar Gala
2011-11-29 18:52 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2011-11-29 19:59 ` Kumar Gala
2011-11-29 22:53 ` Timur Tabi
2011-11-29 19:46 ` Scott Wood
2011-11-17 17:56 ` [PATCH 3/6] powerpc/85xx: separate MPIC handling code Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-11-17 18:30 ` Lee Nipper
2011-11-17 18:43 ` Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-11-17 21:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-17 21:33 ` Scott Wood
2011-11-17 17:56 ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc/85xx: unify common parts of *_setup_arch Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-11-17 17:56 ` [PATCH 5/6] powerpc/85xx: separate i8259 handling to common function Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-11-17 17:56 ` [PATCH 6/6] poewrpc/85xx: headers cleanup Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
2011-11-17 21:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-24 7:15 ` [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/85xx: separate cpm2 pic init Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ED529E3.4090609@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=B11780@freescale.com \
--cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.