* VFAT i_pos value
@ 2011-11-30 22:33 Kai Meyer
2011-11-30 23:22 ` Abhijit Hoskeri
2011-12-01 14:38 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kai Meyer @ 2011-11-30 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
I'm getting this error:
FAT: Filesystem error (dev sblsnap0)
fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 523791)
I'm wondering if there was a way to figure out what sector is causing
the error? I would like to try and track down what is changing that
sector and fix the problem. Is there a straight forward way to convert
i_pos to a sector value? I've been staring at the fat.c and fat.h code
all morning, and I'm having trouble grok'ing the flow.
-Kai Meyer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* VFAT i_pos value 2011-11-30 22:33 VFAT i_pos value Kai Meyer @ 2011-11-30 23:22 ` Abhijit Hoskeri 2011-12-01 14:38 ` OGAWA Hirofumi 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Abhijit Hoskeri @ 2011-11-30 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernelnewbies On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Kai Meyer <kai@gnukai.com> wrote: > I'm getting this error: > FAT: Filesystem error (dev sblsnap0) > ? ? fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 523791) Do you know what file this error is related to? If you do, then you could see which blocks belong to the file and calculate the block based on the above offset and the filesystem block size. Regards, Abhijit ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* VFAT i_pos value 2011-11-30 22:33 VFAT i_pos value Kai Meyer 2011-11-30 23:22 ` Abhijit Hoskeri @ 2011-12-01 14:38 ` OGAWA Hirofumi 2011-12-01 16:38 ` Kai Meyer 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: OGAWA Hirofumi @ 2011-12-01 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernelnewbies Kai Meyer <kai@gnukai.com> writes: > I'm getting this error: > FAT: Filesystem error (dev sblsnap0) > fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 523791) > > I'm wondering if there was a way to figure out what sector is causing > the error? I would like to try and track down what is changing that > sector and fix the problem. Is there a straight forward way to convert > i_pos to a sector value? I've been staring at the fat.c and fat.h code > all morning, and I'm having trouble grok'ing the flow. The i_pos means directory entry (contains inode information in unix-fs) position, block number == i_pos / (logical-blocksize / 32) offset == i_pos & (logical-blocksize / 32) the above position's directory entry contains information for problematic file. This is how to use i_pos information. FWIW, in this error case, the cluster chain in FAT table which is pointed by that entry, it has invalid cluster value. Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* VFAT i_pos value 2011-12-01 14:38 ` OGAWA Hirofumi @ 2011-12-01 16:38 ` Kai Meyer 2011-12-01 19:20 ` OGAWA Hirofumi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Kai Meyer @ 2011-12-01 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernelnewbies On 12/01/2011 07:38 AM, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > Kai Meyer<kai@gnukai.com> writes: > >> I'm getting this error: >> FAT: Filesystem error (dev sblsnap0) >> fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 523791) >> >> I'm wondering if there was a way to figure out what sector is causing >> the error? I would like to try and track down what is changing that >> sector and fix the problem. Is there a straight forward way to convert >> i_pos to a sector value? I've been staring at the fat.c and fat.h code >> all morning, and I'm having trouble grok'ing the flow. > The i_pos means directory entry (contains inode information in unix-fs) > position, > > block number == i_pos / (logical-blocksize / 32) > offset == i_pos& (logical-blocksize / 32) > > the above position's directory entry contains information for > problematic file. This is how to use i_pos information. > > FWIW, in this error case, the cluster chain in FAT table which is > pointed by that entry, it has invalid cluster value. > > Thanks. If you would verify my math for me, I would appreciate it. In this case, my logical block size is 4096, because byte 13 of the 8Gb file system is 8, and I take that to be 8 * 512, which is 4096. So: block_number = 523791 / (4096 / 32) = 4092 offset = 523791 % (4096 / 32) = 15 // I assume you meant modulo in your original post, and not binary AND. So if the block_number is 4092, I would multiply that by 8 (sectors per logical block) to get the sector number: 32736 Does the error indicate that sector contains the corrupted data? Or is it the sector that contains the information that points to the corrupted data? Or is it something entirely different? -Kai Meyer ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* VFAT i_pos value 2011-12-01 16:38 ` Kai Meyer @ 2011-12-01 19:20 ` OGAWA Hirofumi 2011-12-01 20:46 ` Kai Meyer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: OGAWA Hirofumi @ 2011-12-01 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernelnewbies Kai Meyer <kai@gnukai.com> writes: >> The i_pos means directory entry (contains inode information in unix-fs) >> position, >> >> block number == i_pos / (logical-blocksize / 32) >> offset == i_pos& (logical-blocksize / 32) >> >> the above position's directory entry contains information for >> problematic file. This is how to use i_pos information. >> >> FWIW, in this error case, the cluster chain in FAT table which is >> pointed by that entry, it has invalid cluster value. >> >> Thanks. > > If you would verify my math for me, I would appreciate it. > > In this case, my logical block size is 4096, because byte 13 of the 8Gb > file system is 8, and I take that to be 8 * 512, which is 4096. So: > > block_number = 523791 / (4096 / 32) = 4092 > offset = 523791 % (4096 / 32) = 15 // I assume you meant modulo in your > original post, and not binary AND. Whoops, you are right. (I forgot "-1") > So if the block_number is 4092, I would multiply that by 8 (sectors per > logical block) to get the sector number: > 32736 Right. > Does the error indicate that sector contains the corrupted data? No. > Or is it the sector that contains the information that points to the > corrupted data? Right. The i_pos is pointing a directory entry (include/linux/msdos_fs.h: struct msdos_dir_entry). And starthi (if FAT32) and start contain the pointer to next cluster number. That message was outputted when walking in cluster chain. If you want to see actual corrupted data, you can check the cluster chain by pointing from that directory entry. Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* VFAT i_pos value 2011-12-01 19:20 ` OGAWA Hirofumi @ 2011-12-01 20:46 ` Kai Meyer 2011-12-03 6:20 ` OGAWA Hirofumi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Kai Meyer @ 2011-12-01 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernelnewbies On 12/01/2011 12:20 PM, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > Kai Meyer<kai@gnukai.com> writes: > >>> The i_pos means directory entry (contains inode information in unix-fs) >>> position, >>> >>> block number == i_pos / (logical-blocksize / 32) >>> offset == i_pos& (logical-blocksize / 32) >>> >>> the above position's directory entry contains information for >>> problematic file. This is how to use i_pos information. >>> >>> FWIW, in this error case, the cluster chain in FAT table which is >>> pointed by that entry, it has invalid cluster value. >>> >>> Thanks. >> If you would verify my math for me, I would appreciate it. >> >> In this case, my logical block size is 4096, because byte 13 of the 8Gb >> file system is 8, and I take that to be 8 * 512, which is 4096. So: >> >> block_number = 523791 / (4096 / 32) = 4092 >> offset = 523791 % (4096 / 32) = 15 // I assume you meant modulo in your >> original post, and not binary AND. > Whoops, you are right. (I forgot "-1") > >> So if the block_number is 4092, I would multiply that by 8 (sectors per >> logical block) to get the sector number: >> 32736 > Right. > >> Does the error indicate that sector contains the corrupted data? > No. > >> Or is it the sector that contains the information that points to the >> corrupted data? > Right. > > The i_pos is pointing a directory entry (include/linux/msdos_fs.h: > struct msdos_dir_entry). > > And starthi (if FAT32) and start contain the pointer to next cluster > number. That message was outputted when walking in cluster chain. > > If you want to see actual corrupted data, you can check the cluster > chain by pointing from that directory entry. > > Thanks. Thanks for the helpful response. I'm not entirely sure I understand the next part though. I hacked a dirty entry dumper tool: #include <stdio.h> #include <linux/msdos_fs.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <string.h> int main(int argc, char** argv) { off_t pos = atoi(argv[2]); unsigned long block; off_t sector; unsigned int offset; int fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY); char buf[512]; struct msdos_dir_entry dirent; block = pos / (4096 / 32); sector = block * 8; offset = pos % (4096 / 32); printf("block %lu, sector %lu, offset %u\n", block, sector, offset); lseek(fd, sector * 512, SEEK_SET); if (read(fd, buf, 512) < 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Unable to read from device %s\n", argv[1]); return -1; } memcpy(&dirent, buf + offset, sizeof(dirent)); printf("name %s\n", dirent.name); printf("attr %u\n", dirent.attr); printf("lcase %u\n", dirent.lcase); printf("ctime_cs %u\n", dirent.ctime_cs); printf("ctime %u\n", dirent.ctime); printf("cdate %u\n", dirent.cdate); printf("adate %u\n", dirent.adate); printf("starthi %u\n", dirent.starthi); printf("time %u\n", dirent.time); printf("date %u\n", dirent.date); printf("start %u\n", dirent.start); printf("size %u\n", dirent.size); } Here's what it outputs: ./vfat_entry /dev/sblsnap0 523793 block 4092, sector 32736, offset 17 name attr 255 lcase 255 ctime_cs 255 ctime 12799 cdate 12670 adate 8224 starthi 8224 time 23072 date 21061 start 32 size 2171155456 So, I take starthi, and shift 16 bits left, then and in the start value. That should give me the byte address of the first cluster of the file, correct? Then I need to follow the cluster chain until I get a bad value. Thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* VFAT i_pos value 2011-12-01 20:46 ` Kai Meyer @ 2011-12-03 6:20 ` OGAWA Hirofumi 2011-12-03 6:23 ` OGAWA Hirofumi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: OGAWA Hirofumi @ 2011-12-03 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernelnewbies Kai Meyer <kai@gnukai.com> writes: > Thanks for the helpful response. I'm not entirely sure I understand the > next part though. I hacked a dirty entry dumper tool: > > #include <stdio.h> > #include <linux/msdos_fs.h> > #include <sys/types.h> > #include <sys/stat.h> > #include <fcntl.h> > #include <unistd.h> > #include <string.h> > > int main(int argc, char** argv) > { > off_t pos = atoi(argv[2]); > unsigned long block; > off_t sector; > unsigned int offset; > int fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY); > char buf[512]; > struct msdos_dir_entry dirent; > block = pos / (4096 / 32); > sector = block * 8; > offset = pos % (4096 / 32); > printf("block %lu, sector %lu, offset %u\n", block, sector, > offset); > lseek(fd, sector * 512, SEEK_SET); > if (read(fd, buf, 512) < 0) { > fprintf(stderr, "Unable to read from device %s\n", > argv[1]); > return -1; > } > memcpy(&dirent, buf + offset, sizeof(dirent)); > printf("name %s\n", dirent.name); > printf("attr %u\n", dirent.attr); > printf("lcase %u\n", dirent.lcase); > printf("ctime_cs %u\n", dirent.ctime_cs); > printf("ctime %u\n", dirent.ctime); > printf("cdate %u\n", dirent.cdate); > printf("adate %u\n", dirent.adate); > printf("starthi %u\n", dirent.starthi); > printf("time %u\n", dirent.time); > printf("date %u\n", dirent.date); > printf("start %u\n", dirent.start); > printf("size %u\n", dirent.size); > } > > Here's what it outputs: > > ./vfat_entry /dev/sblsnap0 523793 > block 4092, sector 32736, offset 17 > name > attr 255 > lcase 255 > ctime_cs 255 > ctime 12799 > cdate 12670 > adate 8224 > starthi 8224 > time 23072 > date 21061 > start 32 > size 2171155456 > > So, I take starthi, and shift 16 bits left, then and in the start value. > That should give me the byte address of the first cluster of the file, > correct? > > Then I need to follow the cluster chain until I get a bad value. It looks like wrong as dirent. Did you use 523793 really? If so, I think 523791 is correct value. :) -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* VFAT i_pos value 2011-12-03 6:20 ` OGAWA Hirofumi @ 2011-12-03 6:23 ` OGAWA Hirofumi 2011-12-08 21:35 ` Kai Meyer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: OGAWA Hirofumi @ 2011-12-03 6:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernelnewbies OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> writes: > Kai Meyer <kai@gnukai.com> writes: > >> Thanks for the helpful response. I'm not entirely sure I understand the >> next part though. I hacked a dirty entry dumper tool: >> >> #include <stdio.h> >> #include <linux/msdos_fs.h> >> #include <sys/types.h> >> #include <sys/stat.h> >> #include <fcntl.h> >> #include <unistd.h> >> #include <string.h> >> >> int main(int argc, char** argv) >> { >> off_t pos = atoi(argv[2]); >> unsigned long block; >> off_t sector; >> unsigned int offset; >> int fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY); >> char buf[512]; >> struct msdos_dir_entry dirent; >> block = pos / (4096 / 32); >> sector = block * 8; >> offset = pos % (4096 / 32); >> printf("block %lu, sector %lu, offset %u\n", block, sector, >> offset); >> lseek(fd, sector * 512, SEEK_SET); >> if (read(fd, buf, 512) < 0) { >> fprintf(stderr, "Unable to read from device %s\n", >> argv[1]); >> return -1; >> } >> memcpy(&dirent, buf + offset, sizeof(dirent)); >> printf("name %s\n", dirent.name); >> printf("attr %u\n", dirent.attr); >> printf("lcase %u\n", dirent.lcase); >> printf("ctime_cs %u\n", dirent.ctime_cs); >> printf("ctime %u\n", dirent.ctime); >> printf("cdate %u\n", dirent.cdate); >> printf("adate %u\n", dirent.adate); >> printf("starthi %u\n", dirent.starthi); >> printf("time %u\n", dirent.time); >> printf("date %u\n", dirent.date); >> printf("start %u\n", dirent.start); >> printf("size %u\n", dirent.size); >> } >> >> Here's what it outputs: >> >> ./vfat_entry /dev/sblsnap0 523793 >> block 4092, sector 32736, offset 17 >> name >> attr 255 >> lcase 255 >> ctime_cs 255 >> ctime 12799 >> cdate 12670 >> adate 8224 >> starthi 8224 >> time 23072 >> date 21061 >> start 32 >> size 2171155456 >> >> So, I take starthi, and shift 16 bits left, then and in the start value. >> That should give me the byte address of the first cluster of the file, >> correct? >> >> Then I need to follow the cluster chain until I get a bad value. > > It looks like wrong as dirent. Did you use 523793 really? If so, I think > 523791 is correct value. :) And I didn't mention about offset correctly. offset means number of entries, not bytes offset. So, bytes offset is "buf + offset * 32". (32 == sizeof(struct msdos_dir_entry)) Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* VFAT i_pos value 2011-12-03 6:23 ` OGAWA Hirofumi @ 2011-12-08 21:35 ` Kai Meyer 2011-12-09 11:01 ` OGAWA Hirofumi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Kai Meyer @ 2011-12-08 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernelnewbies On 12/02/2011 11:23 PM, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > OGAWA Hirofumi<hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> writes: > >> Kai Meyer<kai@gnukai.com> writes: >> >>> Thanks for the helpful response. I'm not entirely sure I understand the >>> next part though. I hacked a dirty entry dumper tool: >>> >>> #include<stdio.h> >>> #include<linux/msdos_fs.h> >>> #include<sys/types.h> >>> #include<sys/stat.h> >>> #include<fcntl.h> >>> #include<unistd.h> >>> #include<string.h> >>> >>> int main(int argc, char** argv) >>> { >>> off_t pos = atoi(argv[2]); >>> unsigned long block; >>> off_t sector; >>> unsigned int offset; >>> int fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY); >>> char buf[512]; >>> struct msdos_dir_entry dirent; >>> block = pos / (4096 / 32); >>> sector = block * 8; >>> offset = pos % (4096 / 32); >>> printf("block %lu, sector %lu, offset %u\n", block, sector, >>> offset); >>> lseek(fd, sector * 512, SEEK_SET); >>> if (read(fd, buf, 512)< 0) { >>> fprintf(stderr, "Unable to read from device %s\n", >>> argv[1]); >>> return -1; >>> } >>> memcpy(&dirent, buf + offset, sizeof(dirent)); >>> printf("name %s\n", dirent.name); >>> printf("attr %u\n", dirent.attr); >>> printf("lcase %u\n", dirent.lcase); >>> printf("ctime_cs %u\n", dirent.ctime_cs); >>> printf("ctime %u\n", dirent.ctime); >>> printf("cdate %u\n", dirent.cdate); >>> printf("adate %u\n", dirent.adate); >>> printf("starthi %u\n", dirent.starthi); >>> printf("time %u\n", dirent.time); >>> printf("date %u\n", dirent.date); >>> printf("start %u\n", dirent.start); >>> printf("size %u\n", dirent.size); >>> } >>> >>> Here's what it outputs: >>> >>> ./vfat_entry /dev/sblsnap0 523793 >>> block 4092, sector 32736, offset 17 >>> name >>> attr 255 >>> lcase 255 >>> ctime_cs 255 >>> ctime 12799 >>> cdate 12670 >>> adate 8224 >>> starthi 8224 >>> time 23072 >>> date 21061 >>> start 32 >>> size 2171155456 >>> >>> So, I take starthi, and shift 16 bits left, then and in the start value. >>> That should give me the byte address of the first cluster of the file, >>> correct? >>> >>> Then I need to follow the cluster chain until I get a bad value. >> It looks like wrong as dirent. Did you use 523793 really? If so, I think >> 523791 is correct value. :) > And I didn't mention about offset correctly. offset means number of > entries, not bytes offset. So, bytes offset is "buf + offset * 32". > (32 == sizeof(struct msdos_dir_entry)) > > Thanks. Ok, I fixed the buf + offset * 32. I have a new volume, so the error is now: fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 523781) I added a few lines at the end to print the start value: pos = dirent.starthi << 16; pos |= dirent.start; printf("next pos: %u\n", sector); [root at dev1 sblsnap]# ./vfat_entry /dev/sblsnap0 523781 block 4092, sector 32736, offset 5 name 3~1 ZER attr 32 lcase 0 ctime_cs 100 ctime 29092 cdate 16264 adate 16264 starthi 4 time 29092 date 16264 start 7427 size 37748736 next pos: 32736 [root@dev1 sblsnap]# ./vfat_entry /dev/sblsnap0 32736 block 255, sector 2040, offset 96 name attr 0 lcase 0 ctime_cs 0 ctime 0 cdate 0 adate 0 starthi 0 time 0 date 0 start 0 size 0 next pos: 2040 Does that look like what would be causing my error? meaning, sector 2040 has bad data? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* VFAT i_pos value 2011-12-08 21:35 ` Kai Meyer @ 2011-12-09 11:01 ` OGAWA Hirofumi 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: OGAWA Hirofumi @ 2011-12-09 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernelnewbies Kai Meyer <kai@gnukai.com> writes: > [root at dev1 sblsnap]# ./vfat_entry /dev/sblsnap0 523781 > block 4092, sector 32736, offset 5 > name 3~1 ZER > attr 32 > lcase 0 > ctime_cs 100 > ctime 29092 > cdate 16264 > adate 16264 > starthi 4 > time 29092 > date 16264 > start 7427 > size 37748736 > next pos: 32736 Looks like sane entry. > [root at dev1 sblsnap]# ./vfat_entry /dev/sblsnap0 32736 > block 255, sector 2040, offset 96 > name > attr 0 > lcase 0 > ctime_cs 0 > ctime 0 > cdate 0 > adate 0 > starthi 0 > time 0 > date 0 > start 0 > size 0 > next pos: 2040 > > Does that look like what would be causing my error? meaning, sector 2040 > has bad data? The next pos means the position of data cluster (i.e that entry is using the cluster of this position to store data). You have to walk the cluster position chain on FAT table, not directory entry. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-12-09 11:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-11-30 22:33 VFAT i_pos value Kai Meyer 2011-11-30 23:22 ` Abhijit Hoskeri 2011-12-01 14:38 ` OGAWA Hirofumi 2011-12-01 16:38 ` Kai Meyer 2011-12-01 19:20 ` OGAWA Hirofumi 2011-12-01 20:46 ` Kai Meyer 2011-12-03 6:20 ` OGAWA Hirofumi 2011-12-03 6:23 ` OGAWA Hirofumi 2011-12-08 21:35 ` Kai Meyer 2011-12-09 11:01 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.