From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, JBottomley@parallels.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: prevent inlining in arxescsi.c causing build failures
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:46:11 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED75AF3.2090901@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111201080613.GF26618@pengutronix.de>
Hello.
On 01.12.2011 12:06, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> The following failure is seen in routine coverage builds:
>> CC [M] drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.o
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s: Assembler messages:
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:334: Error: symbol `.loop_1' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:337: Error: symbol `.loop_2' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:343: Error: symbol `.loop_3' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:365: Error: symbol `.loop_1' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:368: Error: symbol `.loop_2' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:374: Error: symbol `.loop_3' is already defined
>> make[4]: *** [drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.o] Error 1
>> It is caused by multiple inline of arxescsi_pseudo_dma_write()
>> which is responsible for the above labels. Marking the fcn
>> as non-inline fixes the issue.
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker<paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> Is that a compiler or a code issue? If it's the compiler please fix
> that. If it's the code, then please document why you added the noinline.
> Having said that, "my" compiler compiles drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.o
> just fine (using rpc_defconfig on v3.2-rc2).
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c b/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c
>> index a750aa7..2608a9e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c
>> @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ arxescsi_dma_setup(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_pointer *SCp,
>> return fasdma_pseudo;
>> }
>>
>> -static void arxescsi_pseudo_dma_write(unsigned char *addr, void __iomem *base)
>> +static noinline void
>> +arxescsi_pseudo_dma_write(unsigned char *addr, void __iomem *base)
> Shouldn't this line get some indention?
No, usually such lines don't get indented.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com (Sergei Shtylyov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: prevent inlining in arxescsi.c causing build failures
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:46:11 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED75AF3.2090901@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111201080613.GF26618@pengutronix.de>
Hello.
On 01.12.2011 12:06, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
>> The following failure is seen in routine coverage builds:
>> CC [M] drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.o
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s: Assembler messages:
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:334: Error: symbol `.loop_1' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:337: Error: symbol `.loop_2' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:343: Error: symbol `.loop_3' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:365: Error: symbol `.loop_1' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:368: Error: symbol `.loop_2' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:374: Error: symbol `.loop_3' is already defined
>> make[4]: *** [drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.o] Error 1
>> It is caused by multiple inline of arxescsi_pseudo_dma_write()
>> which is responsible for the above labels. Marking the fcn
>> as non-inline fixes the issue.
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker<paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> Is that a compiler or a code issue? If it's the compiler please fix
> that. If it's the code, then please document why you added the noinline.
> Having said that, "my" compiler compiles drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.o
> just fine (using rpc_defconfig on v3.2-rc2).
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c b/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c
>> index a750aa7..2608a9e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c
>> @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ arxescsi_dma_setup(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_pointer *SCp,
>> return fasdma_pseudo;
>> }
>>
>> -static void arxescsi_pseudo_dma_write(unsigned char *addr, void __iomem *base)
>> +static noinline void
>> +arxescsi_pseudo_dma_write(unsigned char *addr, void __iomem *base)
> Shouldn't this line get some indention?
No, usually such lines don't get indented.
WBR, Sergei
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, JBottomley@parallels.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: prevent inlining in arxescsi.c causing build failures
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:46:11 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED75AF3.2090901@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111201080613.GF26618@pengutronix.de>
Hello.
On 01.12.2011 12:06, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> The following failure is seen in routine coverage builds:
>> CC [M] drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.o
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s: Assembler messages:
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:334: Error: symbol `.loop_1' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:337: Error: symbol `.loop_2' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:343: Error: symbol `.loop_3' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:365: Error: symbol `.loop_1' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:368: Error: symbol `.loop_2' is already defined
>> /tmp/cccEyiO7.s:374: Error: symbol `.loop_3' is already defined
>> make[4]: *** [drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.o] Error 1
>> It is caused by multiple inline of arxescsi_pseudo_dma_write()
>> which is responsible for the above labels. Marking the fcn
>> as non-inline fixes the issue.
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker<paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> Is that a compiler or a code issue? If it's the compiler please fix
> that. If it's the code, then please document why you added the noinline.
> Having said that, "my" compiler compiles drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.o
> just fine (using rpc_defconfig on v3.2-rc2).
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c b/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c
>> index a750aa7..2608a9e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/arm/arxescsi.c
>> @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ arxescsi_dma_setup(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_pointer *SCp,
>> return fasdma_pseudo;
>> }
>>
>> -static void arxescsi_pseudo_dma_write(unsigned char *addr, void __iomem *base)
>> +static noinline void
>> +arxescsi_pseudo_dma_write(unsigned char *addr, void __iomem *base)
> Shouldn't this line get some indention?
No, usually such lines don't get indented.
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-01 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-01 4:26 [PATCH] arm: prevent inlining in arxescsi.c causing build failures Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-01 4:26 ` Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-01 8:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-12-01 8:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-12-01 10:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2011-12-01 10:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-12-01 10:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-12-01 14:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-01 14:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-22 19:16 Paul Gortmaker
2012-01-22 19:16 ` Paul Gortmaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ED75AF3.2090901@ru.mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.