From: Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gmp: also generate the libgmpcxx library & package it properly
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:42:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED810D7.1040204@balister.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1791C583-61A2-4087-8250-255FA25DAB22@dominion.thruhere.net>
On 12/01/2011 12:26 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 1 dec. 2011, om 18:17 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 16:57 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 14:51 -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>>>> Thank you for the explanation. BTW where can I find official rules about signed-off-by line
>>>
>>> The "Signed-off-by" idiom originated with the kernel people and
>>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches in the linux source tree contains a
>>> fairly good description of what it means to them.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure that there are any official rules about its use in OE apart
>>> from what's in the Commit Patch Message Guidelines (see the wiki).
>>
>> The yocto docs do mention what the specific meaning of the line is.
>
> <pedantic mode>But this is oe-core.</pedantic mode>. Shall we all agree it's the same for OE-core as well?
Yes. No sense having the same phrases mean different things in different
layers.
Philip
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-01 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-29 19:30 [PATCH 0/4] Misc recipe fixes nitin.a.kamble
2011-11-29 19:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] gmp: also generate the libgmpcxx library & package it properly nitin.a.kamble
2011-11-29 19:37 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-29 20:20 ` Phil Blundell
2011-11-29 21:08 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-11-29 21:12 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-29 21:43 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-11-29 22:05 ` Phil Blundell
2011-11-29 22:51 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-12-01 16:57 ` Phil Blundell
2011-12-01 17:17 ` Richard Purdie
2011-12-01 17:26 ` Koen Kooi
2011-12-01 18:37 ` Joshua Lock
2011-12-01 19:29 ` Koen Kooi
2011-12-01 23:42 ` Philip Balister [this message]
2011-11-29 19:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] binutils: fix for .debug files QA warnings nitin.a.kamble
2011-11-29 19:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] libtool: Upgrade from 2.4 -> 2.4.2 nitin.a.kamble
2011-11-29 19:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] libx11-trip_1.4.4: fix the source tarall checksums nitin.a.kamble
2011-11-29 19:38 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-29 19:40 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2011-12-01 20:41 ` [PATCH 0/4] Misc recipe fixes Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ED810D7.1040204@balister.org \
--to=philip@balister.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.