From: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com>
To: Peter Horton <phorton@bitbox.co.uk>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MTD: modify mtd api to return bitflip info on read operations
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 05:52:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDB7B1D.60603@newsguy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EDB3295.6040201@bitbox.co.uk>
On 12/04/2011 12:43 AM, Peter Horton wrote:
> On 03/12/2011 20:20, Mike Dunn wrote:
>>
>> This patch proposes a change to the mtd API for the purpose of returning to
>> the caller information on the number of bit errors corrected by the ecc
>> facilities of the device during read operations. The affected functions are
>> read() and read_oob().
>>
>
> Do the number of bit-flips mean anything to the higher layers like UBI?
The change was motivated primarily by the desire to get ubifs working well on
nand flash. Currently it works well only on onenand devices where single
bitflips are rare and random. On nand with frequent and consistent bitflips,
ubi marks a large portion of the blocks as "bad".
> As the ECC strength / error rate are a chip dependent thing how do the higher
> layers know what is good/normal/bad?
Good point. To be determined. Probably just another element in the mtd_info
struct named ecc_strength or some such. UBI e.g., can determine a suitable
"scrublevel" based on that.
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-04 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-03 20:20 [PATCH v2] MTD: modify mtd api to return bitflip info on read operations Mike Dunn
2011-12-04 8:43 ` Peter Horton
2011-12-04 13:52 ` Mike Dunn [this message]
2011-12-04 14:43 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-04 14:55 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-05 6:07 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-05 16:58 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-05 17:09 ` Peter Horton
2011-12-05 18:57 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-06 21:52 ` Robert Jarzmik
2011-12-07 2:16 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-07 8:01 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-12-07 18:32 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-12 12:48 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-14 20:46 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-16 10:09 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-07 9:42 ` Peter Horton
2011-12-07 18:33 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-04 14:33 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-05 6:23 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-05 18:13 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-05 21:16 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EDB7B1D.60603@newsguy.com \
--to=mikedunn@newsguy.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=phorton@bitbox.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.