From: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com>
To: Ricard Wanderlof <ricard.wanderlof@axis.com>
Cc: Peter Horton <phorton@bitbox.co.uk>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
"dedekind1@gmail.com" <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MTD: modify mtd api to return bitflip info on read operations
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:32:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDFB142.6050208@newsguy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1112070848340.32119@lnxricardw.se.axis.com>
Hi Ricard, thanks for chiming in.
On 12/07/2011 12:01 AM, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
>
>
> So, something like this:
> - The driver reports number of bit flips and current ECC strength etc to
> the mtd layer.
> - Based on some userspace knob, the mtd framework reports -EUCLEAN if
> scrubbing is needed.
> - Upper layers perform scrubbing if they want to (i.e. UBI) or not (i.e.
> JFFS2).
Sounds like a nice compromise between user configurability and keeping the
decision in the mtd layer. The problem is that the read method currently goes
directly to the driver, so all drivers would have to be patched. The last patch
I submitted was rejected as being too large. And it can't be broken into
smaller patches because they are interdependent and not bisectable.
Implementing this scheme would be an even larger patch, and the changes made to
every driver would bear scrutiny.
>
> I don't really see this as lying, more of a redefinition of what -EUCLEAN
> really means. The current behavior was invented when single-bit errors could
> be correct and nothing else,
That is clear. In mtdconcat.c, ecc_stats.corrected is incremented by one when
mtd->read() returns -EUCLEAN.
> and furthermore such bitflips were rare; now that multiple-bit errors are
> commonplace it's time to put more detail into what -EUCLEAN implies. It's not
> really breaking anything old either, if sane defaults are used.
>
I'm willing to implement whatever consensus emerges, but I need buy-in from the
maintainers before I spend more time on it.
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-07 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-03 20:20 [PATCH v2] MTD: modify mtd api to return bitflip info on read operations Mike Dunn
2011-12-04 8:43 ` Peter Horton
2011-12-04 13:52 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-04 14:43 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-04 14:55 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-05 6:07 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-05 16:58 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-05 17:09 ` Peter Horton
2011-12-05 18:57 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-06 21:52 ` Robert Jarzmik
2011-12-07 2:16 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-07 8:01 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-12-07 18:32 ` Mike Dunn [this message]
2011-12-12 12:48 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-14 20:46 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-16 10:09 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-07 9:42 ` Peter Horton
2011-12-07 18:33 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-04 14:33 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-05 6:23 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-05 18:13 ` Mike Dunn
2011-12-05 21:16 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EDFB142.6050208@newsguy.com \
--to=mikedunn@newsguy.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=phorton@bitbox.co.uk \
--cc=ricard.wanderlof@axis.com \
--cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.