All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: KEXEC: fix kexec_get_range_compat to fail vocally
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 13:01:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDCC0AE.1030100@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EDCCDE802000078000656A1@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On 05/12/11 12:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 05.12.11 at 12:35, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> I am not sure that this is the only instance, but it is really not
>> acceptable to hand truncated pointers or sizes for physical memory to dom0.
> While I agree to the change, I think we also ought to add a new flavor
> of KEXEC_CMD_kexec_get_range that is 64-bit capable even for a
> 32-bit Dom0.

Agreed - I am working on introducing a new hypercall right now.

> Both under the assumption that apart from the truncation nothing
> prevents addresses above the 4G boundary from being usable with
> a 32-bit kernel for at least one of the ranges (probably only
> KEXEC_RANGE_MA_CPU and KEXEC_RANGE_MA_VMCOREINFO are
> candidates for this on x86).

Will those ranges not be covered by my patch?

> Jan
>

-- 
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-05 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-05 11:35 KEXEC: fix kexec_get_range_compat to fail vocally Andrew Cooper
2011-12-05 12:58 ` Jan Beulich
2011-12-05 13:01   ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2011-12-05 13:18     ` Jan Beulich
2011-12-05 13:39       ` Andrew Cooper
2011-12-05 19:46 ` Keir Fraser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EDCC0AE.1030100@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.