From: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Jingoo Han <jg1.han-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: 'Kukjin Kim' <kgene.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-samsung-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
'Greg Kroah-Hartman' <gregkh-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
'Alan Stern'
<stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>,
'Yulgon Kim' <yulgon.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI device
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:43:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDDDCAB.1000001@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001301ccb3e0$b5fec280$21fc4780$%han-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
On Tuesday 06 December 2011 12:01 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> This patch adds USB ohci device definition for Exynos SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han<jg1.han-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 5 +++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/dev-ohci.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/ohci.h | 21 +++++++++++
In the earlier patchset, platform_device struct for ohci was defined
within plat-samsung, and ohci.h was located in
plat-samsung/include/plat. These are still the locations where ehci
related definitions are located.
What is the reason for movement of ohci related definitions to mach folder?
--
Tushar Behera
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tushar.behera@linaro.org (Tushar Behera)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI device
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:43:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDDDCAB.1000001@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001301ccb3e0$b5fec280$21fc4780$%han@samsung.com>
On Tuesday 06 December 2011 12:01 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> This patch adds USB ohci device definition for Exynos SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han<jg1.han@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 5 +++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/dev-ohci.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/ohci.h | 21 +++++++++++
In the earlier patchset, platform_device struct for ohci was defined
within plat-samsung, and ohci.h was located in
plat-samsung/include/plat. These are still the locations where ehci
related definitions are located.
What is the reason for movement of ohci related definitions to mach folder?
--
Tushar Behera
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-06 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-06 6:30 [PATCH v2 0/3] Support Samsung Exynos OHCI device and driver Jingoo Han
2011-12-06 6:30 ` Jingoo Han
2011-12-06 6:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI device Jingoo Han
2011-12-06 6:31 ` Jingoo Han
[not found] ` <001301ccb3e0$b5fec280$21fc4780$%han-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-06 9:13 ` Tushar Behera [this message]
2011-12-06 9:13 ` Tushar Behera
[not found] ` <4EDDDCAB.1000001-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-06 9:30 ` Jingoo Han
2011-12-06 9:30 ` Jingoo Han
2011-12-06 6:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board Jingoo Han
2011-12-06 6:32 ` Jingoo Han
2011-12-06 6:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] USB: Add Samsung Exynos OHCI diver Jingoo Han
2011-12-06 6:32 ` Jingoo Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EDDDCAB.1000001@linaro.org \
--to=tushar.behera-qsej5fyqhm4dnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gregkh-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jg1.han-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kgene.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yulgon.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.