All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-lvm@redhat.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: System Storage Manager
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:56:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDF4672.9080705@draigBrady.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1112071055270.4205@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com>

On 12/07/2011 10:20 AM, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>=20
> I would like to introduce to you a new tool called System Storage
> Manager (ssm). It is supposed to provide easy to use command line
> interface to manage your storage using various technologies like
> lvm, btrfs, encrypted volumes and possibly more.
>=20
> Background
> ----------
>=20
> In more sophisticated enterprise storage environments, management wit=
h
> Device Mapper (dm), Logical Volume Manager (LVM), or Multiple Devices
> (md) is becoming increasingly more difficult. With file systems added
> to the mix, the number of tools needed to configure and manage storag=
e
> has grown so large that it is simply not user friendly. With so many
> options for a system administrator to consider, the opportunity for
> errors and problems is large.

This seems like a worthwhile project given the overlap
in functionality from the various commands.
It echoes some of the functionality provided by libguestfs
for VM images I think.

> The btrfs administration tools have shown us that storage management =
can
> be simplified, and we are working to bring that ease of use to Linux
> filesystems in general.
>=20
>=20
> You can also find some more information in my presentation from Linux=
Con
> Prague this year:
>=20
> http://people.redhat.com/lczerner/files/lczerner_fsm.pdf

This had the name 'fsm'.
I do think 'ssm' is better, however I would drop the '.py' from
the command name. This is incidental and restrictive going forward.
Note I checked the debian and freebsd man pages and 'ssm' is available.

> The code is still under development and no release has been made yet,=
 but
> I would like to share with you what I have done so far, since the
> progress has been a bit slower than I have previously expected. The
> project lives on the sf.net :
>=20
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/storagemanager/

This is a much cleaner landing page:
http://sourceforge.net/p/storagemanager/home/Home/

cheers,
P=E1draig.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] System Storage Manager
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:56:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDF4672.9080705@draigBrady.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1112071055270.4205@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com>

On 12/07/2011 10:20 AM, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> I would like to introduce to you a new tool called System Storage
> Manager (ssm). It is supposed to provide easy to use command line
> interface to manage your storage using various technologies like
> lvm, btrfs, encrypted volumes and possibly more.
> 
> Background
> ----------
> 
> In more sophisticated enterprise storage environments, management with
> Device Mapper (dm), Logical Volume Manager (LVM), or Multiple Devices
> (md) is becoming increasingly more difficult. With file systems added
> to the mix, the number of tools needed to configure and manage storage
> has grown so large that it is simply not user friendly. With so many
> options for a system administrator to consider, the opportunity for
> errors and problems is large.

This seems like a worthwhile project given the overlap
in functionality from the various commands.
It echoes some of the functionality provided by libguestfs
for VM images I think.

> The btrfs administration tools have shown us that storage management can
> be simplified, and we are working to bring that ease of use to Linux
> filesystems in general.
> 
> 
> You can also find some more information in my presentation from LinuxCon
> Prague this year:
> 
> http://people.redhat.com/lczerner/files/lczerner_fsm.pdf

This had the name 'fsm'.
I do think 'ssm' is better, however I would drop the '.py' from
the command name. This is incidental and restrictive going forward.
Note I checked the debian and freebsd man pages and 'ssm' is available.

> The code is still under development and no release has been made yet, but
> I would like to share with you what I have done so far, since the
> progress has been a bit slower than I have previously expected. The
> project lives on the sf.net :
> 
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/storagemanager/

This is a much cleaner landing page:
http://sourceforge.net/p/storagemanager/home/Home/

cheers,
P�draig.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-lvm@redhat.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: System Storage Manager
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:56:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDF4672.9080705@draigBrady.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1112071055270.4205@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com>

On 12/07/2011 10:20 AM, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> I would like to introduce to you a new tool called System Storage
> Manager (ssm). It is supposed to provide easy to use command line
> interface to manage your storage using various technologies like
> lvm, btrfs, encrypted volumes and possibly more.
> 
> Background
> ----------
> 
> In more sophisticated enterprise storage environments, management with
> Device Mapper (dm), Logical Volume Manager (LVM), or Multiple Devices
> (md) is becoming increasingly more difficult. With file systems added
> to the mix, the number of tools needed to configure and manage storage
> has grown so large that it is simply not user friendly. With so many
> options for a system administrator to consider, the opportunity for
> errors and problems is large.

This seems like a worthwhile project given the overlap
in functionality from the various commands.
It echoes some of the functionality provided by libguestfs
for VM images I think.

> The btrfs administration tools have shown us that storage management can
> be simplified, and we are working to bring that ease of use to Linux
> filesystems in general.
> 
> 
> You can also find some more information in my presentation from LinuxCon
> Prague this year:
> 
> http://people.redhat.com/lczerner/files/lczerner_fsm.pdf

This had the name 'fsm'.
I do think 'ssm' is better, however I would drop the '.py' from
the command name. This is incidental and restrictive going forward.
Note I checked the debian and freebsd man pages and 'ssm' is available.

> The code is still under development and no release has been made yet, but
> I would like to share with you what I have done so far, since the
> progress has been a bit slower than I have previously expected. The
> project lives on the sf.net :
> 
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/storagemanager/

This is a much cleaner landing page:
http://sourceforge.net/p/storagemanager/home/Home/

cheers,
Pádraig.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-07 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-07 10:20 System Storage Manager Lukas Czerner
2011-12-07 10:20 ` [linux-lvm] " Lukas Czerner
2011-12-07 10:56 ` Pádraig Brady [this message]
2011-12-07 10:56   ` Pádraig Brady
2011-12-07 10:56   ` [linux-lvm] " Pádraig Brady
2011-12-07 11:17   ` Lukas Czerner
2011-12-07 11:17     ` [linux-lvm] " Lukas Czerner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EDF4672.9080705@draigBrady.com \
    --to=p@draigbrady.com \
    --cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    --cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.