From: Donghwa Lee <dh09.lee@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] backlight/ld9040.c: regulator control in the driver
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 05:38:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE19EE5.1000608@samsung.com> (raw)
This patch supports regulator power control in the driver.
Current ld9040 driver was controlled power on/off sequence by callback function
in the board file. But, by doing this, there's no need to register lcd power
on/off callback function in the board file.
changes since v2:
- bind regulators as bulk data
- in case of failure to get regulator, free regulator bulk data
Signed-off-by: Donghwa Lee <dh09.lee@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
---
drivers/video/backlight/ld9040.c | 71
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/ld9040.c
b/drivers/video/backlight/ld9040.c
index da9a5ce..133ddff 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/ld9040.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/ld9040.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#include <linux/lcd.h>
#include <linux/backlight.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
#include "ld9040_gamma.h"
@@ -53,8 +54,51 @@ struct ld9040 {
struct lcd_device *ld;
struct backlight_device *bd;
struct lcd_platform_data *lcd_pd;
+
+ struct mutex lock;
+ bool enabled;
+};
+
+static struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[] = {
+ { .supply = "vdd3", },
+ { .supply = "vci", },
};
+static void ld9040_regulator_enable(struct ld9040 *lcd)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ struct lcd_platform_data *pd = NULL;
+
+ pd = lcd->lcd_pd;
+ mutex_lock(&lcd->lock);
+ if (!lcd->enabled) {
+ ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(supplies), supplies);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+
+ lcd->enabled = true;
+ }
+ mdelay(pd->power_on_delay);
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&lcd->lock);
+}
+
+static void ld9040_regulator_disable(struct ld9040 *lcd)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ mutex_lock(&lcd->lock);
+ if (lcd->enabled) {
+ ret = regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(supplies), supplies);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+
+ lcd->enabled = false;
+ }
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&lcd->lock);
+}
+
static const unsigned short seq_swreset[] = {
0x01, COMMAND_ONLY,
ENDDEF, 0x00
@@ -532,13 +576,8 @@ static int ld9040_power_on(struct ld9040 *lcd)
return -EFAULT;
}
- if (!pd->power_on) {
- dev_err(lcd->dev, "power_on is NULL.\n");
- return -EFAULT;
- } else {
- pd->power_on(lcd->ld, 1);
- mdelay(pd->power_on_delay);
- }
+ /* lcd power on */
+ ld9040_regulator_enable(lcd);
if (!pd->reset) {
dev_err(lcd->dev, "reset is NULL.\n");
@@ -582,11 +621,8 @@ static int ld9040_power_off(struct ld9040 *lcd)
mdelay(pd->power_off_delay);
- if (!pd->power_on) {
- dev_err(lcd->dev, "power_on is NULL.\n");
- return -EFAULT;
- } else
- pd->power_on(lcd->ld, 0);
+ /* lcd power off */
+ ld9040_regulator_disable(lcd);
return 0;
}
@@ -693,6 +729,14 @@ static int ld9040_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
goto out_free_lcd;
}
+ mutex_init(&lcd->lock);
+
+ ret = regulator_bulk_get(lcd->dev, ARRAY_SIZE(supplies), supplies);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(lcd->dev, "Failed to get regulators: %d\n", ret);
+ goto out_free_lcd;
+ }
+
ld = lcd_device_register("ld9040", &spi->dev, lcd, &ld9040_lcd_ops);
if (IS_ERR(ld)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(ld);
@@ -739,6 +783,8 @@ static int ld9040_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
out_unregister_lcd:
lcd_device_unregister(lcd->ld);
out_free_lcd:
+ regulator_bulk_free(ARRAY_SIZE(supplies), supplies);
+
kfree(lcd);
return ret;
}
@@ -750,6 +796,7 @@ static int __devexit ld9040_remove(struct spi_device
*spi)
ld9040_power(lcd, FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN);
backlight_device_unregister(lcd->bd);
lcd_device_unregister(lcd->ld);
+ regulator_bulk_free(ARRAY_SIZE(supplies), supplies);
kfree(lcd);
return 0;
--
1.7.4.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: dh09.lee@samsung.com (Donghwa Lee)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] backlight/ld9040.c: regulator control in the driver
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:38:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE19EE5.1000608@samsung.com> (raw)
This patch supports regulator power control in the driver.
Current ld9040 driver was controlled power on/off sequence by callback function
in the board file. But, by doing this, there's no need to register lcd power
on/off callback function in the board file.
changes since v2:
- bind regulators as bulk data
- in case of failure to get regulator, free regulator bulk data
Signed-off-by: Donghwa Lee <dh09.lee@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
---
drivers/video/backlight/ld9040.c | 71
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/ld9040.c
b/drivers/video/backlight/ld9040.c
index da9a5ce..133ddff 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/ld9040.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/ld9040.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#include <linux/lcd.h>
#include <linux/backlight.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
#include "ld9040_gamma.h"
@@ -53,8 +54,51 @@ struct ld9040 {
struct lcd_device *ld;
struct backlight_device *bd;
struct lcd_platform_data *lcd_pd;
+
+ struct mutex lock;
+ bool enabled;
+};
+
+static struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[] = {
+ { .supply = "vdd3", },
+ { .supply = "vci", },
};
+static void ld9040_regulator_enable(struct ld9040 *lcd)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ struct lcd_platform_data *pd = NULL;
+
+ pd = lcd->lcd_pd;
+ mutex_lock(&lcd->lock);
+ if (!lcd->enabled) {
+ ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(supplies), supplies);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+
+ lcd->enabled = true;
+ }
+ mdelay(pd->power_on_delay);
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&lcd->lock);
+}
+
+static void ld9040_regulator_disable(struct ld9040 *lcd)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ mutex_lock(&lcd->lock);
+ if (lcd->enabled) {
+ ret = regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(supplies), supplies);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+
+ lcd->enabled = false;
+ }
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&lcd->lock);
+}
+
static const unsigned short seq_swreset[] = {
0x01, COMMAND_ONLY,
ENDDEF, 0x00
@@ -532,13 +576,8 @@ static int ld9040_power_on(struct ld9040 *lcd)
return -EFAULT;
}
- if (!pd->power_on) {
- dev_err(lcd->dev, "power_on is NULL.\n");
- return -EFAULT;
- } else {
- pd->power_on(lcd->ld, 1);
- mdelay(pd->power_on_delay);
- }
+ /* lcd power on */
+ ld9040_regulator_enable(lcd);
if (!pd->reset) {
dev_err(lcd->dev, "reset is NULL.\n");
@@ -582,11 +621,8 @@ static int ld9040_power_off(struct ld9040 *lcd)
mdelay(pd->power_off_delay);
- if (!pd->power_on) {
- dev_err(lcd->dev, "power_on is NULL.\n");
- return -EFAULT;
- } else
- pd->power_on(lcd->ld, 0);
+ /* lcd power off */
+ ld9040_regulator_disable(lcd);
return 0;
}
@@ -693,6 +729,14 @@ static int ld9040_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
goto out_free_lcd;
}
+ mutex_init(&lcd->lock);
+
+ ret = regulator_bulk_get(lcd->dev, ARRAY_SIZE(supplies), supplies);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(lcd->dev, "Failed to get regulators: %d\n", ret);
+ goto out_free_lcd;
+ }
+
ld = lcd_device_register("ld9040", &spi->dev, lcd, &ld9040_lcd_ops);
if (IS_ERR(ld)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(ld);
@@ -739,6 +783,8 @@ static int ld9040_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
out_unregister_lcd:
lcd_device_unregister(lcd->ld);
out_free_lcd:
+ regulator_bulk_free(ARRAY_SIZE(supplies), supplies);
+
kfree(lcd);
return ret;
}
@@ -750,6 +796,7 @@ static int __devexit ld9040_remove(struct spi_device
*spi)
ld9040_power(lcd, FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN);
backlight_device_unregister(lcd->bd);
lcd_device_unregister(lcd->ld);
+ regulator_bulk_free(ARRAY_SIZE(supplies), supplies);
kfree(lcd);
return 0;
--
1.7.4.1
next reply other threads:[~2011-12-09 5:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-09 5:38 Donghwa Lee [this message]
2011-12-09 5:38 ` [PATCH v3] backlight/ld9040.c: regulator control in the driver Donghwa Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EE19EE5.1000608@samsung.com \
--to=dh09.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.