All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
To: "Larry Finger" <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
	"Francesco Gringoli" <francesco.gringoli@ing.unibs.it>,
	b43-dev <b43-dev@lists.infradead.org>,
	wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Performance of BCM43224 (14e4:4353)
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:16:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE1D1D3.9090505@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE15A4E.1090500@lwfinger.net>

On 12/09/2011 01:46 AM, Larry Finger wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> I just added the patches that let brcmsmac use bcma, and tested the TX and RX 
> rates using netperf. The results are
> 
> Driver			RX		TX
> 
> brcmsmac		21.7		6.2
> b43			15.0		6.0
> wl			43.5		73.5
> 
> The AP is running in 802.11n mode and has throughput of 40-60 Mbps in both 
> directions with an RTL8192CE, thus both open-source drivers have room for 
> improvement.
> 
> I am using the following firmware:
> b43-phy0: Loading firmware version 666.2 (2011-02-23 01:15:07)
> 
> 
> With b43 and mac80211 debugging turned on, I see a lot of
> 
> wlan13: detected beacon loss from AP - sending probe request
> 
> Larry
> 

Hi Larry

Thanks for trying. I used iperf for my throughput testing. It has two
biderectional flavours: simultaneous (-d) and individual (-r):
-d: 39 Mbps
-r: 65 Mbps

There are some more bcma related patches to be sent out, but I don't
expect that it will change your benchmark results (as mine were similar
if not identical at each commit).

Gr. AvS


  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-09  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-09  0:46 Performance of BCM43224 (14e4:4353) Larry Finger
2011-12-09  9:16 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2011-12-09 10:27 ` Arend van Spriel
2011-12-09 16:44   ` Larry Finger
2011-12-09 16:44     ` Larry Finger
2011-12-09 17:32     ` Arend van Spriel
2011-12-09 17:57       ` Larry Finger
2011-12-09 17:57         ` Larry Finger
2011-12-09 19:31         ` Arend van Spriel
2011-12-09 20:06           ` Larry Finger
2011-12-09 20:06             ` Larry Finger
2011-12-09 18:17       ` Larry Finger
2011-12-09 18:17         ` Larry Finger
2011-12-09 20:04         ` Arend van Spriel
2011-12-09 22:53           ` Larry Finger
2011-12-09 22:53             ` Larry Finger
2011-12-10  9:18             ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-12-10  9:18               ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-12-10 11:04               ` Arend van Spriel
2011-12-10 19:49                 ` Larry Finger
2011-12-10 19:49                   ` Larry Finger
2011-12-10 20:28                   ` Arend van Spriel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EE1D1D3.9090505@broadcom.com \
    --to=arend@broadcom.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=francesco.gringoli@ing.unibs.it \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.