From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: tony@atomide.com, rob.herring@calxeda.com
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] OMAP4: Add DT support for i2c and twl6030
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 15:01:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE214BC.7000405@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323438631-28124-1-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com>
Mmm, the send-email was aborted because Manju's email is not valid anymore.
I'll repost after removing the email from the patches.
Sorry for the noise.
Regards,
Benoit
On 12/9/2011 2:50 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> Hi Tony and Rob,
>
> Here is the updated version of the i2c + twl DT adaptation.
>
> This update, compared to v1 [1], is mainly due to the merge into 3.2 of
> Andy's i2c cleanup series that was introducing a lot of pdata accesses
> at runtime.
>
> The pm.c was updated to prevent the SR / VP initialization in the DT
> context since none of them is DT aware for the moment.
>
> A couple of basic i2c devices are added for panda, beagle and sdp board.
>
> Patches are based on for_3.3/2_dt_irq, to get the latest GIC binding,
> and are available here:
> git://gitorious.org/omap-pm/linux.git for_3.3/3_omap_dt_i2c_twl
>
> Tested on Beagle and sdp4430.
>
> Comments are welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Benoit
>
> [1] http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2011-September/007821.html
>
>
> Benoit Cousson (10):
> ARM: OMAP2+: pm: Do not init statically the SR and voltage layer with DT
> i2c: OMAP: Add DT support for i2c controller
> mfd: twl-core: Add initial DT support for twl4030/twl6030
> rtc: rtc-twl: Add DT support for RTC inside twl4030/twl6030
> arm/dts: OMAP4: Add i2c controller nodes
> arm/dts: OMAP3: Add i2c controller nodes
> arm/dts: omap4-panda: Add twl6030 and i2c EEPROM
> arm/dts: omap4-sdp: Add twl6030, i2c3 and i2c4 devices
> arm/dts: omap3-beagle: Add twl4030 and i2c EEPROM
> ARM: OMAP2+: board-generic: Remove i2c static init
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/omap-i2c.txt | 42 ++++++++
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/twl-familly.txt | 47 +++++++++
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/twl-rtc.txt | 12 +++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts | 38 ++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi | 28 ++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda.dts | 45 +++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-sdp.dts | 63 ++++++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi | 28 ++++++
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c | 48 +---------
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c | 8 ++
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 100 +++++++++++++-------
> drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 53 ++++++++++-
> drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c | 10 ++-
> 13 files changed, 435 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/omap-i2c.txt
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/twl-familly.txt
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/twl-rtc.txt
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/10] OMAP4: Add DT support for i2c and twl6030
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 15:01:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE214BC.7000405@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323438631-28124-1-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com>
Mmm, the send-email was aborted because Manju's email is not valid anymore.
I'll repost after removing the email from the patches.
Sorry for the noise.
Regards,
Benoit
On 12/9/2011 2:50 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> Hi Tony and Rob,
>
> Here is the updated version of the i2c + twl DT adaptation.
>
> This update, compared to v1 [1], is mainly due to the merge into 3.2 of
> Andy's i2c cleanup series that was introducing a lot of pdata accesses
> at runtime.
>
> The pm.c was updated to prevent the SR / VP initialization in the DT
> context since none of them is DT aware for the moment.
>
> A couple of basic i2c devices are added for panda, beagle and sdp board.
>
> Patches are based on for_3.3/2_dt_irq, to get the latest GIC binding,
> and are available here:
> git://gitorious.org/omap-pm/linux.git for_3.3/3_omap_dt_i2c_twl
>
> Tested on Beagle and sdp4430.
>
> Comments are welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Benoit
>
> [1] http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2011-September/007821.html
>
>
> Benoit Cousson (10):
> ARM: OMAP2+: pm: Do not init statically the SR and voltage layer with DT
> i2c: OMAP: Add DT support for i2c controller
> mfd: twl-core: Add initial DT support for twl4030/twl6030
> rtc: rtc-twl: Add DT support for RTC inside twl4030/twl6030
> arm/dts: OMAP4: Add i2c controller nodes
> arm/dts: OMAP3: Add i2c controller nodes
> arm/dts: omap4-panda: Add twl6030 and i2c EEPROM
> arm/dts: omap4-sdp: Add twl6030, i2c3 and i2c4 devices
> arm/dts: omap3-beagle: Add twl4030 and i2c EEPROM
> ARM: OMAP2+: board-generic: Remove i2c static init
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/omap-i2c.txt | 42 ++++++++
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/twl-familly.txt | 47 +++++++++
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/twl-rtc.txt | 12 +++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts | 38 ++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi | 28 ++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-panda.dts | 45 +++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-sdp.dts | 63 ++++++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi | 28 ++++++
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c | 48 +---------
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c | 8 ++
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 100 +++++++++++++-------
> drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 53 ++++++++++-
> drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c | 10 ++-
> 13 files changed, 435 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/omap-i2c.txt
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/twl-familly.txt
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/twl-rtc.txt
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-09 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-09 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/10] OMAP4: Add DT support for i2c and twl6030 Benoit Cousson
2011-12-09 13:50 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-12-09 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] ARM: OMAP2+: pm: Do not init statically the SR and voltage layer with DT Benoit Cousson
2011-12-09 13:50 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-12-10 1:32 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-12-10 1:32 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-12-09 14:01 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2011-12-09 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] OMAP4: Add DT support for i2c and twl6030 Cousson, Benoit
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-09 14:02 Benoit Cousson
2011-12-09 14:02 ` Benoit Cousson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EE214BC.7000405@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.