From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: tony@atomide.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: OMAP2/3: intc: Add DT support for TI interrupt controller
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 17:58:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE23E32.2060503@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE2335C.7050902@gmail.com>
On 12/9/2011 5:12 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 10:06 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
[...]
>> Mmm, I'm probably missing something here.
>>
>> My point is that even in the DT case I do have some devices that are
>> initialized without DT for the moment and thus cannot get access to the
>> interrupt-controller node and then cannot retrieve the domain information.
>>
>> How can I ensure the proper hwirq -> irq translation then for such devices?
>> Only the one created by DT will have the correct irq number.
>
> Okay, I missed that aspect of it. So I guess 0 base is fine for now.
Cool, thanks.
I'll repost early next week to take into account your other comments.
Thanks,
Benoit
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: OMAP2/3: intc: Add DT support for TI interrupt controller
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 17:58:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE23E32.2060503@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE2335C.7050902@gmail.com>
On 12/9/2011 5:12 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 10:06 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
[...]
>> Mmm, I'm probably missing something here.
>>
>> My point is that even in the DT case I do have some devices that are
>> initialized without DT for the moment and thus cannot get access to the
>> interrupt-controller node and then cannot retrieve the domain information.
>>
>> How can I ensure the proper hwirq -> irq translation then for such devices?
>> Only the one created by DT will have the correct irq number.
>
> Okay, I missed that aspect of it. So I guess 0 base is fine for now.
Cool, thanks.
I'll repost early next week to take into account your other comments.
Thanks,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-09 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-07 20:50 [PATCH 0/4] ARM: OMAP2+: Interrupt controllers adaptation to DT Benoit Cousson
2011-12-07 20:50 ` Benoit Cousson
[not found] ` <1323291049-24964-1-git-send-email-b-cousson-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-07 20:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm/dts: OMAP4: Update DTS file with new GIC bindings Benoit Cousson
2011-12-07 20:50 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-12-07 20:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: OMAP2/3: intc: Add DT support for TI interrupt controller Benoit Cousson
2011-12-07 20:50 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-12-07 21:20 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-07 21:20 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-08 14:59 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-12-08 14:59 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-12-09 13:20 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-09 13:20 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-09 14:52 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-12-09 14:52 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-12-09 15:22 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-09 15:22 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-09 16:06 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-12-09 16:06 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-12-09 16:12 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-09 16:12 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-09 16:58 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2011-12-09 16:58 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-12-15 17:49 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-12-15 17:49 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-12-15 20:52 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-15 20:52 ` Rob Herring
2011-12-13 9:15 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-13 9:15 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-07 20:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm/dts: OMAP3: Add interrupt-controller bindings for INTC Benoit Cousson
2011-12-07 20:50 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-12-07 20:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: OMAP2+: board-generic: Use of_irq_init API Benoit Cousson
2011-12-07 20:50 ` Benoit Cousson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EE23E32.2060503@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.