* We are seeing more and more programs accessing sysfs_t.
@ 2011-12-13 20:37 Daniel J Walsh
2011-12-13 20:44 ` Stephen Smalley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel J Walsh @ 2011-12-13 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: SELinux
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Every domain is now reading /sys/devices/system/cpu/online because of
changes to glibc.
We are also seeing domains that need write access.
For example
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=685096
>
> for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=685096 (IP over
> Infiniband support for NetworkManager), NM needs to be able to
> write to /sys/class/net/ib*/mode. audit2allow says:
>
> allow NetworkManager_t sysfs_t:file write;
It seems we need a better way of labeling files under /sys.
genfscon only seems to work at the top level.
Allowing all domains to read sysfs_t does not seem like the correct
solution, and allow NetworkManager to write anywhere on /sys is
probably not good either.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk7nt5oACgkQrlYvE4MpobOyfwCfav6hMLyB5kPcAJvW81zhqC7o
s30AoJv2aI8RmLi8gDq2gGMjadiyLziP
=PVUp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: We are seeing more and more programs accessing sysfs_t.
2011-12-13 20:37 We are seeing more and more programs accessing sysfs_t Daniel J Walsh
@ 2011-12-13 20:44 ` Stephen Smalley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Smalley @ 2011-12-13 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel J Walsh; +Cc: SELinux
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 15:37 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Every domain is now reading /sys/devices/system/cpu/online because of
> changes to glibc.
>
> We are also seeing domains that need write access.
>
> For example
>
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=685096
> >
> > for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=685096 (IP over
> > Infiniband support for NetworkManager), NM needs to be able to
> > write to /sys/class/net/ib*/mode. audit2allow says:
> >
> > allow NetworkManager_t sysfs_t:file write;
>
> It seems we need a better way of labeling files under /sys.
>
> genfscon only seems to work at the top level.
>
> Allowing all domains to read sysfs_t does not seem like the correct
> solution, and allow NetworkManager to write anywhere on /sys is
> probably not good either.
Modern kernels support setfilecon()/setxattr() on sysfs nodes, so a
userspace program can set specific types on them. That was added a
couple of years ago for libvirt. Just specify the desired labels in
file_contexts and restorecon -R /sys at boot.
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-12-13 20:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-13 20:37 We are seeing more and more programs accessing sysfs_t Daniel J Walsh
2011-12-13 20:44 ` Stephen Smalley
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.