From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Neil <neil.jones@imgtec.com>
Subject: bugs in "ASoC: core - Optimise and refactor pcm_new() to pass only rtd"?
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:43:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE89A06.80101@imgtec.com> (raw)
Hi,
I've bisected a problem with an out of tree set of asoc drivers down to commit
552d1ef6b5a98d7b95959d5b139071e3c90cebf1 ("ASoC: core - Optimise and refactor
pcm_new() to pass only rtd"). By the looks of it this change was intended not
to change the workings of the code, however the dai parameter of pcm_new used
to be passed codec_dai in soc_new_pcm() (initialised from rtd->codec_dai), but
each driver now sets it's dai to rtd->cpu_dai instead. This seems to make the
driver check the wrong dai's driver->capture.channels_min in the pcm_new
callback, which makes it dereference
pcm->streams[SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE].substream in the driver's
preallocate_dma_buffer() function which can be NULL. Is this a bug (in every
pcm asoc driver) that just happens not to have been noticed, or have I
misunderstood it?
Relevant snippets of the original patch below.
Thanks
James
diff --git a/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c b/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c
index 5cb3b88..9465588 100644
--- a/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c
+++ b/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c
@@ -425,9 +425,11 @@ static void dma_free_dma_buffers(struct snd_pcm *pcm)
static u64 dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
-static int dma_new(struct snd_card *card,
- struct snd_soc_dai *dai, struct snd_pcm *pcm)
+static int dma_new(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
{
+ struct snd_card *card = rtd->card->snd_card;
+ struct snd_soc_dai *dai = rtd->cpu_dai;
+ struct snd_pcm *pcm = rtd->pcm;
int ret = 0;
pr_debug("Entered %s\n", __func__);
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index c53f5d5..29bf9fb 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
@@ -2143,8 +2143,7 @@ static int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num)
snd_pcm_set_ops(pcm, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE, &soc_pcm_ops);
if (platform->driver->pcm_new) {
- ret = platform->driver->pcm_new(rtd->card->snd_card,
- codec_dai, pcm);
+ ret = platform->driver->pcm_new(rtd);
if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("asoc: platform pcm constructor failed\n");
return ret;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
<alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Neil <neil.jones@imgtec.com>
Subject: bugs in "ASoC: core - Optimise and refactor pcm_new() to pass only rtd"?
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:43:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE89A06.80101@imgtec.com> (raw)
Hi,
I've bisected a problem with an out of tree set of asoc drivers down to commit
552d1ef6b5a98d7b95959d5b139071e3c90cebf1 ("ASoC: core - Optimise and refactor
pcm_new() to pass only rtd"). By the looks of it this change was intended not
to change the workings of the code, however the dai parameter of pcm_new used
to be passed codec_dai in soc_new_pcm() (initialised from rtd->codec_dai), but
each driver now sets it's dai to rtd->cpu_dai instead. This seems to make the
driver check the wrong dai's driver->capture.channels_min in the pcm_new
callback, which makes it dereference
pcm->streams[SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE].substream in the driver's
preallocate_dma_buffer() function which can be NULL. Is this a bug (in every
pcm asoc driver) that just happens not to have been noticed, or have I
misunderstood it?
Relevant snippets of the original patch below.
Thanks
James
diff --git a/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c b/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c
index 5cb3b88..9465588 100644
--- a/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c
+++ b/sound/soc/samsung/dma.c
@@ -425,9 +425,11 @@ static void dma_free_dma_buffers(struct snd_pcm *pcm)
static u64 dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
-static int dma_new(struct snd_card *card,
- struct snd_soc_dai *dai, struct snd_pcm *pcm)
+static int dma_new(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
{
+ struct snd_card *card = rtd->card->snd_card;
+ struct snd_soc_dai *dai = rtd->cpu_dai;
+ struct snd_pcm *pcm = rtd->pcm;
int ret = 0;
pr_debug("Entered %s\n", __func__);
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index c53f5d5..29bf9fb 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
@@ -2143,8 +2143,7 @@ static int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num)
snd_pcm_set_ops(pcm, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE, &soc_pcm_ops);
if (platform->driver->pcm_new) {
- ret = platform->driver->pcm_new(rtd->card->snd_card,
- codec_dai, pcm);
+ ret = platform->driver->pcm_new(rtd);
if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("asoc: platform pcm constructor failed\n");
return ret;
next reply other threads:[~2011-12-14 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-14 12:43 James Hogan [this message]
2011-12-14 12:43 ` bugs in "ASoC: core - Optimise and refactor pcm_new() to pass only rtd"? James Hogan
2011-12-14 13:34 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-14 13:58 ` James Hogan
2011-12-14 13:58 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EE89A06.80101@imgtec.com \
--to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=neil.jones@imgtec.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.