* [PATCH] NFSD: forget_delegations should use list_for_each_entry_safe
@ 2011-12-14 19:39 bjschuma
2011-12-14 20:50 ` Casey Bodley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: bjschuma @ 2011-12-14 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bfields; +Cc: linux-nfs, cbodley, Bryan Schumaker
From: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
Otherwise the for loop could try to use a file recently removed from the
file_hashtbl list and oops.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 9 +++++----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 19ca9b5..7355fe4 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -4505,18 +4505,19 @@ void nfsd_forget_openowners(u64 num)
int nfsd_process_n_delegations(u64 num, void (*deleg_func)(struct nfs4_delegation *))
{
int i, count = 0;
- struct nfs4_file *fp;
- struct nfs4_delegation *dp, *next;
+ struct nfs4_file *fp, *fnext;
+ struct nfs4_delegation *dp, *dnext;
for (i = 0; i < FILE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
- list_for_each_entry(fp, &file_hashtbl[i], fi_hash) {
- list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, next, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(fp, fnext, &file_hashtbl[i], fi_hash) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, dnext, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) {
deleg_func(dp);
if (++count == num)
return count;
}
}
}
+
return count;
}
--
1.7.8
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] NFSD: forget_delegations should use list_for_each_entry_safe
2011-12-14 19:39 [PATCH] NFSD: forget_delegations should use list_for_each_entry_safe bjschuma
@ 2011-12-14 20:50 ` Casey Bodley
2011-12-14 21:11 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-12-14 22:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Casey Bodley @ 2011-12-14 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bjschuma; +Cc: bfields, linux-nfs
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:39 PM, <bjschuma@netapp.com> wrote:
> From: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
>
> Otherwise the for loop could try to use a file recently removed from the
> file_hashtbl list and oops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 19ca9b5..7355fe4 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -4505,18 +4505,19 @@ void nfsd_forget_openowners(u64 num)
> int nfsd_process_n_delegations(u64 num, void (*deleg_func)(struct nfs4_delegation *))
> {
> int i, count = 0;
> - struct nfs4_file *fp;
> - struct nfs4_delegation *dp, *next;
> + struct nfs4_file *fp, *fnext;
> + struct nfs4_delegation *dp, *dnext;
>
> for (i = 0; i < FILE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
> - list_for_each_entry(fp, &file_hashtbl[i], fi_hash) {
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, next, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) {
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(fp, fnext, &file_hashtbl[i], fi_hash) {
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, dnext, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) {
> deleg_func(dp);
> if (++count == num)
> return count;
> }
> }
> }
> +
> return count;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.8
>
Confirmed to fix the oops I was getting with fault injection. (tested
without the previous patch, NFSD: Only reinitilize the recall_lru list
under the recall lock)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] NFSD: forget_delegations should use list_for_each_entry_safe
2011-12-14 20:50 ` Casey Bodley
@ 2011-12-14 21:11 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-12-14 22:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bryan Schumaker @ 2011-12-14 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Casey Bodley; +Cc: bfields, linux-nfs
On Wed Dec 14 15:50:53 2011, Casey Bodley wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:39 PM, <bjschuma@netapp.com> wrote:
>> From: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
>>
>> Otherwise the for loop could try to use a file recently removed from the
>> file_hashtbl list and oops.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
>> ---
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 9 +++++----
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> index 19ca9b5..7355fe4 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> @@ -4505,18 +4505,19 @@ void nfsd_forget_openowners(u64 num)
>> int nfsd_process_n_delegations(u64 num, void (*deleg_func)(struct nfs4_delegation *))
>> {
>> int i, count = 0;
>> - struct nfs4_file *fp;
>> - struct nfs4_delegation *dp, *next;
>> + struct nfs4_file *fp, *fnext;
>> + struct nfs4_delegation *dp, *dnext;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < FILE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
>> - list_for_each_entry(fp, &file_hashtbl[i], fi_hash) {
>> - list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, next, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) {
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(fp, fnext, &file_hashtbl[i], fi_hash) {
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, dnext, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) {
>> deleg_func(dp);
>> if (++count == num)
>> return count;
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> +
>> return count;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.8
>>
>
> Confirmed to fix the oops I was getting with fault injection. (tested
> without the previous patch, NFSD: Only reinitilize the recall_lru list
> under the recall lock)
Thanks for testing!
- Bryan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] NFSD: forget_delegations should use list_for_each_entry_safe
2011-12-14 20:50 ` Casey Bodley
2011-12-14 21:11 ` Bryan Schumaker
@ 2011-12-14 22:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2011-12-14 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Casey Bodley; +Cc: bjschuma, linux-nfs
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 03:50:53PM -0500, Casey Bodley wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:39 PM, <bjschuma@netapp.com> wrote:
> > From: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
> >
> > Otherwise the for loop could try to use a file recently removed from the
> > file_hashtbl list and oops.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 9 +++++----
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > index 19ca9b5..7355fe4 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -4505,18 +4505,19 @@ void nfsd_forget_openowners(u64 num)
> > int nfsd_process_n_delegations(u64 num, void (*deleg_func)(struct nfs4_delegation *))
> > {
> > int i, count = 0;
> > - struct nfs4_file *fp;
> > - struct nfs4_delegation *dp, *next;
> > + struct nfs4_file *fp, *fnext;
> > + struct nfs4_delegation *dp, *dnext;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < FILE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
> > - list_for_each_entry(fp, &file_hashtbl[i], fi_hash) {
> > - list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, next, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) {
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(fp, fnext, &file_hashtbl[i], fi_hash) {
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, dnext, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) {
> > deleg_func(dp);
> > if (++count == num)
> > return count;
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > return count;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.8
> >
>
> Confirmed to fix the oops I was getting with fault injection. (tested
> without the previous patch, NFSD: Only reinitilize the recall_lru list
> under the recall lock)
Ah-hah. Thanks Bryan, and Casey--committed.
--b.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-12-14 22:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-14 19:39 [PATCH] NFSD: forget_delegations should use list_for_each_entry_safe bjschuma
2011-12-14 20:50 ` Casey Bodley
2011-12-14 21:11 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-12-14 22:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.