All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	paul@paulmenage.org, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	gthelen@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	kirill@shutemov.name, avagin@parallels.com, devel@openvz.org,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] Request for inclusion: per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:48:26 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE9983A.3060101@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111215.004836.402973956281143052.davem@davemloft.net>

On 12/15/2011 09:48 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:40:19 +0900
>
>> I met this bug at _1st_ run. Please enable _all_ debug options!.
>
> Plus the CONFIG_NET=n and other build failures.
>
> This patch series was seriously rushed, and very poorly handled.
>
> Yet I kept getting so much pressure to review, comment upon, and
> ultimately apply these patches.  Never, ever, do this to me ever
> again.
>
> If I don't feel your patches are high priority enough or ready enough
> for me to review, then TOO BAD.  Don't ask people to pressure me or
> get my attention.  Instead, ask others for help and do testing before
> wasting MY time and crapping up MY tree.
>
> I should have noticed a red flag when I have James Bottomly asking me
> to look at these patches, I should have pushed back.  Instead, I
> relented, and now I'm very seriously regretting it.
>
> All the regressions in the net-next tree over the past several days
> have been due to this patch set, and this patch set alone.
>
> This code wasn't ready and needed, at a minimum, several more weeks of
> work before being put in.
>
> Instead, we're going to bandaid patch it up after the fact, rather
> than just letting these changes mature naturally during the review
> process.
Hi Dave,

You are right about all points. I will admit to it, face it, and 
apologize it.
I guess the best I can do right now is fix whatever you guys point me to 
and not repeat it in the future.

Thanks

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<paul@paulmenage.org>, <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	<ebiederm@xmission.com>, <gthelen@google.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<kirill@shutemov.name>, <avagin@parallels.com>,
	<devel@openvz.org>, <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] Request for inclusion: per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:48:26 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE9983A.3060101@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111215.004836.402973956281143052.davem@davemloft.net>

On 12/15/2011 09:48 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:40:19 +0900
>
>> I met this bug at _1st_ run. Please enable _all_ debug options!.
>
> Plus the CONFIG_NET=n and other build failures.
>
> This patch series was seriously rushed, and very poorly handled.
>
> Yet I kept getting so much pressure to review, comment upon, and
> ultimately apply these patches.  Never, ever, do this to me ever
> again.
>
> If I don't feel your patches are high priority enough or ready enough
> for me to review, then TOO BAD.  Don't ask people to pressure me or
> get my attention.  Instead, ask others for help and do testing before
> wasting MY time and crapping up MY tree.
>
> I should have noticed a red flag when I have James Bottomly asking me
> to look at these patches, I should have pushed back.  Instead, I
> relented, and now I'm very seriously regretting it.
>
> All the regressions in the net-next tree over the past several days
> have been due to this patch set, and this patch set alone.
>
> This code wasn't ready and needed, at a minimum, several more weeks of
> work before being put in.
>
> Instead, we're going to bandaid patch it up after the fact, rather
> than just letting these changes mature naturally during the review
> process.
Hi Dave,

You are right about all points. I will admit to it, face it, and 
apologize it.
I guess the best I can do right now is fix whatever you guys point me to 
and not repeat it in the future.

Thanks

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<paul@paulmenage.org>, <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	<ebiederm@xmission.com>, <gthelen@google.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<kirill@shutemov.name>, <avagin@parallels.com>,
	<devel@openvz.org>, <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] Request for inclusion: per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:48:26 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE9983A.3060101@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111215.004836.402973956281143052.davem@davemloft.net>

On 12/15/2011 09:48 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:40:19 +0900
>
>> I met this bug at _1st_ run. Please enable _all_ debug options!.
>
> Plus the CONFIG_NET=n and other build failures.
>
> This patch series was seriously rushed, and very poorly handled.
>
> Yet I kept getting so much pressure to review, comment upon, and
> ultimately apply these patches.  Never, ever, do this to me ever
> again.
>
> If I don't feel your patches are high priority enough or ready enough
> for me to review, then TOO BAD.  Don't ask people to pressure me or
> get my attention.  Instead, ask others for help and do testing before
> wasting MY time and crapping up MY tree.
>
> I should have noticed a red flag when I have James Bottomly asking me
> to look at these patches, I should have pushed back.  Instead, I
> relented, and now I'm very seriously regretting it.
>
> All the regressions in the net-next tree over the past several days
> have been due to this patch set, and this patch set alone.
>
> This code wasn't ready and needed, at a minimum, several more weeks of
> work before being put in.
>
> Instead, we're going to bandaid patch it up after the fact, rather
> than just letting these changes mature naturally during the review
> process.
Hi Dave,

You are right about all points. I will admit to it, face it, and 
apologize it.
I guess the best I can do right now is fix whatever you guys point me to 
and not repeat it in the future.

Thanks

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-15  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-12  7:47 [PATCH v9 0/9] Request for inclusion: per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47 ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47 ` [PATCH v9 1/9] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47   ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-14 17:04   ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-14 17:04     ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]     ` <20111214170447.GB4856-VqjxzfR4DlwKmadIfiO5sKVXKuFTiq87@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-15 12:29       ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-15 12:29         ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-15 12:29         ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-15 12:29         ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-16 12:32         ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-16 12:32           ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-16 13:02           ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-16 13:02             ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-16 13:02             ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]             ` <4EEB417B.8000508-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-16 13:30               ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-16 13:30                 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-16 13:30                 ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]   ` <1323676029-5890-2-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-16  6:20     ` Greg Thelen
2011-12-16  6:20       ` Greg Thelen
2011-12-16  6:20       ` Greg Thelen
2011-12-12  7:47 ` [PATCH v9 2/9] foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure controlling Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47   ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47 ` [PATCH v9 3/9] socket: initial cgroup code Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47   ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-22 21:10   ` Jason Baron
2011-12-22 21:10     ` Jason Baron
2011-12-23  8:57     ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-23  8:57       ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-23  8:57       ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47 ` [PATCH v9 4/9] tcp memory pressure controls Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47   ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47 ` [PATCH v9 5/9] per-netns ipv4 sysctl_tcp_mem Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47   ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47 ` [PATCH v9 6/9] tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47   ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47 ` [PATCH v9 7/9] Display current tcp memory allocation in kmem cgroup Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47   ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47 ` [PATCH v9 8/9] Display current tcp failcnt " Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47   ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47 ` [PATCH v9 9/9] Display maximum tcp memory allocation " Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  7:47   ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-13  0:07 ` [PATCH v9 0/9] Request for inclusion: per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls David Miller
2011-12-13  0:07   ` David Miller
2011-12-13 13:49   ` Christoph Paasch
2011-12-13 13:49     ` Christoph Paasch
2011-12-13 13:49     ` Christoph Paasch
2011-12-13 13:59     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-13 13:59       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-13 13:59       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-13 18:45       ` David Miller
2011-12-13 18:45         ` David Miller
2011-12-13 20:11       ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-13 20:11         ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-13 20:11         ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-15  5:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-15  5:40   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-15  5:40   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-15  5:48   ` David Miller
2011-12-15  5:48     ` David Miller
2011-12-15  6:48     ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2011-12-15  6:48       ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-15  6:48       ` Glauber Costa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EE9983A.3060101@parallels.com \
    --to=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=avagin@parallels.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.