All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: b-cousson@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com,
	khilman@ti.com, govindraj.raja@ti.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, robherring2@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: Add a new state to handle hwmods left enabled at init
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:33:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEB256C.6030306@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1112160334100.12660@utopia.booyaka.com>

Hi Paul,

On Friday 16 December 2011 04:07 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>> >  An hwmod with a 'HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE' flag set, is left in
>> >  enabled state by the hwmod framework post the initial setup.
>> >  Once a real user of the device (a driver) tries to enable it
>> >  at a later point, the hwmod framework throws a WARN() about
>> >  the device being already in enabled state.
>> >
>> >  Fix this by introducing a new state '_HWMOD_STATE_ENABLED_AT_INIT'
>> >  to identify such devices/hwmods. When the device/hwmod
>> >  is requested to be enabled (the first time) by its driver/user,
>> >  nothing except the mux-enable and a state change to '_HWMOD_STATE_ENABLED'
>> >  is needed. The mux data is board specific and is unavailable during
>> >  initial enable() of the device, done by the framework as part of
>> >  setup().
>> >
>> >  A good example of a such a device is an UART used as debug console.
>> >  The UART module needs to be kept enabled through the boot, until the
>> >  UART driver takes control of it, for debug prints to appear on
>> >  the console.
>> >
>> >  Acked-by: Kevin Hilman<khilman@ti.com>
>> >  Acked-by: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
>> >  Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com>
> I've tweaked this patch a little bit, mostly to avoid adding a new state,
> which increases the complexity of the rest of the code that handles the
> hwmod state machine.  The modified patch below just uses an internal flag.
> Please let me know if you have any comments.

Looks good to me.

thanks,
Rajendra


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: Add a new state to handle hwmods left enabled at init
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:33:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEB256C.6030306@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1112160334100.12660@utopia.booyaka.com>

Hi Paul,

On Friday 16 December 2011 04:07 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>> >  An hwmod with a 'HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE' flag set, is left in
>> >  enabled state by the hwmod framework post the initial setup.
>> >  Once a real user of the device (a driver) tries to enable it
>> >  at a later point, the hwmod framework throws a WARN() about
>> >  the device being already in enabled state.
>> >
>> >  Fix this by introducing a new state '_HWMOD_STATE_ENABLED_AT_INIT'
>> >  to identify such devices/hwmods. When the device/hwmod
>> >  is requested to be enabled (the first time) by its driver/user,
>> >  nothing except the mux-enable and a state change to '_HWMOD_STATE_ENABLED'
>> >  is needed. The mux data is board specific and is unavailable during
>> >  initial enable() of the device, done by the framework as part of
>> >  setup().
>> >
>> >  A good example of a such a device is an UART used as debug console.
>> >  The UART module needs to be kept enabled through the boot, until the
>> >  UART driver takes control of it, for debug prints to appear on
>> >  the console.
>> >
>> >  Acked-by: Kevin Hilman<khilman@ti.com>
>> >  Acked-by: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
>> >  Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com>
> I've tweaked this patch a little bit, mostly to avoid adding a new state,
> which increases the complexity of the rest of the code that handles the
> hwmod state machine.  The modified patch below just uses an internal flag.
> Please let me know if you have any comments.

Looks good to me.

thanks,
Rajendra

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-16 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-21 12:12 [PATCH v3] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: Add a new state to handle hwmods left enabled at init Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-21 12:12 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-21 18:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-11-21 18:38   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-12-16 10:37 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 10:37   ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 11:03   ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2011-12-16 11:03     ` Rajendra Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EEB256C.6030306@ti.com \
    --to=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=govindraj.raja@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.