* rfcomm & encryption
@ 2012-01-03 20:20 Daniel Wagner
2012-01-03 20:34 ` Marcel Holtmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Wagner @ 2012-01-03 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-bluetooth
Hi,
I am trying to get DUN working with SSP. If SSP is disabled everything
is fine. As soon SSP is enabled the fun starts. As it turns out we
try to connect without encryption enabled and the other side blocks it:
HCI sniffer - Bluetooth packet analyzer ver 2.2
device: hci0 snap_len: 1028 filter: 0xffffffffffffffff
< HCI Command: Create Connection (0x01|0x0005) plen 13
bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05 ptype 0xcc18 rswitch 0x01 clkoffset 0x0000
Packet type: DM1 DM3 DM5 DH1 DH3 DH5 > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
Create Connection (0x01|0x0005) status 0x00 ncmd 1
> HCI Event: Connect Complete (0x03) plen 11
status 0x00 handle 42 bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05 type ACL encrypt 0x00
< HCI Command: Read Remote Supported Features (0x01|0x001b) plen 2
handle 42
> HCI Event: Page Scan Repetition Mode Change (0x20) plen 7
bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05 mode 1
> HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3
handle 42 slots 5
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
Read Remote Supported Features (0x01|0x001b) status 0x00 ncmd 1
> HCI Event: Read Remote Supported Features (0x0b) plen 11
status 0x00 handle 42
Features: 0xbf 0xee 0x0f 0xce 0x98 0xbd 0x59 0x83
< HCI Command: Read Remote Extended Features (0x01|0x001c) plen 3
handle 42 page 1
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
Read Remote Extended Features (0x01|0x001c) status 0x00 ncmd 1
> HCI Event: Read Remote Extended Features (0x23) plen 13
status 0x00 handle 42 page 1 max 1
Features: 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
< HCI Command: Remote Name Request (0x01|0x0019) plen 10
bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05 mode 2 clkoffset 0x0000
< ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x00 dlen 10
L2CAP(s): Info req: type 2
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
handle 42 packets 1
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
Remote Name Request (0x01|0x0019) status 0x00 ncmd 1
> ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 16
L2CAP(s): Info rsp: type 2 result 0
Extended feature mask 0x0000
< ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x00 dlen 12
L2CAP(s): Connect req: psm 1 scid 0x0040
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
handle 42 packets 1
> ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 16
L2CAP(s): Connect rsp: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0040 result 0 status 0
Connection successful
< ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x00 dlen 12
L2CAP(s): Config req: dcid 0x0040 flags 0x00 clen 0
> ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 16
L2CAP(s): Config req: dcid 0x0040 flags 0x00 clen 4
MTU 65535 < ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x00 dlen 18
L2CAP(s): Config rsp: scid 0x0040 flags 0x00 result 0 clen 4
MTU 65535 > ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 14
L2CAP(s): Config rsp: scid 0x0040 flags 0x00 result 0 clen 0
Success
< ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x00 dlen 24
L2CAP(d): cid 0x0040 len 20 [psm 1]
SDP SSA Req: tid 0x0 len 0xf
pat uuid-16 0x1103 (DUN)
max 65535
aid(s) 0x0000 - 0xffff
cont 00
> ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 112
L2CAP(d): cid 0x0040 len 108 [psm 1]
SDP SSA Rsp: tid 0x0 len 0x67
count 100
record #0
aid 0x0000 (SrvRecHndl)
uint 0x10003
aid 0x0001 (SrvClassIDList)
< uuid-16 0x1103 (DUN) uuid-16 0x1201 (Networking) >
aid 0x0004 (ProtocolDescList)
< < uuid-16 0x0100 (L2CAP) > <
uuid-16 0x0003 (RFCOMM) uint 0x1 > >
aid 0x0005 (BrwGrpList)
< uuid-16 0x1002 (PubBrwsGrp) >
aid 0x0006 (LangBaseAttrIDList)
< uint 0x656e uint 0x6a uint 0x100 >
aid 0x0009 (BTProfileDescList)
< < uuid-16 0x1103 (DUN) uint 0x100 > >
aid 0x0100 (SrvName)
str "Dial-up networking"
cont 00
< HCI Command: Authentication Requested (0x01|0x0011) plen 2
handle 42
> HCI Event: Remote Name Req Complete (0x07) plen 255
status 0x00 bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05 name 'Nokia 6303i classic'
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
handle 42 packets 1
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
Authentication Requested (0x01|0x0011) status 0x00 ncmd 1
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
handle 42 packets 1
> HCI Event: Link Key Request (0x17) plen 6
bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05
< HCI Command: Link Key Request Reply (0x01|0x000b) plen 22
bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05 key 84B447892006A7144BCEE7D56429A17A
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
handle 42 packets 1
> HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 10
Link Key Request Reply (0x01|0x000b) ncmd 1
status 0x00 bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05
> HCI Event: Auth Complete (0x06) plen 3
status 0x00 handle 42
And here we start doing something wrong. Instead of encrypting the link
we just go to the next step and do a connection request.
< ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x00 dlen 12
L2CAP(s): Connect req: psm 3 scid 0x0041
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
handle 42 packets 1
> ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 16
L2CAP(s): Connect rsp: dcid 0x0000 scid 0x0041 result 3 status 0
Connection refused - security block
< ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x00 dlen 12
L2CAP(s): Disconn req: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0040
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
handle 42 packets 1
> ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 12
L2CAP(s): Disconn rsp: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0040
> HCI Event: Disconn Complete (0x05) plen 4
status 0x00 handle 42 reason 0x05
Reason: Authentication Failure
Johan pointed me to the right spot in the kernel:
static inline void hci_auth_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
[...]
if (conn->state == BT_CONFIG) {
if (!ev->status && hdev->ssp_mode > 0 && conn->ssp_mode > 0) {
struct hci_cp_set_conn_encrypt cp;
cp.handle = ev->handle;
cp.encrypt = 0x01;
hci_send_cmd(hdev, HCI_OP_SET_CONN_ENCRYPT, sizeof(cp),
&cp);
} else {
conn->state = BT_CONNECTED;
hci_proto_connect_cfm(conn, ev->status);
hci_conn_put(conn);
}
} else {
hci_auth_cfm(conn, ev->status);
hci_conn_hold(conn);
conn->disc_timeout = HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT;
hci_conn_put(conn);
}
[...]
}
Only when the connection state is BT_CONFIG we will consider the option to encrypt
it. Changing this to
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
index 919e3c0..22d7adf 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
@@ -1751,7 +1751,9 @@ static inline void hci_auth_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_b
clear_bit(HCI_CONN_AUTH_PEND, &conn->pend);
clear_bit(HCI_CONN_REAUTH_PEND, &conn->pend);
- if (conn->state == BT_CONFIG) {
+ BT_DBG("hdev->ssp_mode %d conn->ssp_mode %d state %d", hdev->ssp_mode, conn->ssp_mode, conn->state);
+
+ if (conn->state == BT_CONFIG || conn->state == BT_CONNECTED) {
if (!ev->status && hdev->ssp_mode > 0 && conn->ssp_mode > 0) {
struct hci_cp_set_conn_encrypt cp;
cp.handle = ev->handle;
did the trick. But I am pretty sure this is not right. Though I was unable to figure out where to fix this.
Any ideas?
cheers,
daniel
Here is the dmesg log with the patch above: http://pastebin.com/fTqhVBdx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: rfcomm & encryption
2012-01-03 20:20 rfcomm & encryption Daniel Wagner
@ 2012-01-03 20:34 ` Marcel Holtmann
2012-01-04 8:10 ` Szymon Janc
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Holtmann @ 2012-01-03 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Wagner; +Cc: linux-bluetooth
Hi Daniel,
> I am trying to get DUN working with SSP. If SSP is disabled everything
> is fine. As soon SSP is enabled the fun starts. As it turns out we
> try to connect without encryption enabled and the other side blocks it:
>
> HCI sniffer - Bluetooth packet analyzer ver 2.2
> device: hci0 snap_len: 1028 filter: 0xffffffffffffffff
> < HCI Command: Create Connection (0x01|0x0005) plen 13
> bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05 ptype 0xcc18 rswitch 0x01 clkoffset 0x0000
> Packet type: DM1 DM3 DM5 DH1 DH3 DH5 > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
> Create Connection (0x01|0x0005) status 0x00 ncmd 1
> > HCI Event: Connect Complete (0x03) plen 11
> status 0x00 handle 42 bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05 type ACL encrypt 0x00
> < HCI Command: Read Remote Supported Features (0x01|0x001b) plen 2
> handle 42
> > HCI Event: Page Scan Repetition Mode Change (0x20) plen 7
> bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05 mode 1
> > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3
> handle 42 slots 5
> > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
> Read Remote Supported Features (0x01|0x001b) status 0x00 ncmd 1
> > HCI Event: Read Remote Supported Features (0x0b) plen 11
> status 0x00 handle 42
> Features: 0xbf 0xee 0x0f 0xce 0x98 0xbd 0x59 0x83
> < HCI Command: Read Remote Extended Features (0x01|0x001c) plen 3
> handle 42 page 1
> > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
> Read Remote Extended Features (0x01|0x001c) status 0x00 ncmd 1
> > HCI Event: Read Remote Extended Features (0x23) plen 13
> status 0x00 handle 42 page 1 max 1
> Features: 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
> < HCI Command: Remote Name Request (0x01|0x0019) plen 10
> bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05 mode 2 clkoffset 0x0000
> < ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x00 dlen 10
> L2CAP(s): Info req: type 2
> > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
> handle 42 packets 1
> > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
> Remote Name Request (0x01|0x0019) status 0x00 ncmd 1
> > ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 16
> L2CAP(s): Info rsp: type 2 result 0
> Extended feature mask 0x0000
> < ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x00 dlen 12
> L2CAP(s): Connect req: psm 1 scid 0x0040
> > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
> handle 42 packets 1
> > ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 16
> L2CAP(s): Connect rsp: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0040 result 0 status 0
> Connection successful
> < ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x00 dlen 12
> L2CAP(s): Config req: dcid 0x0040 flags 0x00 clen 0
> > ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 16
> L2CAP(s): Config req: dcid 0x0040 flags 0x00 clen 4
> MTU 65535 < ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x00 dlen 18
> L2CAP(s): Config rsp: scid 0x0040 flags 0x00 result 0 clen 4
> MTU 65535 > ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 14
> L2CAP(s): Config rsp: scid 0x0040 flags 0x00 result 0 clen 0
> Success
> < ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x00 dlen 24
> L2CAP(d): cid 0x0040 len 20 [psm 1]
> SDP SSA Req: tid 0x0 len 0xf
> pat uuid-16 0x1103 (DUN)
> max 65535
> aid(s) 0x0000 - 0xffff
> cont 00
> > ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 112
> L2CAP(d): cid 0x0040 len 108 [psm 1]
> SDP SSA Rsp: tid 0x0 len 0x67
> count 100
> record #0
> aid 0x0000 (SrvRecHndl)
> uint 0x10003
> aid 0x0001 (SrvClassIDList)
> < uuid-16 0x1103 (DUN) uuid-16 0x1201 (Networking) >
> aid 0x0004 (ProtocolDescList)
> < < uuid-16 0x0100 (L2CAP) > <
> uuid-16 0x0003 (RFCOMM) uint 0x1 > >
> aid 0x0005 (BrwGrpList)
> < uuid-16 0x1002 (PubBrwsGrp) >
> aid 0x0006 (LangBaseAttrIDList)
> < uint 0x656e uint 0x6a uint 0x100 >
> aid 0x0009 (BTProfileDescList)
> < < uuid-16 0x1103 (DUN) uint 0x100 > >
> aid 0x0100 (SrvName)
> str "Dial-up networking"
> cont 00
> < HCI Command: Authentication Requested (0x01|0x0011) plen 2
> handle 42
> > HCI Event: Remote Name Req Complete (0x07) plen 255
> status 0x00 bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05 name 'Nokia 6303i classic'
> > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
> handle 42 packets 1
> > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
> Authentication Requested (0x01|0x0011) status 0x00 ncmd 1
> > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
> handle 42 packets 1
> > HCI Event: Link Key Request (0x17) plen 6
> bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05
> < HCI Command: Link Key Request Reply (0x01|0x000b) plen 22
> bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05 key 84B447892006A7144BCEE7D56429A17A
> > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
> handle 42 packets 1
> > HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 10
> Link Key Request Reply (0x01|0x000b) ncmd 1
> status 0x00 bdaddr A0:4E:04:F6:F5:05
> > HCI Event: Auth Complete (0x06) plen 3
> status 0x00 handle 42
>
> And here we start doing something wrong. Instead of encrypting the link
> we just go to the next step and do a connection request.
>
> < ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x00 dlen 12
> L2CAP(s): Connect req: psm 3 scid 0x0041
> > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
> handle 42 packets 1
> > ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 16
> L2CAP(s): Connect rsp: dcid 0x0000 scid 0x0041 result 3 status 0
> Connection refused - security block
> < ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x00 dlen 12
> L2CAP(s): Disconn req: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0040
> > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
> handle 42 packets 1
> > ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 12
> L2CAP(s): Disconn rsp: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0040
> > HCI Event: Disconn Complete (0x05) plen 4
> status 0x00 handle 42 reason 0x05
> Reason: Authentication Failure
>
>
> Johan pointed me to the right spot in the kernel:
>
> static inline void hci_auth_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> [...]
>
> if (conn->state == BT_CONFIG) {
> if (!ev->status && hdev->ssp_mode > 0 && conn->ssp_mode > 0) {
> struct hci_cp_set_conn_encrypt cp;
> cp.handle = ev->handle;
> cp.encrypt = 0x01;
> hci_send_cmd(hdev, HCI_OP_SET_CONN_ENCRYPT, sizeof(cp),
> &cp);
> } else {
> conn->state = BT_CONNECTED;
> hci_proto_connect_cfm(conn, ev->status);
> hci_conn_put(conn);
> }
> } else {
> hci_auth_cfm(conn, ev->status);
>
> hci_conn_hold(conn);
> conn->disc_timeout = HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT;
> hci_conn_put(conn);
> }
>
> [...]
> }
>
> Only when the connection state is BT_CONFIG we will consider the option to encrypt
> it. Changing this to
>
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> index 919e3c0..22d7adf 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> @@ -1751,7 +1751,9 @@ static inline void hci_auth_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_b
> clear_bit(HCI_CONN_AUTH_PEND, &conn->pend);
> clear_bit(HCI_CONN_REAUTH_PEND, &conn->pend);
> - if (conn->state == BT_CONFIG) {
> + BT_DBG("hdev->ssp_mode %d conn->ssp_mode %d state %d", hdev->ssp_mode, conn->ssp_mode, conn->state);
> +
> + if (conn->state == BT_CONFIG || conn->state == BT_CONNECTED) {
> if (!ev->status && hdev->ssp_mode > 0 && conn->ssp_mode > 0) {
> struct hci_cp_set_conn_encrypt cp;
> cp.handle = ev->handle;
>
>
> did the trick. But I am pretty sure this is not right. Though I was unable to figure out where to fix this.
so we are establishing the connection with security level of SDP only
hence no encryption required. Which is the only exception to run without
encryption when using SSP.
Since we do not disconnected in between SDP and RFCOMM channels, we have
to do a security level upgrade here. And for some reason that gets
triggered, but does not force encryption to be switched on.
With SSP enabled you should always switch on encryption when getting
authentication complete event. Actually generally speaking you should
always switch on encryption after authentication. Otherwise the
authentication is rather pointless anyway.
Look at commit d7556e20, then this code got re-ordered. It does not look
correct to me anymore. We might need to redo the whole auth and encrypt
callback handling.
Regards
Marcel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: rfcomm & encryption
2012-01-03 20:34 ` Marcel Holtmann
@ 2012-01-04 8:10 ` Szymon Janc
2012-01-04 10:25 ` Daniel Wagner
2012-01-04 10:29 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Szymon Janc @ 2012-01-04 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcel Holtmann
Cc: Daniel Wagner, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, Peter Hurley
Hi,
> so we are establishing the connection with security level of SDP only
> hence no encryption required. Which is the only exception to run without
> encryption when using SSP.
>
> Since we do not disconnected in between SDP and RFCOMM channels, we have
> to do a security level upgrade here. And for some reason that gets
> triggered, but does not force encryption to be switched on.
>
> With SSP enabled you should always switch on encryption when getting
> authentication complete event. Actually generally speaking you should
> always switch on encryption after authentication. Otherwise the
> authentication is rather pointless anyway.
>
> Look at commit d7556e20, then this code got re-ordered. It does not look
> correct to me anymore. We might need to redo the whole auth and encrypt
> callback handling.
Some time ago there was a patch from Peter Hurley that should fixed that issue.
I've just noticed that for some reason it was not merged upstream..
(we use it in our own branch for some time already)
[PATCH v3] Bluetooth: Fix l2cap conn failures for ssp devices
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg15312.html
--
BR
Szymon Janc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: rfcomm & encryption
2012-01-04 8:10 ` Szymon Janc
@ 2012-01-04 10:25 ` Daniel Wagner
2012-01-04 10:29 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Wagner @ 2012-01-04 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Szymon Janc
Cc: Marcel Holtmann, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, Peter Hurley
Hi Szymon,
On 04.01.2012 09:10, Szymon Janc wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> so we are establishing the connection with security level of SDP only
>> hence no encryption required. Which is the only exception to run without
>> encryption when using SSP.
>>
>> Since we do not disconnected in between SDP and RFCOMM channels, we have
>> to do a security level upgrade here. And for some reason that gets
>> triggered, but does not force encryption to be switched on.
>>
>> With SSP enabled you should always switch on encryption when getting
>> authentication complete event. Actually generally speaking you should
>> always switch on encryption after authentication. Otherwise the
>> authentication is rather pointless anyway.
>>
>> Look at commit d7556e20, then this code got re-ordered. It does not look
>> correct to me anymore. We might need to redo the whole auth and encrypt
>> callback handling.
>
> Some time ago there was a patch from Peter Hurley that should fixed that issue.
> I've just noticed that for some reason it was not merged upstream..
> (we use it in our own branch for some time already)
>
> [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: Fix l2cap conn failures for ssp devices
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg15312.html
Thanks for the pointer. This patch fixes the problem.
cheers,
daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: rfcomm & encryption
2012-01-04 8:10 ` Szymon Janc
2012-01-04 10:25 ` Daniel Wagner
@ 2012-01-04 10:29 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz @ 2012-01-04 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Szymon Janc
Cc: Marcel Holtmann, Daniel Wagner, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Hurley
Hi Szymon,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Szymon Janc <szymon.janc@tieto.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> so we are establishing the connection with security level of SDP only
>> hence no encryption required. Which is the only exception to run without
>> encryption when using SSP.
>>
>> Since we do not disconnected in between SDP and RFCOMM channels, we have
>> to do a security level upgrade here. And for some reason that gets
>> triggered, but does not force encryption to be switched on.
>>
>> With SSP enabled you should always switch on encryption when getting
>> authentication complete event. Actually generally speaking you should
>> always switch on encryption after authentication. Otherwise the
>> authentication is rather pointless anyway.
>>
>> Look at commit d7556e20, then this code got re-ordered. It does not look
>> correct to me anymore. We might need to redo the whole auth and encrypt
>> callback handling.
>
> Some time ago there was a patch from Peter Hurley that should fixed that issue.
> I've just noticed that for some reason it was not merged upstream..
> (we use it in our own branch for some time already)
>
> [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: Fix l2cap conn failures for ssp devices
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg15312.html
Indeed it seems to fix the problem, but I wonder why the
test_and_set_bit was removed in the first place, the commit messages
of the patch which introduces the regression only says that under some
situation it can cause connection timeouts but I fail to see why. Also
we should be more careful which such changes, at least there should be
more details about what it is fixing and a bit more testing since this
regression is very easy to reproduce I don't think it was tested with
ssp.
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-04 10:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-01-03 20:20 rfcomm & encryption Daniel Wagner
2012-01-03 20:34 ` Marcel Holtmann
2012-01-04 8:10 ` Szymon Janc
2012-01-04 10:25 ` Daniel Wagner
2012-01-04 10:29 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.