Re: [PATCH 4/6] ath6kl: get rid of AR_DBG_LVL_CHECK()

[Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>]

On 01/05/2012 01:58 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 01:09 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> We don't need it as debug calls already have a log level and compiler
>> should be smart enough to optimise away the code when ath6kl debug code
>> is not enabled. Also it makes it easier to abstract core code to
>> ath6kl_core.ko.
> 
> Changelog isn't representative of code changes.
> ATH6KL_DBG_ANY -> ATH6KL_DBG_IRQ.
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/debug.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/debug.c
> []
>> @@ -82,31 +82,31 @@ void ath6kl_dump_registers(struct ath6kl_device *dev,
>>  			   struct ath6kl_irq_enable_reg *irq_enable_reg)
>>  {
>>  
>> -	ath6kl_dbg(ATH6KL_DBG_ANY, ("<------- Register Table -------->\n"));
>> +	ath6kl_dbg(ATH6KL_DBG_IRQ, ("<------- Register Table -------->\n"));

It's related to this change:

-		if (AR_DBG_LVL_CHECK(ATH6KL_DBG_IRQ))
-			ath6kl_dump_registers(dev, &dev->irq_proc_reg,
-					 &dev->irq_en_reg);
+		ath6kl_dump_registers(dev, &dev->irq_proc_reg,
+				      &dev->irq_en_reg);

So instead of checking ATH6KL_DBG_IRQ before calling the function the
debug messages in function instead use ATH6KL_DBG_IRQ. I'll mention this
in the commit log.

I should get rid of that ATH6KL_DBG_ANY level completely, it's just
confusing. But I'll do that later.

Thank you for the review.

Kalle