* x11 header check still needed?
@ 2012-01-05 15:50 Christoph Egger
2012-01-05 16:27 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Egger @ 2012-01-05 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Hi,
is the x11 header check in tools/check/ still needed?
On NetBSD it is superflous and can be removed.
Christoph
--
---to satisfy European Law for business letters:
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85689 Dornach b. Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: x11 header check still needed?
2012-01-05 15:50 x11 header check still needed? Christoph Egger
@ 2012-01-05 16:27 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2012-01-05 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Egger; +Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 15:50 +0000, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is the x11 header check in tools/check/ still needed?
>
> On NetBSD it is superflous and can be removed.
I can't see any mention of "keysymdef.h" under tools so I expect it is
superfluous everywhere?
Unless keysymdef.h is just the canary header we use to check for xll
generally but we don't actually use it? Perhaps this is needed to build
qemu with SDL support (but then we'd be better checking for sdl
explicitly, which I expect the qemu config script does...)?
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-05 16:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-01-05 15:50 x11 header check still needed? Christoph Egger
2012-01-05 16:27 ` Ian Campbell
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.