Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU Code Audit Team

[Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>]

On 01/10/2012 07:33 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 10.01.2012 14:22, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> On 01/10/2012 06:58 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Probably we need to attack the reviewing problem first: That I review
>>> all block patches myself worked well as long as we were two or three
>>> people in that area, but today it doesn't scale any more without
>>> lowering the review standards - and I don't want to do that. Maybe we
>>> should introduce something like "One Reviewed-by buys you two
>>> Signed-off-bys for your own patches" ;-)
>>
>> I think one thing that helps is to make sure for maintainers to include
>> Reviewed-bys in commits.  The script I use (below) takes a mbox with the full
>> thread and folks Reviewed-by/Tested-bys into the original patch spitting out an
>> mbox with just the patches and tags.
>>
>> That way people are getting credit in git for doing reviews.  It's a small
>> incentive but every little bit helps.
>>
>> http://git.codemonkey.ws/cgit/mbox-filter.git/
>
> I usually do that, although manually.
>
> Of the 487 patches I have committed, 71 have a Reviewed-by tag in the
> commit message. Maybe I've missed to include it for some, but that's
> about the ratio that feels realistic to me.

That's 14.6%.  My rate over the past year is 15.8% so you're probably catching 
the vast majority of them.

The tree overall is 12.6% for the entire year so I guess that means the majority 
of Reviewed-by's are being added.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> Kevin
>