From: "Andreas Färber" <andreas.faerber@web.de>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
Corey Bryant <coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU Code Audit Team
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:31:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0C67E2.5020109@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_VUgbKZucNYHX-oOV-q+KxT2q5BgW5Xwczb=1-0wKY2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Am 10.01.2012 16:41, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 10 January 2012 13:39, Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@web.de> wrote:
>> If you want an incentive, just put up a rule that every patch needs to
>> be reviewed by at least the submaintainer and one person apart from the
>> author (i.e., SoB + RB/AB + SoB). If a patch is lacking that additional
>> review, the author will ping the list.
>
> Were you volunteering to do that extra review for everybody?
I have been quite a lot since doing virtualization full-time, haven't I?
I'm not volunteering for the block branch though, that's still dark
magic to me!
> It's hard enough getting one review, let alone two...
Given and take... so back to Kevin's proposal after all. ;)
/-F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-10 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-06 15:19 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU Code Audit Team Anthony Liguori
2012-01-06 16:01 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-01-06 16:14 ` Stefan Weil
2012-01-06 16:08 ` Corey Bryant
2012-01-06 17:25 ` Chris Wright
2012-01-08 14:01 ` Dor Laor
2012-01-08 16:54 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-01-06 17:37 ` Chris Wright
2012-01-06 20:02 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-06 20:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-07 3:09 ` Peter Maydell
2012-01-07 10:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-01-10 12:58 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-10 13:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-10 13:33 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-10 13:39 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-10 14:55 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-10 15:41 ` Peter Maydell
2012-01-10 16:31 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2012-01-10 14:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-10 3:31 ` Zhi Yong Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F0C67E2.5020109@web.de \
--to=andreas.faerber@web.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.