All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] State of KVM bits in linux-headers
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:38:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0DE52B.8030105@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A89B3EE9-1CCD-4DBD-9459-6104F82B4A13@suse.de>

On 01/11/2012 01:32 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 11.01.2012, at 20:16, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm a bit unhappy about the current state of our supposed to be
>> automatically sync'ed linux-headers directory in qemu. It has been
>> updated several times against undefined kernel trees, means against
>> neither a released version nor kvm.git. Now, if I run an update against
>> kvm.git + some local change, I get a churn of removals. Same will happen
>> when that local change ever goes upstream before the other stuff got
>> finally committed.
>
> Yes, call me even more unhappy about it :(.

May I suggest the following:

1) Have the header syncing script take a commit hash that's stored in git.  Make 
script ensure that this has is in Linus' tree.

2) Maintain a patch on top of Linus' tree in qemu.git that the script would 
apply before actually syncing header files.

That let's us track how we're differing from upstream in a more reliable fashion.

>> Alex, it looks to me like this is mostly PPC stuff. Can you comment on
>> the origin and workflow? E.g. KVM_CAP_SW_TLB: This has been added half a
>> year ago but is not in any Linux release around. Fishy...
>
> Ok, here's my workflow:
>
>    * KVM: receive patches on the ML
>    * KVM: wait for reviews, review myself
>    * KVM: send out a pull request
>    -- this is the point in time where I assume the ABI can be considered stable --
>    * QEMU: run update on the headers, because in a perfect world things should hit kvm.git any day
>    * KVM: pull request gets reviews causing not-pulls or abi changes and lots of churn because i need forever to pullreq again ;)
>
> I guess you see the problem. Hence I haven't pushed any kernel header updates since I realized how badly broken that process was. However even the stuff that's in qemu.git now hasn't managed to get upstream yet.

I don't think it's a broken process.  I think you made a reasonable set of 
assumptions.  I think it was just an exceptional circumstance.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-11 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-11 19:16 State of KVM bits in linux-headers Jan Kiszka
2012-01-11 19:16 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2012-01-11 19:32 ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-11 19:32   ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf
2012-01-11 19:38   ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2012-01-11 19:45     ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-11 19:46     ` Jan Kiszka
2012-01-11 19:46       ` Jan Kiszka
2012-01-11 19:48       ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-11 19:48         ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-11 19:38   ` Jan Kiszka
2012-01-11 19:38     ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2012-01-11 19:41     ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-11 19:41       ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-11 19:46       ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-11 19:48         ` Jan Kiszka
2012-01-11 19:48           ` Jan Kiszka
2012-01-11 19:52           ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-11 19:52             ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-11 19:53             ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-11 19:53               ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-11 19:59               ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-11 20:05                 ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-11 20:16                   ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-11 21:48                     ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-11 21:48                       ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf
2012-01-12  8:34                       ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-12  8:34                         ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-11 19:56             ` Jan Kiszka
2012-01-11 19:56               ` Jan Kiszka
2012-01-12  6:35         ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-12  6:35           ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-11 19:32 ` [RFC][PATCH] Update linux headers against kvm.git Jan Kiszka
2012-01-11 19:32   ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F0DE52B.8030105@codemonkey.ws \
    --to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.