* Re: [lm-sensors] sensors-detect bug ?
2012-01-27 18:00 [lm-sensors] sensors-detect bug ? Andrew Smith
@ 2012-01-27 18:09 ` Jean Delvare
2012-01-27 18:23 ` Andrew Smith
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2012-01-27 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:00:47 -0500, Andrew Smith wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> When I run the latest lm-sensors I am getting some errors,
>
> The unique error lines are
>
> Use of uninitialized value in string eq at ./sensors-detect line 2622,
> <STDIN> line 5.
Can you please test
http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/misc/sensors-detect
and see if the error is gone?
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] sensors-detect bug ?
2012-01-27 18:00 [lm-sensors] sensors-detect bug ? Andrew Smith
2012-01-27 18:09 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2012-01-27 18:23 ` Andrew Smith
2012-01-27 18:38 ` Andrew Smith
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Smith @ 2012-01-27 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3946 bytes --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Here are the results http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/misc/sensors-detect
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at ./sensors-detect line 2622,
<STDIN> line 5.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040, <STDIN> line 5.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040, <STDIN> line 5.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040, <STDIN> line 5.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040, <STDIN> line 5.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040, <STDIN> line 5.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040, <STDIN> line 5.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040, <STDIN> line 5.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040, <STDIN> line 5.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040, <STDIN> line 5.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040, <STDIN> line 5.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040, <STDIN> line 5.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040, <STDIN> line 5.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040, <STDIN> line 5.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040, <STDIN> line 5.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040.
Use of uninitialized value $name in pattern match (m//) at
./sensors-detect line 3040.
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
./sensors-detect line 3575.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=y/yW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[-- Attachment #1.2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 3757 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] sensors-detect bug ?
2012-01-27 18:00 [lm-sensors] sensors-detect bug ? Andrew Smith
2012-01-27 18:09 ` Jean Delvare
2012-01-27 18:23 ` Andrew Smith
@ 2012-01-27 18:38 ` Andrew Smith
2012-01-27 19:38 ` Jean Delvare
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Smith @ 2012-01-27 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1413 bytes --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
OK I take it back, maybe this is not a bug in sensors-detect. I was
running sensors-detect because I thought the module was not being loaded
/ not found, but I just found the real reason for the lack of sensor
info by running DMESG
ACPI: resource it87 [io 0x0295-0x0296] conflicts with ACPI region SIOE
[io 0x290-0x2af]
That may be why I was getting the errors with sensors-detect? If so,
sorry for wasting your time.
Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=V+kI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[-- Attachment #1.2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 3757 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] sensors-detect bug ?
2012-01-27 18:00 [lm-sensors] sensors-detect bug ? Andrew Smith
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-27 18:38 ` Andrew Smith
@ 2012-01-27 19:38 ` Jean Delvare
2012-01-27 20:26 ` Andrew Smith
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2012-01-27 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:38:35 -0500, Andrew Smith wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> OK I take it back, maybe this is not a bug in sensors-detect. I was
> running sensors-detect because I thought the module was not being loaded
> / not found, but I just found the real reason for the lack of sensor
> info by running DMESG
>
> ACPI: resource it87 [io 0x0295-0x0296] conflicts with ACPI region SIOE
> [io 0x290-0x2af]
This is of course the real problem, see:
http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/FAQ/Chapter3#Mysensorshavestoppedworkinginkernel2.6.31
> That may be why I was getting the errors with sensors-detect? If so,
> sorry for wasting your time.
No, the problem in sensors-detect is unrelated to the above. It seems
that on your system some of the i2c adapters have no name attribute.
Which kernel are you running? I'd like to see the output of the
following commands:
$ ls -l /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-*/
$ grep . /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-*/name
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] sensors-detect bug ?
2012-01-27 18:00 [lm-sensors] sensors-detect bug ? Andrew Smith
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-27 19:38 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2012-01-27 20:26 ` Andrew Smith
2012-01-27 21:48 ` Jean Delvare
2012-01-28 0:02 ` Andrew Smith
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Smith @ 2012-01-27 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4183 bytes --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
3.2.2
ls -l /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-*/
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/:
ls: cannot access /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/LNXSYSTM:00: No such file
or directory
ls: cannot access /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/cpu: No such file or directory
ls: cannot access /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/breakpoint: No such file or
directory
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18
d????????? ? ? ? ? ? breakpoint
d????????? ? ? ? ? ? cpu
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 i2c-1
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 i2c-2
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 i2c-3
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 i2c-4
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 ibs
d????????? ? ? ? ? ? LNXSYSTM:00
drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 pci0000:00
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 platform
drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 pnp0
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2012-01-27 15:06 rapidio
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 software
drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:20 system
drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 virtual
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-1/:
total 0
- --w------- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 15:06 delete_device
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2012-01-27 13:19 i2c-dev
- -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 12:18 name
- --w------- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 15:06 new_device
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2012-01-27 15:06 power
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 subsystem -> ../../bus/i2c
- -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 12:18 uevent
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-2/:
total 0
- --w------- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 15:06 delete_device
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2012-01-27 13:19 i2c-dev
- -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 12:18 name
- --w------- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 15:06 new_device
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2012-01-27 15:06 power
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 subsystem -> ../../bus/i2c
- -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 12:18 uevent
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-3/:
total 0
- --w------- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 15:06 delete_device
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2012-01-27 13:19 i2c-dev
- -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 12:18 name
- --w------- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 15:06 new_device
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2012-01-27 15:06 power
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 subsystem -> ../../bus/i2c
- -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 12:18 uevent
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-4/:
total 0
- --w------- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 15:06 delete_device
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2012-01-27 13:19 i2c-dev
- -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 12:18 name
- --w------- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 15:06 new_device
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2012-01-27 15:06 power
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 subsystem -> ../../bus/i2c
- -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 2012-01-27 12:18 uevent
grep . /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-*/name
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-1/name:Radeon i2c bit bus 0x91
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-2/name:Radeon i2c bit bus 0x92
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-3/name:Radeon i2c bit bus 0x93
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-4/name:Radeon i2c bit bus 0x14
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=X0wa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[-- Attachment #1.2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 3757 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] sensors-detect bug ?
2012-01-27 18:00 [lm-sensors] sensors-detect bug ? Andrew Smith
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-27 20:26 ` Andrew Smith
@ 2012-01-27 21:48 ` Jean Delvare
2012-01-28 0:02 ` Andrew Smith
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2012-01-27 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:26:17 -0500, Andrew Smith wrote:
> 3.2.2
>
> ls -l /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-*/
> /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/:
> ls: cannot access /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/LNXSYSTM:00: No such file
> or directory
> ls: cannot access /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/cpu: No such file or directory
> ls: cannot access /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/breakpoint: No such file or
> directory
> total 0
> drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18
> d????????? ? ? ? ? ? breakpoint
> d????????? ? ? ? ? ? cpu
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 i2c-1
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 i2c-2
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 i2c-3
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 i2c-4
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 ibs
> d????????? ? ? ? ? ? LNXSYSTM:00
> drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 pci0000:00
> drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 platform
> drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 pnp0
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2012-01-27 15:06 rapidio
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 software
> drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:20 system
> drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 0 2012-01-27 12:18 virtual
Looks like sysfs / driver tree corruption. i2c-0/ contains entries
which normally live in /sys/devices, and some don't even have file
attributes.
Please check if older kernels have the same problem and check that you
use reliable memory.
If you can reproduce the problem, please check the kernel logs for
any relevant message. A kernel with some debugging options enabled
might be good too.
Anyone, that's not a sensors-detect issue.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] sensors-detect bug ?
2012-01-27 18:00 [lm-sensors] sensors-detect bug ? Andrew Smith
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-27 21:48 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2012-01-28 0:02 ` Andrew Smith
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Smith @ 2012-01-28 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1200 bytes --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thank you. All fixed. This was my first time encountering something
like that and I was clearly going in the wrong direction trying to fix
it. Pointing me in the right direction really saved me a time. So
thank you!
Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=0qAP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[-- Attachment #1.2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 3757 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread