All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, gleb@redhat.com, joerg.roedel@amd.com,
	yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp, mtosatti@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86 emulator: Fix task switch privilege checks
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:12:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F267B29.6080801@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F26736A.9050800@redhat.com>

Am 30.01.2012 11:39, schrieb Avi Kivity:
> On 01/27/2012 09:23 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Currently, all task switches check privileges against the DPL of the
>> TSS. This is only correct for jmp/call to a TSS. If a task gate is used,
>> the DPL of this take gate is used for the check instead. Exceptions,
>> external interrupts and iret shouldn't perform any check.
>>
>>  
>> @@ -2372,12 +2389,32 @@ static int emulator_do_task_switch(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>>  
>>  	/* FIXME: check that next_tss_desc is tss */
>>  
>> -	if (reason != TASK_SWITCH_IRET) {
>> -		if ((tss_selector & 3) > next_tss_desc.dpl ||
>> -		    ops->cpl(ctxt) > next_tss_desc.dpl)
>> -			return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0);
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Check privileges. The three cases are task switch caused by...
>> +	 *
>> +	 * 1. Software interrupt: Check against DPL of the task gate
>> +	 * 2. Exception/IRQ/iret: No check is performed
>> +	 * 3. jmp/call: Check agains DPL of the TSS
>> +	 */
>> +	dpl = -1;
>> +	if (reason == TASK_SWITCH_GATE) {
>> +		if (idt_index != -1) {
>> +			struct kvm_desc_struct task_gate_desc;
>> +
>> +			ret = read_interrupt_descriptor(ctxt, idt_index,
>> +							&task_gate_desc);
>> +			if (ret != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
>> +				return ret;
>> +
>> +			dpl = task_gate_desc.dpl;
>> +		}
>> +	} else if (reason != TASK_SWITCH_IRET) {
>> +		dpl = next_tss_desc.dpl;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	if (dpl != -1 && ((tss_selector & 3) > dpl || ops->cpl(ctxt) > dpl))
>> +		return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0);
> 
> Should be #GP(selector), no?

This line is just moved code, but without looking it up I would expect
the selector, yes. Would be an independent bug. I can add a patch to the
series if you like.

> The TASK-GATE: branch of the CALL instruction documentation lists many
> other conditions which we don't check, so I'll accept this, otherwise
> we'll never make any progress.

Hm, I didn't really look at call, just iret and exceptions.

Seems there are many test cases left to write.

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-30 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-27 19:23 [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix task switches into/out of VM86 Kevin Wolf
2012-01-27 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86 emulator: Fix task switch privilege checks Kevin Wolf
2012-01-30 10:39   ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-30 11:12     ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2012-01-27 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86 emulator: VM86 segments must have DPL 3 Kevin Wolf
2012-01-27 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86 emulator: Allow PM/VM86 switch during task switch Kevin Wolf
2012-01-30 10:24   ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-30 10:56     ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-30 12:02       ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-30 12:04         ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-30 13:24           ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-30 11:05     ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-30 11:09       ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-30 13:23       ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-30 14:01         ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-30 14:32           ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-30 15:26             ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-30 15:44               ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-30 15:55               ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-01-31  9:37               ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-31 10:26                 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-27 19:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix task switches into/out of VM86 Gleb Natapov
2012-01-30  8:48   ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-30  8:55     ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-30 10:22       ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-30 10:35       ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-30 10:45         ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-30 10:50           ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-30 11:59             ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-30 12:16               ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-30 13:27                 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-30 12:31               ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-30 13:28                 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-30 13:29                   ` Gleb Natapov
2012-01-30 13:39                     ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-30 10:47         ` Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F267B29.6080801@redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.