From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
john.johansen@canonical.com, serge.hallyn@canonical.com,
coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pmoore@redhat.com, eparis@redhat.com,
djm@mindrot.org, segoon@openwall.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
jmorris@namei.org, scarybeasts@gmail.com, avi@redhat.com,
penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, mingo@elte.hu,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, khilman@ti.com,
borislav.petkov@amd.com, amwang@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, gregkh@suse.de, dhowells@redhat.com,
daniel.lezcano@free.fr, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, olofj@chromium.org,
mhalcrow@google.com, dla
Subject: Re: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!?
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:02:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3007AD.50307@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dac05d1da093cb86e2f654fbfe66dfce.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl>
On 02/06/2012 12:32 AM, Indan Zupancic wrote:
>
> It seems that just using eflags is a lot simpler than the alternatives,
> let's just go for it.
>
>
> I propose using bits somewhere in the middle of the upper half. If new
> flags are ever added by Intel or AMD, they will use the lower bits. If
> anyone else ever adds flags, they most likely add them to the top (VIA).
> So the middle seems the safest spot as far as long-term maintenance goes.
>
> The below version does that, but instead of setting one of the two bits,
> it always sets bit 50 for newer kernels and sets bit 51 if it's a compat
> system call. I find this version more readable and after compilation it's
> also a couple of bytes smaller compared to Linus' original version.
>
> Should we make sure that the top 32 bits are zero, in case any weird
> hardware does set our bits?
>
[Adding H.J. Lu, since he has run into some of these requirements before]
NAK in the extreme.
We have not heard back from the architecture people on this, and I will
NAK this unless that happens.
Furthermore, you're picking bits that do not work for 32 bits, EVEN
THOUGH WE HAVE A SIMILAR PROBLEM ON 32 BITS; I outlined it for you and
you chose to ignore it.
Finally, I think we actually are going to need a fair number of bits in
the end. All of this points to using a new regset designed for
extension in the first place.
As far as I can tell, we need at least the following information:
- If the CPU is currently in 32- or 64-bit mode.
- If we are currently inside a system call, and if so if it was entered
via:
- SYSCALL64
- INT 80
- SYSCALL32
- SYSENTER
The reason we need this information is because for the various 32-bit
entry points we do some very ugly swizzling of registers, which
matters to a ptrace client which wants to modify system call
arguments.
- If the process was started as a 64-bit process, i386 process or x32
process.
This adds up to a minimum of six bits already (and at least two bits on
i386), and that's just a start.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
john.johansen@canonical.com, serge.hallyn@canonical.com,
coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pmoore@redhat.com, eparis@redhat.com,
djm@mindrot.org, segoon@openwall.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
jmorris@namei.org, scarybeasts@gmail.com, avi@redhat.com,
penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, mingo@elte.hu,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, khilman@ti.com,
borislav.petkov@amd.com, amwang@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, gregkh@suse.de, dhowells@redhat.com,
daniel.lezcano@free.fr, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, olofj@chromium.org,
mhalcrow@google.com, dlaor@redhat.com,
Roland McGrath <mcgrathr@chromium.org>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!?
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:02:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3007AD.50307@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dac05d1da093cb86e2f654fbfe66dfce.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl>
On 02/06/2012 12:32 AM, Indan Zupancic wrote:
>
> It seems that just using eflags is a lot simpler than the alternatives,
> let's just go for it.
>
>
> I propose using bits somewhere in the middle of the upper half. If new
> flags are ever added by Intel or AMD, they will use the lower bits. If
> anyone else ever adds flags, they most likely add them to the top (VIA).
> So the middle seems the safest spot as far as long-term maintenance goes.
>
> The below version does that, but instead of setting one of the two bits,
> it always sets bit 50 for newer kernels and sets bit 51 if it's a compat
> system call. I find this version more readable and after compilation it's
> also a couple of bytes smaller compared to Linus' original version.
>
> Should we make sure that the top 32 bits are zero, in case any weird
> hardware does set our bits?
>
[Adding H.J. Lu, since he has run into some of these requirements before]
NAK in the extreme.
We have not heard back from the architecture people on this, and I will
NAK this unless that happens.
Furthermore, you're picking bits that do not work for 32 bits, EVEN
THOUGH WE HAVE A SIMILAR PROBLEM ON 32 BITS; I outlined it for you and
you chose to ignore it.
Finally, I think we actually are going to need a fair number of bits in
the end. All of this points to using a new regset designed for
extension in the first place.
As far as I can tell, we need at least the following information:
- If the CPU is currently in 32- or 64-bit mode.
- If we are currently inside a system call, and if so if it was entered
via:
- SYSCALL64
- INT 80
- SYSCALL32
- SYSENTER
The reason we need this information is because for the various 32-bit
entry points we do some very ugly swizzling of registers, which
matters to a ptrace client which wants to modify system call
arguments.
- If the process was started as a 64-bit process, i386 process or x32
process.
This adds up to a minimum of six bits already (and at least two bits on
i386), and that's just a start.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-06 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 409+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-11 17:25 [RFC,PATCH 0/2] dynamic seccomp policies (using BPF filters) Will Drewry
2012-01-11 17:25 ` [RFC,PATCH 1/2] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF Will Drewry
2012-01-12 8:53 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-01-12 16:54 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 16:54 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 14:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-12 16:55 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 16:55 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 15:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-12 16:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-12 16:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-12 16:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-12 17:08 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 17:08 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 17:30 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-12 17:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-12 17:44 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-12 17:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-12 23:27 ` Alan Cox
2012-01-12 23:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-12 22:18 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 22:18 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 23:00 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-12 23:00 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-12 16:14 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-12 16:14 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-12 16:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-12 16:51 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-12 16:51 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-12 17:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-12 17:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-12 18:18 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-12 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-12 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-12 18:44 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-12 19:08 ` Kyle Moffett
2012-01-12 19:08 ` Kyle Moffett
2012-01-12 23:05 ` Eric Paris
2012-01-12 23:33 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-12 23:33 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-12 19:40 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 19:40 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 19:42 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 19:42 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 19:46 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-12 19:46 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-12 20:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-12 20:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-12 16:59 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 16:59 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 17:22 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-12 17:22 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-12 17:35 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 17:57 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-12 17:57 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-12 18:03 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 18:03 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-13 1:34 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-13 2:44 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-13 6:33 ` Chris Evans
2012-01-13 6:33 ` Chris Evans
2012-01-12 17:36 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-12 16:18 ` Alan Cox
2012-01-12 17:03 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 17:03 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 17:11 ` Alan Cox
2012-01-12 17:52 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 17:52 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-13 1:31 ` James Morris
2012-01-12 16:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-12 17:10 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 17:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-12 17:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-12 17:51 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 17:51 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-13 17:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-13 17:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-13 19:01 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-13 19:01 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-13 23:10 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-13 23:10 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-13 23:12 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-13 23:12 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-13 23:30 ` Eric Paris
2012-01-15 3:40 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-16 1:40 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-16 6:49 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-16 20:12 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-17 6:46 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-17 17:37 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-18 4:06 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-18 4:38 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-17 20:34 ` Kees Cook
2012-01-17 20:42 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-17 21:09 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-18 4:47 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-16 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-16 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-16 20:15 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-16 20:15 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-17 16:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-17 16:56 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-17 16:56 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-17 17:01 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-17 17:01 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-17 17:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-17 17:45 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-17 17:45 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-18 0:56 ` Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!? [was: Re: [RFC,PATCH 1/2] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF] Indan Zupancic
2012-01-18 1:01 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-18 1:01 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-19 1:06 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-19 1:06 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-19 1:19 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-19 1:47 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-18 1:07 ` Roland McGrath
2012-01-18 1:47 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-18 1:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-18 1:50 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-18 2:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-18 2:04 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-18 2:22 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-18 2:22 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-18 2:25 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-18 4:22 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-18 4:22 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-18 5:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 5:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 6:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 6:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 13:12 ` Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!? Indan Zupancic
2012-01-18 13:12 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-18 19:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 19:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 19:36 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-18 19:36 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-18 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 19:44 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-18 19:44 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-18 19:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 19:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 19:52 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-18 19:52 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-18 19:58 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-18 19:58 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-18 19:41 ` Martin Mares
2012-01-18 19:41 ` Martin Mares
2012-01-18 19:38 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-18 19:38 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-19 16:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-19 16:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-19 16:13 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-19 16:13 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-19 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-19 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-19 19:30 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-19 19:30 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-19 19:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-19 19:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-19 19:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-19 19:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-19 23:54 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-19 23:54 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-20 0:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-20 0:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-20 15:35 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-20 15:35 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-20 17:56 ` Roland McGrath
2012-01-20 17:56 ` Roland McGrath
2012-01-20 19:45 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-20 19:45 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-18 20:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 20:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 20:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-18 20:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-18 21:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 21:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 21:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-18 21:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-18 21:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-18 21:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-18 21:51 ` Roland McGrath
2012-01-18 21:51 ` Roland McGrath
2012-01-18 21:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-18 21:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-18 23:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 23:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-19 0:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-19 0:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-20 21:51 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-20 21:51 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-20 22:40 ` Roland McGrath
2012-01-20 22:40 ` Roland McGrath
2012-01-20 22:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-20 22:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-20 23:49 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-20 23:49 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-20 23:55 ` Roland McGrath
2012-01-20 23:55 ` Roland McGrath
2012-01-20 23:58 ` hpanvin@gmail.com
2012-01-20 23:58 ` hpanvin@gmail.com
2012-01-23 2:14 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-23 2:14 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-21 0:07 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-21 0:07 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-21 0:10 ` Roland McGrath
2012-01-21 0:10 ` Roland McGrath
2012-01-21 1:23 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-21 1:23 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-23 2:37 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-23 2:37 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-23 16:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-23 16:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-24 8:19 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-24 8:19 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-06 20:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-06 20:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-06 20:39 ` Roland McGrath
2012-02-06 20:39 ` Roland McGrath
2012-02-06 20:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-06 20:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-18 21:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 21:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 21:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-18 21:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-18 21:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 21:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 21:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-18 21:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-19 1:45 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-19 1:45 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-19 2:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-19 2:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-06 8:32 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-06 8:32 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-06 17:02 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-02-06 17:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-07 1:52 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-07 1:52 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-09 0:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-09 0:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-09 4:20 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-09 4:20 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-09 4:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-09 4:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-09 6:03 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-09 6:03 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-09 14:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-09 14:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-09 16:00 ` H.J. Lu
2012-02-09 16:00 ` H.J. Lu
2012-02-10 1:09 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-10 1:09 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-10 1:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-10 1:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-10 2:29 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-10 2:29 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-10 2:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-10 2:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <cc95fcf4b1c28ee6f73e373d04593634.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl>
2012-02-10 15:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-10 15:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-10 22:42 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-10 22:42 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-10 22:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-10 22:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-12 12:07 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-12 12:07 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-25 19:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-25 19:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-25 20:20 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-25 20:20 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-25 23:36 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-25 23:36 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-25 23:32 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-25 23:32 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 0:40 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-26 0:40 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-26 1:08 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-26 1:08 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-26 1:22 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 1:22 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 6:34 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-26 6:34 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-26 10:31 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-26 10:31 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-26 10:40 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 10:40 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 11:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-26 11:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-26 14:02 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 14:02 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 11:19 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-26 11:19 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-26 11:20 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-26 11:20 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-26 11:47 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-26 11:47 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-26 14:05 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 14:05 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-27 7:23 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-27 7:23 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-10 2:02 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-02-10 2:02 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-02-10 3:37 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-10 3:37 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-10 21:19 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-02-10 21:19 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 1:09 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 1:09 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 3:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-26 3:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-26 18:03 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 18:03 ` Denys Vlasenko
2017-03-08 23:41 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2017-03-08 23:41 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2017-03-09 4:39 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2017-03-09 4:39 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2017-03-14 2:57 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2017-03-14 2:57 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2012-01-26 5:57 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-26 5:57 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-26 0:59 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-26 0:59 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-26 1:21 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 1:21 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 8:23 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-26 8:23 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-26 8:53 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 8:53 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-26 9:51 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-26 9:51 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-26 18:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-26 18:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-10 2:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-02-10 2:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-18 15:04 ` Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!? [was: Re: [RFC,PATCH 1/2] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF] Eric Paris
2012-01-18 15:04 ` Eric Paris
2012-01-18 17:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 17:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 5:43 ` Chris Evans
2012-01-18 5:43 ` Chris Evans
2012-01-18 12:12 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-18 12:12 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-18 21:13 ` Chris Evans
2012-01-18 21:13 ` Chris Evans
2012-01-19 0:14 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-19 0:14 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-19 8:16 ` Chris Evans
2012-01-19 8:16 ` Chris Evans
2012-01-19 11:34 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-19 11:34 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-19 16:11 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-19 16:11 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-19 15:40 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-19 15:40 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-18 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-18 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-18 17:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-18 17:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-18 21:09 ` Chris Evans
2012-01-18 21:09 ` Chris Evans
2012-01-23 16:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-23 16:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-23 22:23 ` Chris Evans
2012-01-23 22:23 ` Chris Evans
2012-02-07 11:45 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-07 11:45 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-19 0:29 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-19 0:29 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-18 2:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 2:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 2:31 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-18 2:31 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-18 2:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 2:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-18 14:06 ` Martin Mares
2012-01-18 14:06 ` Martin Mares
2012-01-18 18:24 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-18 18:24 ` Andi Kleen
2012-01-19 16:04 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-19 16:04 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-20 0:21 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-20 0:21 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-20 0:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-20 0:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-20 2:02 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-20 2:02 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-01-17 17:06 ` [RFC,PATCH 1/2] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF Will Drewry
2012-01-17 17:06 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-17 19:35 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-17 19:35 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 17:02 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-12 17:02 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-01-16 20:28 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-16 20:28 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-11 17:25 ` [RFC,PATCH 2/2] Documentation: prctl/seccomp_filter Will Drewry
2012-01-11 20:03 ` Jonathan Corbet
2012-01-11 20:10 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-11 20:10 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-11 23:19 ` [PATCH v2 " Will Drewry
2012-01-12 0:29 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 0:29 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 18:16 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-01-12 17:23 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 17:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-12 13:13 ` [RFC,PATCH " Łukasz Sowa
2012-01-12 17:25 ` Will Drewry
2012-01-12 17:25 ` Will Drewry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F3007AD.50307@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=djm@mindrot.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=mhalcrow@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=olofj@chromium.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=scarybeasts@gmail.com \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.