From: Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@01019freenet.de>
To: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com, gwingerde@gmail.com,
Ivo Van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Poor RT2880 performance
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:05:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3926AD.3020405@01019freenet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXE3d90az_g3KyzPp-4NQoM2zmXaNSVo=7piM=q8EK9WdBp7A@mail.gmail.com>
Helmut Schaa schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org> wrote:
>> I am playing with a RT2880-F based AP, with a N connected station, in a
>> residential environment.
>
> Mind to provide the RF and RT chipset identifications? rt2x00 should print them
> out during module load (at least when compiled with debugging options).
>
>> I could not get more than 26Mbits/sec TCP performance using iperf on both
>> sides,
Just for my understanding: did you test iperf payload in both directions
parallel or serial?
What about the hardware of the STA?
> Did aggregation kick in? What rate was selected by the AP?
I set the 80211.n options like this in hostapd.conf:
ieee80211n=1
ht_capab=[HT40+][SHORT-GI-40][SHORT-GI-20][TX-STBC1][MAX-AMSDU-3839][RX-STBC12][SMPS-STATIC][GF]
It's vitally to enable 40MHz channels, above [HT40+].
But you should put your own values into the config. You get them from iw
list of the AP interface.
>
>> changing to a busier channel even made the performance drop down to
>> 5Mbits/sec, and remained like this.
>
> Andreas also reported some issues as soon as the environment gets noisy,
> not sure what the root cause for this is :(
Yes, the issues I saw came up with nl80211 based STA interface running
parallel to a ralink legacy driver based interface (the payload from
ath9k interface was practically knocked out (DOS-attack :-)) - the
ralink legacy driver based STA sent on briskly).
Kind regards,
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-13 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-13 13:23 Poor RT2880 performance Florian Fainelli
2012-02-13 13:45 ` Helmut Schaa
2012-02-13 15:05 ` Andreas Hartmann [this message]
2012-02-13 19:18 ` Florian Fainelli
2012-02-16 13:00 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-17 8:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2012-02-17 8:52 ` Helmut Schaa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F3926AD.3020405@01019freenet.de \
--to=andihartmann@01019freenet.de \
--cc=florian@openwrt.org \
--cc=gwingerde@gmail.com \
--cc=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
--cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.