All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com, gwingerde@gmail.com,
	Ivo Van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>,
	Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@freenet.de>
Subject: Re: Poor RT2880 performance
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:50:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3E14D9.2010204@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120216130020.GG25833@redhat.com>

Hello Stanislaw,

Le 02/16/12 14:00, Stanislaw Gruszka a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:18:19PM +0100, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Le 02/13/12 14:45, Helmut Schaa a écrit :
>>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Florian Fainelli<florian@openwrt.org>   wrote:
>>>> I am playing with a RT2880-F based AP, with a N connected station, in a
>>>> residential environment.
>>> Mind to provide the RF and RT chipset identifications? rt2x00 should print them
>>> out during module load (at least when compiled with debugging options).
>> Sure, here are the HW infos of the AP:
>> Ralink RT2880   id:1 rev:1 running at 266.66 MHz
>> phy0 ->  rt2x00_set_chip: Info - Chipset detected - rt: 2860, rf:
>> 0001, rev: 0101.
> Did you try to revert commit (if you use kernel, which include it) ?
>
> commit f0425beda4d404a6e751439b562100b902ba9c98
> Author: Felix Fietkau<nbd@openwrt.org>
> Date:   Sun Aug 28 21:11:01 2011 +0200
>
>      mac80211: retry sending failed BAR frames later instead of tearing
>
> It was already identified that it couse performace issues on rt2860
> based APs.

Indeed, that seems to give me much better throughput, now I am around 
45Mbits/sec in HT20 and 64Mbits/sec in HT40+.

On a crowded channel, I could get 20Mbits/sec compared to the previous 
5Mbits/sec.

Do you know what could be the fix for RT2860 not to be impacted by this 
change or play nicely with it?

Thanks.
--
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-17  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-13 13:23 Poor RT2880 performance Florian Fainelli
2012-02-13 13:45 ` Helmut Schaa
2012-02-13 15:05   ` Andreas Hartmann
2012-02-13 19:18   ` Florian Fainelli
2012-02-16 13:00     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-17  8:50       ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2012-02-17  8:52         ` Helmut Schaa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F3E14D9.2010204@openwrt.org \
    --to=florian@openwrt.org \
    --cc=andihartmann@freenet.de \
    --cc=gwingerde@gmail.com \
    --cc=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
    --cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.