Re: [PATCH 00/10] I2C updates

[Shubhrajyoti <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>]

On Tuesday 14 February 2012 11:42 AM, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am interested in testing these patches on AM335x.

Thanks for your interest in testin.
>  Do you have a tree with these
> patches applied so that I can pull.

tree        : git://gitorious.org/linus-tree/linus-tree.git
branch    : i2c_misc_fixes

let me know if that works for you
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 19:29:55, Datta, Shubhrajyoti wrote:
>> This patch series colates the various i2c updates into
>> a series.  Since it is collection of various patches
>> the version info is not retained, however most of them undergone
>> multiple versions.
>>
>> This is rebased to linus head commit 63082402968f4b73f10b28a8ac1f3da821aeb82d
>>
>> The patch series does the following 
>>
>> - Warn fixes if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is not selected.
>> - I2C register restore only if context if the context is lost
>> - Bus busy recovery mechanism.
>> - the reset is not done in init.
>>
>> Tested on omap4sdp and omap3sdp. 
>>
>>
>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
>>
>> Jon Hunter (1):
>>   I2C: OMAP: Correct I2C revision for OMAP3
>>
>> Shubhrajyoti D (8):
>>   I2C : OMAP : make omap_i2c_unidle/idle functions depend on
>>     CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
>>   OMAP : I2C : Remove reset at init
>>   OMAP: I2C: I2C register restore only if context is lost
>>   OMAP: I2C: Fix the interrupt clearing in OMAP4
>>   OMAP: I2C: Fix the mismatch of pm_runtime enable and disable
>>   OMAP: I2C: Optimise the remove code
>>   OMAP: I2C: Fix the error handling
>>   I2C: OMAP: Don't check if wait_for_completion_timeout() returns less
>>     than zero
>>
>> Vikram Pandita (1):
>>   I2C: OMAP: Recover from Bus Busy condition
>>
>>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c |  173 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>  1 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
>
>
> Regards, 
> Gururaja