From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: perf: kvm events analysis tool
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:33:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3C953B.2060803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3C8E84.80905@gmail.com>
On 02/16/2012 01:05 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 2/15/12 9:59 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>>
>> Okay, i will post the next version after collecting your new comments!
>>
>> Thanks for your time, David! :)
>>
>
> I had more comments, but got sidetracked and forgot to come back to this. I still haven't looked at the code yet, but some comments from testing:
>
> 1. The error message:
> Warning: Error: expected type 5 but read 4
> Warning: Error: expected type 5 but read 0
> Warning: unknown op '}'
>
> is fixed by this patch which has not yet made its way into perf:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/4/41
>
> The most recent request:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/8/479
>
> Arnaldo: the patch still applies cleanly (but with an offset of -2 lines).
>
Great, it is a good fix.
But, it does not hurt the development of kvm-events.
>
> 2. negatve testing:
>
> perf kvm-events record -e kvm:* -p 2603 -- sleep 10
>
> Warning: Error: expected type 4 but read 7
> Warning: Error: expected type 5 but read 0
> Warning: failed to read event print fmt for kvm_apic
> Warning: Error: expected type 4 but read 7
> Warning: Error: expected type 5 but read 0
> Warning: failed to read event print fmt for kvm_inj_exception
> Fatal: bad op token {
>
> If other kvm events are specified in the record line they appear to be silently ignored in the report in which case why allow the -e option to record?
>
Yes, kvm-events doese not analyse these events specified by -e option since
these events are not needed by vmexit/ioport/mmio analysis.
And after kvm-evnets record, you can see these events by perf script
>
> 3. What is happening for multiple VMs?
>
> a. perf kvm-events report
> data is collected for all VMs. What is displayed in the report? An
> average for all VMs?
>
Yes
> b. perf kvm-events report --vcpu 1
> Does this given an average of all vcpu 1's?
>
Yes
> Perhaps a -p option for the report to pull out events related to a single VM. Really this could be a generic option (to perf-report and perf-script as well) to only show/analyze events for the specified pid. ie., data is recorded for all VMs (or system wide for the regular perf-record) and you want to only consider events for a specific pid. e.g., in process_sample_event() skip event if event->ip.pid != report_pid (works for perf code because PERF_SAMPLE_TID attribute is always set).
Analysis for per VMs is good idea, but please allow me put it into my TODO list. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-16 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-13 5:32 [PATCH 3/3] KVM: perf: kvm events analysis tool David Ahern
2012-02-13 5:32 ` David Ahern
2012-02-13 10:06 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-13 15:52 ` David Ahern
2012-02-16 4:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-16 5:05 ` David Ahern
2012-02-16 5:33 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-02-16 16:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-06 8:55 [PATCH v5 0/3] " Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-06 8:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] " Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-09 9:06 [PATCH v4 0/3] " Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-09 9:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] " Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-13 3:04 ` David Ahern
2012-02-13 5:00 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-20 23:47 ` David Ahern
2012-02-21 3:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-02-21 4:58 ` David Ahern
2012-02-27 4:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-01-16 9:30 [RFC][PATCH] KVM: perf: a smart tool to analyse kvm events Xiao Guangrong
2012-01-16 9:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: perf: kvm events analysis tool Xiao Guangrong
2012-01-16 10:04 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-17 2:30 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-01-24 12:49 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-16 10:08 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-01-17 2:37 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-01-17 11:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-01-24 12:51 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F3C953B.2060803@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.