All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: viresh.kumar@st.com (Viresh Kumar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] gpio/gpio-pl061: No need of thaw and poweroff routines for hibernate
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:28:37 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3CE15D.6010902@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7662253849428ce018fb7f7359e0585fca9fb597.1326274467.git.viresh.kumar@st.com>

On 1/11/2012 3:25 PM, Viresh KUMAR wrote:
> pl061 uses same routines for suspend/freeze/poweroff and resume/thaw/restore.
> We are only saving and restoring register values on these routines.
> 
> During hibernation, in freeze() we take a snapshot of gpio registers. In thaw()
> we don't actually need to restore these registers, as power was never shut down
> till now. Similarly, in poweroff() we don't need to take snapshot of these
> registers again, as it was done during freeze() and by now the image is already
> saved on disk.
> 
> This patch passes poweroff() and thaw() routines as NULL to avoid this extra
> work done.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
> ---

Hi Grant/Rafael,

Any feedback on the below patch?

>  drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c |    7 ++++++-
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c
> index 84ba1dd..45b884b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c
> @@ -430,7 +430,12 @@ static int pl061_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pl061_dev_pm_ops, pl061_suspend, pl061_resume);
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops pl061_dev_pm_ops = {
> +	.suspend = pl061_suspend,
> +	.resume = pl061_resume,
> +	.freeze = pl061_suspend,
> +	.restore = pl061_resume,
> +};
>  #endif
>  
>  static struct amba_id pl061_ids[] = {


-- 
viresh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
To: "rjw@sisk.pl" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	"grant.likely@secretlab.ca" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: "baruch@tkos.co.il" <baruch@tkos.co.il>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Armando VISCONTI <armando.visconti@st.com>,
	Shiraz HASHIM <shiraz.hashim@st.com>,
	Vipin KUMAR <vipin.kumar@st.com>,
	Rajeev KUMAR <rajeev-dlh.kumar@st.com>,
	Deepak SIKRI <deepak.sikri@st.com>,
	Vipul Kumar SAMAR <vipulkumar.samar@st.com>,
	Amit VIRDI <Amit.VIRDI@st.com>,
	Pratyush ANAND <pratyush.anand@st.com>,
	Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@st.com>,
	"viresh.linux@gmail.com" <viresh.linux@gmail.com>,
	Bhavna YADAV <bhavna.yadav@st.com>,
	Vincenzo FRASCINO <Vincenzo.FRASCINO@st.com>,
	Mirko GARDI <mirko.gardi@st.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio/gpio-pl061: No need of thaw and poweroff routines for hibernate
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:28:37 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3CE15D.6010902@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7662253849428ce018fb7f7359e0585fca9fb597.1326274467.git.viresh.kumar@st.com>

On 1/11/2012 3:25 PM, Viresh KUMAR wrote:
> pl061 uses same routines for suspend/freeze/poweroff and resume/thaw/restore.
> We are only saving and restoring register values on these routines.
> 
> During hibernation, in freeze() we take a snapshot of gpio registers. In thaw()
> we don't actually need to restore these registers, as power was never shut down
> till now. Similarly, in poweroff() we don't need to take snapshot of these
> registers again, as it was done during freeze() and by now the image is already
> saved on disk.
> 
> This patch passes poweroff() and thaw() routines as NULL to avoid this extra
> work done.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
> ---

Hi Grant/Rafael,

Any feedback on the below patch?

>  drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c |    7 ++++++-
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c
> index 84ba1dd..45b884b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c
> @@ -430,7 +430,12 @@ static int pl061_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pl061_dev_pm_ops, pl061_suspend, pl061_resume);
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops pl061_dev_pm_ops = {
> +	.suspend = pl061_suspend,
> +	.resume = pl061_resume,
> +	.freeze = pl061_suspend,
> +	.restore = pl061_resume,
> +};
>  #endif
>  
>  static struct amba_id pl061_ids[] = {


-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-16 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-11  9:55 [PATCH] gpio/gpio-pl061: No need of thaw and poweroff routines for hibernate Viresh Kumar
2012-01-11  9:55 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-02-16 10:58 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2012-02-16 10:58   ` Viresh Kumar
2012-02-16 13:38 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-16 13:38   ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F3CE15D.6010902@st.com \
    --to=viresh.kumar@st.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.