Re: [PATCH] mtd: fix the wrong check condition

[Florian Fainelli <ffainelli@freebox.fr>]

Hi,

On 02/16/12 04:12, Huang Shijie wrote:
> Hi,
>> (Add Florian and Matthieu)
>>
>> On 2/15/2012 2:33 AM, Huang Shijie wrote:
>>> If we use `||` check condition, many NAND chips which are not
>>> ONFI nands have to do the ONFI detection.
>>
>> Running the ONFI detection on non-ONFI NAND should not, ideally, be a
>> problem. They should fail one or both tests included in the routine:
>> the 'O N F I' string check or the CRC calculation.
> NO.

Can you please post the dump of the ONFI page as read by your 
controller? Is the CRC check passing? The ONFI crc function is made so 
that a page full of zeroes or 0xff won't generate a respectively 0 or ff 
checksum, so we should catch this during the CRC check.

>
> I have Hynix nand in my hand: H27UBG8T2A (page size :8192, oob:448).
> It is not an ONFI nand. See the datasheet in the attachment.
> But it accidentally can pass the ONFI detection, and get the result :
> page size 4192, oob:96. This is a wrong result.

I have already seen a Hynix chip answering to the READID command too, 
and this was highly confusing our bootloader, however, I suppose that we 
should be able to circumvent this issue anyway.

>
>
>
>
>>
>>> Use `&&` here to detect the ONFI NAND when we can not find any type
>>> in the nand_flash_ids.
>>
>> There are many chips whose ID might be in the NAND table but for which
>> it is preferable (or even required) to check by ONFI for one reason or
>> another. For instance, some ONFI chips might use odd-sized OOB that
>> isn't in the ID decoding algorithm.
>>
> This nand is 32Gb, but we can not parse it out from the id.
> I ever want to add a new database which use the all the 8/6 bytes id as
> key.
> It seems it's time to change it now.

You have said that already, but we have yet to see patches for this, I 
guess if you can post your database patch that will be easier to comment on.
--
Florian