From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add config NUMA stub to all architectures
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:32:10 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3E56DA.3050203@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120217234508.8293a84fb3ebb7fed6d60ec3@canb.auug.org.au>
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:08:15 +0400 Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@openvz.org> wrote:
>>
>> Config NUMA must be defined for all architectures,
>> otherwise IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) does not work.
>> Some arch-specific Kconfig already has this stub.
>> This patch adds it to all remaining.
>
> Why not add it somewhere generic (like mm/Kconfig, maybe) and then it can
> be removed from the architecture specific places over time (if necessary
> - I am pretty sure it is ok to have it there twice)?
>
Different architectures has different dependencies for NUMA.
Seems like Kconfig allow config option duplication, but it use default state from first.
If we add "config NUMA\n def_bool n" somewhere in generic Kconfig, default will be n if
Kconfig see this declaration first.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-17 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-17 10:20 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-17 12:06 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-17 12:08 ` [PATCH] mm: add config NUMA stub to all architectures Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-17 12:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-17 13:32 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov [this message]
2012-02-17 13:44 ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-02-17 23:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-17 20:30 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-19 17:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-02-19 18:12 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-02-19 23:21 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2012-02-19 23:21 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2012-02-20 14:24 ` Michal Marek
2012-02-19 23:04 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-19 23:15 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F3E56DA.3050203@openvz.org \
--to=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.