From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, autofs@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 07:13:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F45062C.8000104@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329903139.2193.66.camel@perseus.themaw.net>
On 02/22/2012 01:32 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
>
> Oh, DOH ...
>
> The process mounting the autofs mount is passing the pipe it will use
> for communication via a mount option so we can do this right in
> fill_super.
>
Does that mean that the autofs v5 daemon calls mount() by itself, unlike
the older autofs daemon? Otherwise you're reading the compatness of
/bin/mount...
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-22 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-22 2:24 compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 3:16 ` David Miller
2012-02-22 3:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 3:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 4:20 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 4:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 5:43 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 5:53 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 5:57 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 9:32 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 12:15 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 12:39 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 12:45 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 16:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 15:13 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-02-23 1:35 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 16:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 1:48 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23 1:54 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23 2:21 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23 6:29 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23 6:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-23 11:20 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23 11:26 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23 8:54 ` Thomas Meyer
2012-02-23 1:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 2:09 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23 2:11 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23 2:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 2:32 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-25 11:28 ` Thomas Meyer
2012-02-25 22:10 ` [PATCH] autofs4: fix compilation without CONFIG_COMPAT Andreas Schwab
2012-02-26 1:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-26 1:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-26 1:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-26 3:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-26 9:05 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-02-27 7:29 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-02-27 9:09 ` Heiko Carstens
2012-02-27 9:09 ` Heiko Carstens
2012-02-27 16:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-27 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-27 9:20 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 6:02 ` compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 16:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 17:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 17:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 18:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F45062C.8000104@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=autofs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=thomas@m3y3r.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.