All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, autofs@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:45:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4529D4.6070008@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwUvuaGdnpwVQLQLF=DdqROmKqz65v+_DXHbebNhPqkLg@mail.gmail.com>

On 02/22/2012 08:10 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> But yeah, writing fixed-size data and then having a reader that reads
> fixed-size data is just not a very good approach. It's doubly bad when
> the "fixed size" isn't an explicit size that is documented in the
> protocol, but depends on data structures.
> 

Incidentally, a valid user space workaround for this problem would be to
just read all the data off the pipe but consider the packet length to be
NAME_MAX rather than NAME_MAX+1; then simply discard all-zero ints
received on input since a packet always starts with the autofs version
number.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-22 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-22  2:24 compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22  3:16 ` David Miller
2012-02-22  3:33   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22  3:47     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22  4:20       ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22  4:56       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22  5:43         ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22  5:53           ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22  5:57             ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22  9:32               ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 12:15                 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 12:39                   ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 12:45                     ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 16:20                       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 15:13                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-23  1:35                   ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 16:12                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23  1:48                   ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  1:54                     ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  2:21                       ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  6:29                         ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  6:31                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-23 11:20                             ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23 11:26                               ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  8:54                         ` Thomas Meyer
2012-02-23  1:56                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23  2:09                       ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  2:11                         ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  2:25                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23  2:32                           ` Ian Kent
2012-02-25 11:28               ` Thomas Meyer
2012-02-25 22:10               ` [PATCH] autofs4: fix compilation without CONFIG_COMPAT Andreas Schwab
2012-02-26  1:31                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-26  1:46                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-26  1:53                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-26  3:07                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-26  9:05                   ` Andreas Schwab
2012-02-27  7:29                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-02-27  9:09                     ` Heiko Carstens
2012-02-27  9:09                       ` Heiko Carstens
2012-02-27 16:22                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-27 16:25                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-27  9:20                     ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22  6:02           ` compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 16:10             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 17:43               ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 17:45               ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-02-22 18:16                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 18:19                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 18:20                   ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F4529D4.6070008@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=autofs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=thomas@m3y3r.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.