All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] gpio/omap: Fix IRQ handling for SPARSE_IRQ
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:46:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F46C1AF.2040201@ti.com> (raw)

The GPIO driver is still relying on internal OMAP IRQ defines that
are not relevant anymore if OMAP is built with SPARSE_IRQ.

Replace the defines with the proper IRQ base number.
Clean some comment style issue.
Remove some hidden and ugly cpu_class_is_omap1() inside the
gpio header.

XXX: That fix might be broken for OMAP1 MPUIO case.

Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
---

Hi Tony,

Please note that this patch is still RFC, because I do not know how to fix properly the ugly cpu_class_is_omap1 and the dependency with IH_MPUIO_BASE to detect a MPUIO.

I'm still sending it, because it is needed to have SPARSE_IRQ working on OMAP4 with the previous series I've just sent.

Regards,
Benoit

 arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h |   22 ++------------------
 drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c               |   33 ++++++++++++++++---------------
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
index cb75b65..b8a96c6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
@@ -218,30 +218,14 @@ extern void omap_set_gpio_debounce(int gpio, int enable);
 extern void omap_set_gpio_debounce_time(int gpio, int enable);
 /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
 
-/* Wrappers for "new style" GPIO calls, using the new infrastructure
+/*
+ * Wrappers for "new style" GPIO calls, using the new infrastructure
  * which lets us plug in FPGA, I2C, and other implementations.
- * *
+ *
  * The original OMAP-specific calls should eventually be removed.
  */
 
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <asm-generic/gpio.h>
 
-static inline int irq_to_gpio(unsigned irq)
-{
-	int tmp;
-
-	/* omap1 SOC mpuio */
-	if (cpu_class_is_omap1() && (irq < (IH_MPUIO_BASE + 16)))
-		return (irq - IH_MPUIO_BASE) + OMAP_MAX_GPIO_LINES;
-
-	/* SOC gpio */
-	tmp = irq - IH_GPIO_BASE;
-	if (tmp < OMAP_MAX_GPIO_LINES)
-		return tmp;
-
-	/* we don't supply reverse mappings for non-SOC gpios */
-	return -EIO;
-}
-
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
index bc2bd69..afef0f7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ struct gpio_bank {
 #define GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio) (1 << GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio))
 #define GPIO_MOD_CTRL_BIT	BIT(0)
 
+static int irq_to_gpio(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned int gpio_irq)
+{
+	return gpio_irq - bank->irq_base + bank->chip.base;
+}
+
 static void _set_gpio_direction(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int is_input)
 {
 	void __iomem *reg = bank->base;
@@ -369,7 +374,7 @@ static int _set_gpio_triggering(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int trigger)
 
 static int gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type)
 {
-	struct gpio_bank *bank;
+	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 	unsigned gpio;
 	int retval;
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -377,13 +382,11 @@ static int gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type)
 	if (!cpu_class_is_omap2() && d->irq > IH_MPUIO_BASE)
 		gpio = OMAP_MPUIO(d->irq - IH_MPUIO_BASE);
 	else
-		gpio = d->irq - IH_GPIO_BASE;
+		gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, d->irq);
 
 	if (type & ~IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
-
 	if (!bank->regs->leveldetect0 &&
 		(type & (IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW|IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -524,14 +527,10 @@ static void _reset_gpio(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio)
 /* Use disable_irq_wake() and enable_irq_wake() functions from drivers */
 static int gpio_wake_enable(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int enable)
 {
-	unsigned int gpio = d->irq - IH_GPIO_BASE;
-	struct gpio_bank *bank;
-	int retval;
-
-	bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
-	retval = _set_gpio_wakeup(bank, gpio, enable);
+	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	unsigned int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, d->irq);
 
-	return retval;
+	return _set_gpio_wakeup(bank, gpio, enable);
 }
 
 static int omap_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
@@ -675,11 +674,13 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
 
 		gpio_irq = bank->irq_base;
 		for (; isr != 0; isr >>= 1, gpio_irq++) {
-			gpio_index = GPIO_INDEX(bank, irq_to_gpio(gpio_irq));
+			int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, gpio_irq);
 
 			if (!(isr & 1))
 				continue;
 
+			gpio_index = GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio);
+
 			/*
 			 * Some chips can't respond to both rising and falling
 			 * at the same time.  If this irq was requested with
@@ -705,8 +706,8 @@ exit:
 
 static void gpio_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	unsigned int gpio = d->irq - IH_GPIO_BASE;
 	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	unsigned int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, d->irq);
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
@@ -716,16 +717,16 @@ static void gpio_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
 
 static void gpio_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	unsigned int gpio = d->irq - IH_GPIO_BASE;
 	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	unsigned int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, d->irq);
 
 	_clear_gpio_irqstatus(bank, gpio);
 }
 
 static void gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	unsigned int gpio = d->irq - IH_GPIO_BASE;
 	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	unsigned int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, d->irq);
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
@@ -736,8 +737,8 @@ static void gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 
 static void gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	unsigned int gpio = d->irq - IH_GPIO_BASE;
 	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	unsigned int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, d->irq);
 	unsigned int irq_mask = GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio);
 	u32 trigger = irqd_get_trigger_type(d);
 	unsigned long flags;
-- 
1.7.0.4


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] gpio/omap: Fix IRQ handling for SPARSE_IRQ
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:46:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F46C1AF.2040201@ti.com> (raw)

The GPIO driver is still relying on internal OMAP IRQ defines that
are not relevant anymore if OMAP is built with SPARSE_IRQ.

Replace the defines with the proper IRQ base number.
Clean some comment style issue.
Remove some hidden and ugly cpu_class_is_omap1() inside the
gpio header.

XXX: That fix might be broken for OMAP1 MPUIO case.

Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
---

Hi Tony,

Please note that this patch is still RFC, because I do not know how to fix properly the ugly cpu_class_is_omap1 and the dependency with IH_MPUIO_BASE to detect a MPUIO.

I'm still sending it, because it is needed to have SPARSE_IRQ working on OMAP4 with the previous series I've just sent.

Regards,
Benoit

 arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h |   22 ++------------------
 drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c               |   33 ++++++++++++++++---------------
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
index cb75b65..b8a96c6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
@@ -218,30 +218,14 @@ extern void omap_set_gpio_debounce(int gpio, int enable);
 extern void omap_set_gpio_debounce_time(int gpio, int enable);
 /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
 
-/* Wrappers for "new style" GPIO calls, using the new infrastructure
+/*
+ * Wrappers for "new style" GPIO calls, using the new infrastructure
  * which lets us plug in FPGA, I2C, and other implementations.
- * *
+ *
  * The original OMAP-specific calls should eventually be removed.
  */
 
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <asm-generic/gpio.h>
 
-static inline int irq_to_gpio(unsigned irq)
-{
-	int tmp;
-
-	/* omap1 SOC mpuio */
-	if (cpu_class_is_omap1() && (irq < (IH_MPUIO_BASE + 16)))
-		return (irq - IH_MPUIO_BASE) + OMAP_MAX_GPIO_LINES;
-
-	/* SOC gpio */
-	tmp = irq - IH_GPIO_BASE;
-	if (tmp < OMAP_MAX_GPIO_LINES)
-		return tmp;
-
-	/* we don't supply reverse mappings for non-SOC gpios */
-	return -EIO;
-}
-
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
index bc2bd69..afef0f7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ struct gpio_bank {
 #define GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio) (1 << GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio))
 #define GPIO_MOD_CTRL_BIT	BIT(0)
 
+static int irq_to_gpio(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned int gpio_irq)
+{
+	return gpio_irq - bank->irq_base + bank->chip.base;
+}
+
 static void _set_gpio_direction(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int is_input)
 {
 	void __iomem *reg = bank->base;
@@ -369,7 +374,7 @@ static int _set_gpio_triggering(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int trigger)
 
 static int gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type)
 {
-	struct gpio_bank *bank;
+	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 	unsigned gpio;
 	int retval;
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -377,13 +382,11 @@ static int gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type)
 	if (!cpu_class_is_omap2() && d->irq > IH_MPUIO_BASE)
 		gpio = OMAP_MPUIO(d->irq - IH_MPUIO_BASE);
 	else
-		gpio = d->irq - IH_GPIO_BASE;
+		gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, d->irq);
 
 	if (type & ~IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
-
 	if (!bank->regs->leveldetect0 &&
 		(type & (IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW|IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -524,14 +527,10 @@ static void _reset_gpio(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio)
 /* Use disable_irq_wake() and enable_irq_wake() functions from drivers */
 static int gpio_wake_enable(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int enable)
 {
-	unsigned int gpio = d->irq - IH_GPIO_BASE;
-	struct gpio_bank *bank;
-	int retval;
-
-	bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
-	retval = _set_gpio_wakeup(bank, gpio, enable);
+	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	unsigned int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, d->irq);
 
-	return retval;
+	return _set_gpio_wakeup(bank, gpio, enable);
 }
 
 static int omap_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
@@ -675,11 +674,13 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
 
 		gpio_irq = bank->irq_base;
 		for (; isr != 0; isr >>= 1, gpio_irq++) {
-			gpio_index = GPIO_INDEX(bank, irq_to_gpio(gpio_irq));
+			int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, gpio_irq);
 
 			if (!(isr & 1))
 				continue;
 
+			gpio_index = GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio);
+
 			/*
 			 * Some chips can't respond to both rising and falling
 			 * at the same time.  If this irq was requested with
@@ -705,8 +706,8 @@ exit:
 
 static void gpio_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	unsigned int gpio = d->irq - IH_GPIO_BASE;
 	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	unsigned int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, d->irq);
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
@@ -716,16 +717,16 @@ static void gpio_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
 
 static void gpio_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	unsigned int gpio = d->irq - IH_GPIO_BASE;
 	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	unsigned int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, d->irq);
 
 	_clear_gpio_irqstatus(bank, gpio);
 }
 
 static void gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	unsigned int gpio = d->irq - IH_GPIO_BASE;
 	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	unsigned int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, d->irq);
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
@@ -736,8 +737,8 @@ static void gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 
 static void gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	unsigned int gpio = d->irq - IH_GPIO_BASE;
 	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	unsigned int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, d->irq);
 	unsigned int irq_mask = GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio);
 	u32 trigger = irqd_get_trigger_type(d);
 	unsigned long flags;
-- 
1.7.0.4

             reply	other threads:[~2012-02-23 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-23 22:46 Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2012-02-23 22:46 ` [RFC PATCH] gpio/omap: Fix IRQ handling for SPARSE_IRQ Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-23 23:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-23 23:08   ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-24 10:11   ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-24 10:11     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-24 10:37     ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-24 10:37       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-24 13:24       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-24 13:24         ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-24 13:32         ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-24 13:32           ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-24 13:53           ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-24 13:53             ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-24 13:56             ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-24 13:56               ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-24 15:09               ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-24 15:09                 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-24 15:12                 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-24 15:12                   ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-24 14:14 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-24 14:14   ` Rob Herring
2012-02-24 14:54   ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-24 14:54     ` Cousson, Benoit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F46C1AF.2040201@ti.com \
    --to=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.