From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"aliguori@us.ibm.com" <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] RTC: New logic to emulate RTC
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 07:56:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4734A8.3090707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E07AD58@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 02/24/2012 01:55 AM, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Hi paolo The DM and 24/12 test case assumes the changing of DM bit
> will reflect to RTC internal clock. But the datasheet said nothing
> will affect if you change it. Also, the current logic in qemu has the
> same assumption. Does this a bug or just by design?
Don't care about that part, it was more to test the BCD logic.
Paolo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "aliguori@us.ibm.com" <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] RTC: New logic to emulate RTC
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 07:56:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4734A8.3090707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E07AD58@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 02/24/2012 01:55 AM, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Hi paolo The DM and 24/12 test case assumes the changing of DM bit
> will reflect to RTC internal clock. But the datasheet said nothing
> will affect if you change it. Also, the current logic in qemu has the
> same assumption. Does this a bug or just by design?
Don't care about that part, it was more to test the BCD logic.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-24 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-20 0:24 [PATCH v2 0/4] RTC: New logic to emulate RTC Zhang, Yang Z
2012-02-20 0:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Zhang, Yang Z
2012-02-20 7:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-02-20 7:41 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2012-02-21 0:00 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2012-02-21 0:00 ` [Qemu-devel] " Zhang, Yang Z
2012-02-22 11:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-02-22 11:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2012-02-23 1:49 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2012-02-23 1:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Zhang, Yang Z
2012-02-23 6:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-02-23 6:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2012-02-23 7:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-02-23 7:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2012-02-24 0:55 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2012-02-24 0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] " Zhang, Yang Z
2012-02-24 6:56 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-02-24 6:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F4734A8.3090707@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.