All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Doubt about cache coherence related perf event
@ 2012-02-25  4:05 Joy James Prabhu
  2012-02-27  3:39 ` David Ahern
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joy James Prabhu @ 2012-02-25  4:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-perf-users

 I am working on monitoring cache coherence events using perf. The more I use
the tool, the more I appreciate its design :)

 So, I am using perf on Intel i7 Nehalem machine which supports this event
related to L1 data cache stores :

#-----------------------------
IDX     : 31457325
PMU name : nhm (Intel Nehalem)
Name     : L1D_CACHE_ST
Equiv     : None
Flags    : None
Desc     : L1 data cache stores
Code     : 0x41
Umask-00 : 0x04 : PMU : [E_STATE] : None : L1 data cache stores in E state
Umask-01 : 0x01 : PMU : [I_STATE] : None : L1 data cache store in the I state
Umask-02 : 0x08 : PMU : [M_STATE] : None : L1 data cache stores in M state
Umask-03 : 0x02 : PMU : [S_STATE] : None : L1 data cache stores in S state
Umask-04 : 0x0f : PMU : [MESI] : [default] : L1 data cache store in all states

To obtain these events, I used the command :
          "perf -R -e r141:u,r241:u,r441:u,r841:u  -c 3 <some binary>"


(a) Now, just to be sure, are my raw event identifiers correct ?

(b) I then used "perf script" on the perf.data file, but here comes the strange
part :

     I got this log tuple for 'pbzip2_good' binary using r841:u [ L1 data cache
stores in modified state at user level ] :

     pbzip2_good  5857 [004] 15198.792535: raw 0x841:   402c1c
_Z19consumer_decompressPv 
(/home/joy/Desktop/Perf/pbzip2/pbzip2-0.9.4/pbzip2_good)

     Basically, it points to an instruction 402c1c in consumer_decompress
function which is basically a call to pthread_mutex_lock :

/home/joy/Desktop/Perf/pbzip2/pbzip2-0.9.4/pbzip2.cpp:555
  402c18:    48 8b 7b 30              mov    0x30(%rbx),%rdi
  402c1c:    e8 87 ed ff ff           callq  4019a8 <pthread_mutex_lock@plt>

    Corresponding code :

     pthread_mutex_lock(fifo->mut);
    
   So, I was expecting "402c18" to be the interesting instruction, but I always
see the "402c1c" instruction in the perf log. I see several more
pthread_function calls in the log.

   How can a "call" instruction, which from my understanding, has nothing to do
with cache coherence events in data cache, always come up in the output ?  While
the "mov" instruction, which is more related to modified stores in data cache,
never comes up in the log.

  All suggestions are welcome :)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-27 18:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-25  4:05 Doubt about cache coherence related perf event Joy James Prabhu
2012-02-27  3:39 ` David Ahern
2012-02-27 18:15   ` Joy James Prabhu Arulraj

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.