From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
linaro-dev-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org,
patches-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Mark Brown
<broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
lrg-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:24:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4C028E.2000405@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6vU2dSpRrqd2y=ssgVsWuwpuvFtja9YcUAQA_ETWcwCYg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On 2/27/2012 11:17 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>>
>> On 2/27/2012 2:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>>
>>>> Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine
>>>> re-sending adding support for the 2 twl6030 fixed regulators.
>>>
>>>
>>> Please can you guys come up with a single unified series for this stuff
>>> - I'll hold off on applying anything to allow you to do this.
>>
>>
>> The issue is that the initial TWL regulator series from Rajendra will depend
>> on the twl core DT support I have that depends on the irq_domain series from
>> Grant...
>
> If it depends on the irqdomain tree, then just merge that tree into
> yours. That tree is stable now for exactly that reason. You can rely
> on it.
I've just posted a pull request [1] to Tony that will merge your series
into an OMAP DT branch to be a base for further OMAP DT series.
Regards,
Benoit
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg65346.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:24:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4C028E.2000405@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6vU2dSpRrqd2y=ssgVsWuwpuvFtja9YcUAQA_ETWcwCYg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/27/2012 11:17 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson@ti.com> wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>>
>> On 2/27/2012 2:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>>
>>>> Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine
>>>> re-sending adding support for the 2 twl6030 fixed regulators.
>>>
>>>
>>> Please can you guys come up with a single unified series for this stuff
>>> - I'll hold off on applying anything to allow you to do this.
>>
>>
>> The issue is that the initial TWL regulator series from Rajendra will depend
>> on the twl core DT support I have that depends on the irq_domain series from
>> Grant...
>
> If it depends on the irqdomain tree, then just merge that tree into
> yours. That tree is stable now for exactly that reason. You can rely
> on it.
I've just posted a pull request [1] to Tony that will merge your series
into an OMAP DT branch to be a base for further OMAP DT series.
Regards,
Benoit
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg65346.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-27 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-27 10:35 [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 10:35 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] regulator: twl: adapt twl-regulator driver to dt Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 10:36 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] arm/dts: twl: Pass regulator data from dt Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 10:36 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 12:15 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators Peter Ujfalusi
2012-02-27 12:15 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-02-27 12:31 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 12:31 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 13:41 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-27 13:41 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-27 13:52 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-27 13:52 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-27 14:03 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-27 14:03 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20120227140356.GF3191-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2012-02-27 14:21 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-27 14:21 ` Cousson, Benoit
[not found] ` <4F4B9166.7020909-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-02-27 14:53 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-27 14:53 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-28 5:41 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-28 5:41 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-28 10:18 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-28 10:18 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-27 22:17 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-27 22:17 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <CACxGe6vU2dSpRrqd2y=ssgVsWuwpuvFtja9YcUAQA_ETWcwCYg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-02-27 22:24 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2012-02-27 22:24 ` Cousson, Benoit
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-23 11:35 Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-23 11:35 ` Rajendra Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F4C028E.2000405@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linaro-dev-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lrg-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=patches-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rnayak-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.