* Strange issue with IPv6 through ipsec
@ 2012-02-29 23:43 Niccolò Belli
[not found] ` <4F4EB820.1090607-DEeHIYRtcplPMsqi6aon0Q@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Niccolò Belli @ 2012-02-29 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA; +Cc: users-3+4lAyCyj6DkhV4RL1hkzWD2FQJk+8+b
Hi,
I'm not sure if netdev is the right place, that's a strange behavior but
I'm not sure if it's a bug because I'm an IPv6 newbie.
I'd like to give my servers IPv6 connectivity for the World IPv6 Launch,
so I bought a virtual machine with IPv6 connectivity and I asked to
route a /56, then I extruded it through an IKEv2 ipsec tunnel
(Strongswan 4.5.3 on Debian Squeeze amd64).
A is the virtual machine with IPv6 connectivity.
B is the other peer.
A has IPv6 a:b:c:d::1/64
The routed subnet is a:b:c:300::/56
After the tunnel creation I add an IPv6 to B external interface:
ip -6 addr add a:b:c:301::1/6 dev nas0
Then I create a default route:
ip -6 route add default via a:b:c:0301::2 dev nas0
Now I can ping A from B and B from A.
If I destroy and re-create the tunnel everything keep working.
If instead of adding an IPv6 to nas0 I add it to eth0 (an internal
interface):
ip -6 addr add a:b:c:301::1/6 dev eth0
ip -6 route add default via a:b:c:0301::2 dev eth0
it still works (A con ping B and B can ping A) *BUT* if I destroy and
re-create the tunnel it doesn't work anymore!
I have to type:
ip -6 addr del a:b:c:301::1/6 dev eth0
ip -6 addr add a:b:c:301::1/6 dev eth0
ip -6 route add default via a:b:c:0301::2 dev eth0
to make it work again O_O
Cheers,
Niccolò
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread[parent not found: <4F4EB820.1090607-DEeHIYRtcplPMsqi6aon0Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Strange issue with IPv6 through ipsec [not found] ` <4F4EB820.1090607-DEeHIYRtcplPMsqi6aon0Q@public.gmane.org> @ 2012-03-01 0:03 ` Niccolò Belli [not found] ` <4F4EBCE3.8040301-DEeHIYRtcplPMsqi6aon0Q@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Niccolò Belli @ 2012-03-01 0:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA; +Cc: users-3+4lAyCyj6DkhV4RL1hkzWD2FQJk+8+b Il 01/03/2012 00:43, Niccolò Belli ha scritto: > ip -6 addr add a:b:c:301::1/6 dev nas0 That's obviously /64. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4F4EBCE3.8040301-DEeHIYRtcplPMsqi6aon0Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Strange issue with IPv6 through ipsec [not found] ` <4F4EBCE3.8040301-DEeHIYRtcplPMsqi6aon0Q@public.gmane.org> @ 2012-03-02 13:19 ` Niccolò Belli 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Niccolò Belli @ 2012-03-02 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA; +Cc: users-3+4lAyCyj6DkhV4RL1hkzWD2FQJk+8+b Sorry for the dumb question, it isn't a bug and I found the answer using dcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes 14:09:40.891358 IP6 a:b:c:301::1 > ff02::1:ff00:2: ICMP6, neighbor solicitation, who has a:b:c:301::2, length 32 14:09:40.891708 IP6 a:b:c:301::2 > a:b:c:301::1: ICMP6, neighbor advertisement, tgt is a:b:c:301::2, length 32 14:09:40.891727 IP6 a:b:c:301::1 > a:b:c:301::2: ICMP6, echo request, seq 1, length 64 14:09:40.891778 IP6 a:b:c:301::2 > a:b:c:301::1: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 1, length 64 14:09:41.887406 IP6 a:b:c:301::1 > a:b:c:301::2: ICMP6, echo request, seq 2, length 64 14:09:41.887478 IP6 a:b:c:301::2 > a:b:c:301::1: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 2, length 64 14:09:42.887391 IP6 a:b:c:301::1 > a:b:c:301::2: ICMP6, echo request, seq 3, length 64 14:09:42.887440 IP6 a:b:c:301::2 > a:b:c:301::1: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 3, length 64 14:09:43.886647 IP6 a:b:c:301::1 > a:b:c:301::2: ICMP6, echo request, seq 4, length 64 14:09:43.886716 IP6 a:b:c:301::2 > a:b:c:301::1: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 4, length 64 14:09:44.886636 IP6 a:b:c:301::1 > a:b:c:301::2: ICMP6, echo request, seq 5, length 64 14:09:44.886687 IP6 a:b:c:301::2 > a:b:c:301::1: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 5, length 64 14:09:45.886651 IP6 a:b:c:301::1 > a:b:c:301::2: ICMP6, echo request, seq 6, length 64 14:09:45.886722 IP6 a:b:c:301::2 > a:b:c:301::1: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 6, length 64 14:09:45.889830 IP6 fe80::211:d8ff:fed9:c01a > a:b:c:301::1: ICMP6, neighbor solicitation, who has a:b:c:301::1, length 32 14:09:45.889866 IP6 a:b:c:301::1 > fe80::211:d8ff:fed9:c01a: ICMP6, neighbor advertisement, tgt is a:b:c:301::1, length 24 I simply had to passthrough multicast link-local traffic. I'm sorry but I'm really newbie to IPv6 :( Regards, Niccolò ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-02 13:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-29 23:43 Strange issue with IPv6 through ipsec Niccolò Belli
[not found] ` <4F4EB820.1090607-DEeHIYRtcplPMsqi6aon0Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-01 0:03 ` Niccolò Belli
[not found] ` <4F4EBCE3.8040301-DEeHIYRtcplPMsqi6aon0Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-02 13:19 ` Niccolò Belli
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.