From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the moduleh tree with the usb tree
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:56:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5625B3.9020400@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120306165053.c42cdb7ff8e6772a0a8ebbd5@canb.auug.org.au>
On 12-03-06 12:50 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the moduleh tree got a conflict in
> drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c between commit 45b3cd4ad79b ("usb: dwc3:
> omap: convert pdata to of property") from the usb tree and commit
> 13ae246db4a0 ("includecheck: delete any duplicate instances of module.h")
> from the moduleh tree.
>
> Just context changes. I fixed it up and can carry the fix as necessary.
Thanks Stephen,
I had a look and the instance being deleted is really the right
one to delete, so this conflict will have to stay carried it seems.
Paul.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the moduleh tree with the usb tree
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:56:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5625B3.9020400@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120306165053.c42cdb7ff8e6772a0a8ebbd5@canb.auug.org.au>
On 12-03-06 12:50 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the moduleh tree got a conflict in
> drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c between commit 45b3cd4ad79b ("usb: dwc3:
> omap: convert pdata to of property") from the usb tree and commit
> 13ae246db4a0 ("includecheck: delete any duplicate instances of module.h")
> from the moduleh tree.
>
> Just context changes. I fixed it up and can carry the fix as necessary.
Thanks Stephen,
I had a look and the instance being deleted is really the right
one to delete, so this conflict will have to stay carried it seems.
Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-06 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-06 5:50 linux-next: manual merge of the moduleh tree with the usb tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-06 14:56 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2012-03-06 14:56 ` Paul Gortmaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F5625B3.9020400@windriver.com \
--to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.