From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: backport requests for 4.x-testing
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:08:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5741BE.7090101@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F574F3D0200007800076E2F@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 07/03/12 11:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 07.03.12 at 11:59, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> wrote:
>> On 07/03/2012 10:44, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> So they are not. It appears that there was an off-by-6 numbering error
>>> in our patch queue for these patches. Apologies for that.
>>>
>>> The numbers were in fact 24536,24537,24564,24565.
>> Applied.
> Hmm, if you apply 24537, then you should also pull in 24971 (perhaps
> once it made it through the stage tests).
>
> Jan
Yes - I had my eye on that patch. I will pull it through after it
passes the tests.
--
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-07 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-06 10:13 backport requests for 4.x-testing Jan Beulich
2012-03-06 10:38 ` Keir Fraser
2012-03-06 11:04 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-03-07 7:25 ` Roderick Colenbrander
2012-03-07 9:43 ` Keir Fraser
2012-03-13 16:50 ` Ian Jackson
2012-03-13 17:25 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-03-13 17:52 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-03-13 18:23 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-03-14 10:03 ` Ian Jackson
2012-03-14 9:58 ` Ian Jackson
2012-03-14 11:37 ` Ian Jackson
2012-03-14 23:08 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-03-19 14:22 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-04-03 15:04 ` Ian Jackson
2012-03-07 9:43 ` Keir Fraser
2012-03-07 10:44 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-03-07 10:59 ` Keir Fraser
2012-03-07 11:06 ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-07 11:08 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2012-03-07 19:38 ` Ian Campbell
2012-03-08 10:38 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-03-08 10:42 ` Keir Fraser
2012-03-13 16:52 ` Ian Jackson
2012-03-24 17:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-03-29 9:22 ` Keir Fraser
2012-03-29 11:32 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-03-29 11:42 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-03-29 15:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-03-29 15:26 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-03-29 15:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-03-29 16:20 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-03-29 16:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-03-29 16:39 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-03-29 11:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-03-29 15:31 ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-29 17:06 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-03-30 8:23 ` Keir Fraser
2012-03-30 9:59 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-04-03 15:08 ` Ian Jackson
2012-04-03 15:15 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-04-03 16:58 ` Ian Jackson
2012-04-03 19:50 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-04-03 20:02 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-04-04 10:22 ` Ian Jackson
2012-04-04 12:54 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-04-04 15:09 ` Ian Jackson
2012-03-07 9:18 ` Keir Fraser
2012-03-07 10:10 ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-08 10:00 ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-08 10:05 ` Keir Fraser
2012-03-08 10:45 ` Jan Beulich
2012-03-08 11:00 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F5741BE.7090101@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.